The hidden Abysses of Cancer research

20.05.2024 | www.kla.tv/29110

Hardly any other disease has such a profound impact on our society as cancer. Surely everyone in their immediate environment knows someone who has suffered from cancer or even died. In 2018 alone, before Corona, there were 18 million new cases of cancer worldwide. In Germany, cancer was the second most common cause of death in 2022. The statistics of the last 10 years show an increasing trend in the cancer death rate, with an increase of 1.5 percent. In 2019, the Südkurier headlined: “120 billion euros for research: Why the EU is now declaring war on cancer.” According to this, research spending should be increased by a further 120 billion between 2021 and 2027. Huge amounts of money have always flowed into cancer research. But why has there been no significant progress in the fight against cancer so far? Let's start with a brief look at the history of cancer research over 100 years ago. 1. History of cancer research Around 1900, more and more pathogens were found that were responsible for various infectious diseases [infection by pathogens]. The researchers also initially looked for a pathogen in cancer. The research results of Professors Robert Koch and M. Newjadomskij were very informative. They both independently determined that cancer tumor cells are different from normal tissue. They show behaviors that are not known from normal body cells. For example, they show seemingly unlimited growth, move “like amoebas” and form metastases in completely different parts of the body. Therefore, Koch and Newjadomskij concluded that cancer is caused by microparasites, i.e. tiny pathogens. Other researchers, however, described the development of cancer as having an “inanimate” cause, e.g. through stimulation of the body cell. Accordingly, the tumor cell is a mutated, i.e. degenerated, endogenous cell. After heated debates, the theory of the degenerate cell prevailed. Today's oncology [the study of tumor diseases] is based on this “degeneration”. The search for a pathogen has officially been stopped. Other research results were no longer required. To date, official cancer research has managed to ignore “alternative” research results or to fight inconvenient researchers. Therefore, here is a brief overview of research results that you have probably never heard of. 2. Alternative research results 2.1. Alfons Weber In 1967, the German cancer doctor and cell researcher Dr. Alfons Weber his research results. Accordingly, he could detect microparasites in every tumor tissue. Dr. Alfons Weber was convinced that the officially approved therapeutic measures against cancer would not help. You attack the tissue cell instead of the cancer-causing microparasites. His research evidence was largely ignored. They are “artifacts, water bubbles or artificial creations” or even “hallucinations of a madman”. His successful cancer treatment method with antimalarial drugs brought him years of legal proceedings and the revocation of his medical license. In 1972 he was admitted to a psychiatric hospital, although there was no evidence of psychiatric illness. 2.2. Helmut Keller, Germany Beginning in 1972, Keller treated certain tumors very successfully with an extract of the Venus flytrap. His drug “Carnivora” received provisional approval in Germany and was very popular with patients. A thorn in the side of the pharmaceutical industry. In 1986, the Federal Health Office was forced to ban the new drug again. Because Dr. Keller continued to treat his patients with Carnivora, he was sentenced to pay a fine of 10,000 DM. 2.3. Tamara Lebedeva In 1989, the Russian chemist and microbiologist was able to identify the ancient parasite Trichomonas as a cancer trigger. In her experience, to the untrained oncologist's eye, the flagellates would appear to be cancer cells. The Trichomonas are “masters of deception”. For example, they could transform from their elongated shape with threads and flagella into a round amoeba shape that would closely resemble human cells. In the amoeba form they form colonies and encapsulate themselves as necessary. Lebedeva recognized the disease trichomoniasis [disease of the oral cavity, intestines, genital organs or urethra caused by trichomonas] as the first stage of cancer. Their efforts to draw public attention to these research results failed. Lebedeva: “Every letter, every request to the Ministry of Health or other health care bodies is sent again to the National Oncological Center in Moscow, and the vernal message comes from there every time The obvious answer is that the discovery is not worth examining.” Dear viewers: These research results presented here are representative of many others. Why are they withheld from the public? Who has an interest in suppressing, defaming and even criminalizing alternative cancer research? Below we show how certain circles of high finance hijacked the healthcare system for their own purposes. 3. Transforming the healthcare system Let us turn to a family that went down in the annals of history as “great benefactors,” also known as philanthropists: the American Rockefeller family. Rockefeller Sr. controlled 90% of the entire US oil market around 1880. Around 1900, scientists discovered “petrochemistry” – the production of chemicals from petroleum. They began to produce herbal active ingredients synthetically. These could be patented and marketed at a high profit. Rockefeller's plan was to create a sales market for chemical medical products. However, Americans' preference for natural and herbal medicines stood in his way. Also, nearly half of the physicians and medical schools in the United States practiced holistic medicine. So how did Rockefeller Sr. conquer the medical field? 3.1. The Flexner Report Rockefeller's “companion in lucrative business” has always been Andrew Carnegie. Both were committed eugenicists. Eugenicists invest in population control and containment of so-called “inferior populations,” for example through forced sterilization. [Infertility – A Diabolical Agenda www.kla.tv/26028] Andrew Carnegie gained great wealth through the steel industry and early on earned a reputation as “a great humanitarian” through generous donations and the founding of institutions. For example, in 1905, Carnegie founded the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching [CFAT]. To implement Rockefeller's plan, the Carnegie Foundation commissioned educational theorist Abraham Flexner to conduct a study of American medical education. Flexner published his results in 1910, in the so-called “Flexner Report. This report put the medical field on the path Rockefeller wanted - with far-reaching consequences for the training of doctors. These were briefly:  All schools that did not teach according to “pharmachemical”, i.e. “scientific medicine”, lost their approval and all financial support. Of the former 155 medical schools in the USA and Canada, only 66 remained in 1935.  The remaining medical schools lost their independence.  The holistic approach to health and health care largely disappeared from teaching and training.  Chemically based drugs became the standard of science. The Americans coined the slogan “One pill for every disease.” Medicines of natural origin were defamed. Just two years later, the whole thing was repeated in Europe - with the same consequences. 3.2. Enforcement of the Flexner Report The Flexner Report was implemented via John D. Rockefeller Senior's “General Education Board” [GEB: Board for General Education]. The GEB is a foundation he founded in 1902. Through these funds went to colleges, universities and medical schools. They were supposed to make it easier for them to “restructure” in the spirit of the Rockefeller family. Participating: Abraham Flexner. In 1912 he moved to the GEB as deputy secretary. Flexner: "...Between 1919 and 1928, the General Education Board...contributed directly and indirectly half a billion dollars or more to the resources and endowments of American medical education." That equates to a not entirely altruistic $9.1 billion today. Two decades after the founding of the General Education Board, John D. Rockefeller Jr. founded the International Education Board [IEB: International Education Board]. At the international level, the IEB supported not only institutions but also individual scientists. It awarded hundreds of scholarships and grants to organizations in 39 different countries. In total, Rockefeller Jr. contributed more than $21 million to the IEB. That's worth $376 million today. The Rockefeller Foundation took over the duties of the International Education Board in 1938 and continued them. 3.3. Further foundations of the Rockefellers As you can see, John D. Rockefeller Sr. was a strategically minded man who “led medical education into the modern age” not out of pure do-gooder sentiment. Ultimately, through unfair business practices, he became an oil tycoon and, at the time, the richest man in the world ewinne. At this point it should not be denied that with the help of chemotherapy certain successes can be achieved in cancer treatment and human lives can be saved. But at what cost does this happen? Why are alternative research results and alternative therapies still vehemently suppressed? By what right does official cancer research massively block alternatives to chemotherapy? Why don't we hear about the fact that there is virtually no cancer in Malaysia because people there eat a so-called crab fruit? Or an example of Russian medicine: The closely networked therapist and singer Sara Bennet reports that for many doctors in Russia, cancer is no more important than a cold. Why don't we hear about Russian medicine, which is currently making such advances in cancer treatment? Why do those circles whose treatment methods produce such poor results that the cancer death rate has more than doubled after 110 years keep all alternatives under wraps? 6. Big Pharma: The masks are falling Did you know that a draft law “to strengthen the fight against dangerous sectarian developments” was submitted in France in November 2023 and is now on the verge of being cemented as law? This reveals at first glance how adamant Big Pharma wants to maintain control over the medical market. The text of the law reads: “The request to give up or refrain from therapeutic or prophylactic medical treatment is punished with one year in prison and a fine of 15,000 euros. The same penalties apply to provocation to practices that are presented as therapeutic or prophylactic for the people concerned, although it is obvious from the state of medical knowledge that these practices expose them to an immediate risk of death or injury resulting in permanent may result in mutilation or disability. If the provocation provided for in the first two subparagraphs has been complied with, the penalties are increased to three years imprisonment and a fine of 45,000 euros.” The new law is justified with the following words: "Given the public's enthusiasm for therapeutic practices that are not scientifically validated, the search for well-being and personal development, and due to the increase in training programs that award non-nationally recognized diplomas, patients may be abused or exposed to therapeutic abuses, particularly of a sectarian nature be." The French newspaper L'Express also argues: "This is sufficient to respond to the numerous cases in which people who rely on conspiracies and various alternative therapies recommend, for example, the abandonment of cancer treatments." The reasoning makes clear the actual motivations of the French legislator: The law is intended to ensure that the pharmaceutical complex can further expand control. Anyone who suggests another therapy that is not “scientifically validated” or does not correspond to “the current state of medical knowledge” should be silenced. We are already familiar with this procedure from the Flexner report. Question: Why does Big Pharma want to “take care of people’s well-being” in a dictatorial manner and, if necessary, against people’s free will? Is it perhaps the exact opposite of “charity and health” for everyone? 7. False flag bioweapons research The doctor and officer Heiko Schöning reveals a very interesting aspect in an interview: he places cancer research in a direct connection with bioweapons research. Now see short excerpts from the show. Schöning: “We are now in the age of biological weapons. This technical progress is possible. And if we go back, then we see, yes, there was an official ban on biological weapons in 1972. They were not allowed to be used, not produced, not stored, absolutely not. And, interestingly enough, US President Richard Nixon said that. But what is well documented is that Richard Nixon was the best trickster in the Mafia, in global organized crime. His official nickname was also Tricky Dick. Yes, and Nixon actually just hid and renamed bioweapons research in the USA. Because one of the main places in the USA was Fort Detrick. And what happened to all these bioweapons researchers and the facilities and the buildings? They've just been renamed. There was a new sign. And the sign said NCI [National Cancer Institute] - National Cancer Research Institute. You really have to understand that. The same researchers, the same buildings remained there, and it was now officially cancer research.” At the same time as the ban on bioweapons research, the National Cancer Act was passed by the American government. President Nixon promised $7 billion to “fight cancer” by 1976. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) suddenly became the largest and most influential of all US health institutes - or should we say "bioweapons institute". Schöning continues: “What are biological weapons? These are cell toxins. What are cancer therapeutics? Cell toxins. So what is the difference between bioweapon testing and cancer studies? The different spelling. And that's exactly what Nixon did. The sign was simply hung in Fort Detrick, no longer bioweapons research – National Cancer Research Institute.” Dear viewers, one thing must be clear to us: bioweapons usually have the purpose of killing inconspicuously! What can we expect from the bioweapons institutes – sorry, cancer research institutes – in the near future? Schöning continues: “And it was a cover, for example, a concealment that these bioweapons researchers suddenly spent decades researching a vaccination against cancer. This has now been forgotten again. And very recently, to continue with this, we hear today: mRNA vaccines, i.e. actual experimental gene therapies against cancer, are now being sold to us today. Voilà, after all the disaster with the so-called mRNA Covid vaccines, mRNA cancer vaccines should now also be made available to men and women. The Covid vaccination crimes with devastating effects, such as the development of turbo cancer, have not yet been dealt with. In the program “Explosion of turbo cancer after corona vaccination”, Kla.TV explained the connection between mRNA vaccination and extremely fast-growing tumors. And now new mRNA vaccinations are available. So it's hardly surprising that people's trust in pharmaceutical-controlled medicine is declining rapidly! Conclusion: 1. Unscrupulous money and power people like Rockefeller & Co. laid the foundation for the modern pharmaceutical industry and our healthcare system. 2. From the beginning they aim for absolute control of medical education and science. 3. Independent research is also radically opposed from the start, even if it is promising. 4. The “benefactor image” of foundations and institutions of the super-rich serves to conceal their true intentions: namely, the expansion of power and control. 5. Despite gigantic investments, cancer death rates are constantly increasing. 6. It is proven that behind cancer research there is also research into bioweapons with a big budget. Bioweapons usually have the purpose of killing unobtrusively and en masse! 7. Today we are at a point where there is a threat of a health dictatorial paternalism of citizens and highly dangerous coercive medical measures. The pharmaceutical industry, controlled by the Rockefellers of this world, turns out to be the real cancer. We ask ourselves: Can the official statements about cancer research be correct? When huge amounts of money have been pouring in for around 100 years and so little success has been recorded? The healing successes seem so small that they are barely enough to keep hope alive. The eternal hope of defeating cancer never lets the gigantic flow of money for dubious research dry up. An increasingly radical, dictatorial pharmaceutical complex is proving to be the real cancer. Now is the time to uncover the true causes and contributors to ever-increasing cancer rates. The beneficiaries of the toxins in food, air, soil, water and pharmaceutical products must be investigated. Because any paternalism by the pharmaceutical-controlled WHO and its vassals must be stopped! Short stopover: “Purely by chance” e.g

from beka.

Sources/Links: Datenlage Krebs de/wissenschaft/mensch/krebs-zahl-der-neuerkrankungen-wird-sich-bis-2040-weltweit-fast-verdoppeln-a-aa28085e-4727-4a14-9761-5f8002bd1bb3 https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/172573/umfrage/krebstote-in-deutschland/
Südkurier de/ueberregional/politik/120-Milliarden-Euro-fuer-die-Forschung-Warum-die-EU-jetzt-dem-Krebs-den-Kampf-ansagt;art410924,10030288 1. Historie der Krebsforschung Lenberg, W.O.: Jahrhundert-Skandal Krebs, ES-Verlag, Düsseldorf 1987, S. 36 Artikel „Krebs: Die verkannte Seuche?“ in https://www.zeitenschrift.com/artikel/krebs-die-verkannte-seuche
Lebedewa, Tamara: Krebserreger entdeckt! Die verblüffenden Erkenntnisse einer russischen Forscherin. Verlag Driediger, 11. Auflage 2022, S. 41. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiropterakarzinom
2. Alternative Forschungsergebnisse Alfons Weber Lenberg, W.O.: Jahrhundert-Skandal Krebs, ES-Verlag, Düsseldorf 1987, S. 36ff., 135-139. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfons_Weber_
(Mediziner,_1915) Helmut Keller Lenberg, W.O.: Jahrhundert-Skandal Krebs, ES-Verlag, Düsseldorf 1987, S. 24-26. Tamara Lebedewa https://www.volkskrankheit-parasiten.org/meta-studie/#table_contents1210
Artikel „Krebs: Die verkannte Seuche?“ in ZeitenSchrift 113/2023, S. 14-19 Zitat T. Lebedewa, in: Lebedewa, Tamara: Krebserreger entdeckt! Die verblüffenden Erkenntnisse einer russischen Forscherin. Verlag Driediger, 11. Auflage 2022, S. 13f. 3. Transformation des Gesundheitssystems https://www.ch.com/der-flexner-bericht-von-1910-rockefellers-hat-den-pharmazeutischen-medizinischen-industriekomplex-geschaffen-und-konsolidiert/
3.1 Der Flexner-Report Andrew Carnegie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Carnegie
Eugenik https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_von_Eugenik-Organisationen
https://kla.tv/26028
https://kla.tv/16194
John D. Rockefeller Sr. com/artikel/wie-die-medizin-dem-mammon-erlag com/pulse/how-rockefeller-founded-deep-state-pharma-waged-war-cures-mukhamedin Flexner-Report Zitat von Flexner,1910: https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2967338/
wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexner_Report com/watch?v=N2QOhECuodw gesellschaft-medizinische-ausbildung.org/files/ZMA-Archiv/1991/1/Loh%C3%B6lter_R-l.pdf, S. 2 3.2 Durchsetzung des Flexner-Reports Abraham Flexner https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockefeller-Stiftung
General Education Board https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexner_Report
gesellschaft-medizinische-ausbildung.org/files/ZMA-Archiv/1991/1/Loh%C3%B6lter_R-l.pdf, S. 3 International Education Board org/almanac/international-education-board/ rockarch.org/story/the-international-education-board-1923-1938/ 3.3 Weitere Gründungen der Rockefellers Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockefeller_University
The Rockefeller University Hospital org/clinicalresearch/mission-history https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klinische_Studie
4. Rockefeller finanziert die American Cancer Society https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Cancer_Society
org/almanac/american-cancer-society/ org/about-us/who-we-are/our-history.html com/pulse/how-rockefeller-founded-deep-state-pharma-waged-war-cures-mukhamedin Krebssterbedaten in den USA https://www.iarc.who.int/media/globocan/factsheets/populations/840-united-states-of-america-fact-sheet.pdf
Bevölkerung in den USA https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/19320/umfrage/gesamtbevoelkerung-der-usa/
Zitat Buch von Mullins In: Mullins, Eustace: Murder by injection, The National Council for Medical Research, Library of Congress Card Catalog No. 88-060694 5. Die Chemotherapie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemotherapie
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mustard_gas
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mustard_gas#Herstellung_von_S-Lost
Biowaffenforscher in den USA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einheit_731
Familie Adenauer-Zinsser-McCloy Schöning, Heiko: Angriff aufs Mikrobiom, Etica Media Verlag, 2023, www.corage.media,
ISBN 978 90 83 37 92 10; Seite 96-107 Schöning, Heiko; GAME OVER. COVID-19 / ANTHRAX-01, Blue Tiger Media Verlag, 2021, ISBN 978 94 93 26 20 96; Seite 291-296 Chemotherapie und Pharma Zitat Dt. Wirtschaftsnachrichten, 13.01.2014: https://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/2014/01/13/chemotherapie-milliarden-geschaeft-fuer-die-pharmaindustrie
Kosten der Chemotherapie https://www.meinmed.at/therapie/chemotherapie/1909
Russische Medizin – Sara Bennett Naturheilzentrum Oberland Schweiz: Konferenz: „Hat Gott uns verlassen?“ Referat Sara Bennet vom 28.3.2024 ab Minute 43:45 6. Big Pharma: Die Masken fallen https://www.fr.com/leg/pjl23-111.html?s=08
Zitat Begründung (durch den interministerielle Ausschuss zur Überwachung und Bekämpfung von Sektenmissbrauch), in: https://legitim.ch/gruseliger-gesetzesentwurf-die-franzoesische-regierung-will-alternativmediziner-und-verschwoerungstheoretiker-wegsperren/
7. Biowaffenforschung unter falscher Flagge Heiko Schöning Interview https://kla.tv/27249
Schöning, Heiko: Angriff aufs Mikrobiom, Etica Media Verlag, 2023, www.corage.media,
ISBN 978 90 83 37 92 10 Nixon und das NCI Lenberg, W.O.: Jahrhundert-Skandal Krebs, ES-Verlag, Düsseldorf 1987, S. 43. mRNA-Krebsimpfstoffe de/de/aktuelles/mRNA-Impfung-gegen-Krebs.html