This website uses cookies. Cookies help us to provide our services. By using our services, you consent to our use of cookies. Your data is safe with us. We do not pass on your analysis or contact data to third parties! Further information can be found in the data protection declaration.
Subtitle "Afrikaans" was produced by machine.Subtitle "አማርኛ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "العربية " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Ārāmāyâ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "azərbaycan dili " was produced by machine.Subtitle "беларуская мова " was produced by machine.Подзаглавието "България" е създадено от машина.Subtitle "বাংলা " was produced by machine.Subtitle "བོད་ཡིག" was produced by machine.Subtitle "босански" was produced by machine.Subtitle "català" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Cebuano" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ગુજરાતી" was produced by machine.Subtitle "corsu" was produced by machine.Podtitul "Čeština" byl vytvořen automaticky.Subtitle "Cymraeg" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Dansk" was produced by machine.Untertitel "Deutsch" wurde maschinell erzeugt.Subtitle "Untertitel" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Ελληνικά" was produced by machine.Subtitle "English" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Esperanto" was produced by machine.El subtítulo "Español" se generó automáticamente.Subtitle "Eesti" was produced by machine.Subtitle "euskara" was produced by machine.Subtitle "فارسی" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Suomi" was produced by machine.Le sous-titre "Français" a été généré automatiquement.Subtitle "Frysk" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Gaeilge" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Gàidhlig" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Galego" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Schwizerdütsch" was produced by machine.Subtitle "هَوُسَ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Ōlelo Hawaiʻi" was produced by machine.Subtitle "עברית" was produced by machine.Subtitle "हिन्दी" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Mẹo" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Hrvatski" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Kreyòl ayisyen " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Magyar" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Հայերեն" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Bahasa Indonesia " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Asụsụ Igbo " was produced by machine.Textun"Íslenska" var framkvæmt vélrænt.Sottotitoli "Italiano" sono stati generati automaticamente.Subtitle "日本語" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Basa Jawa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ქართული" was produced by machine.Subtitle "қазақ тілі " was produced by machine.Subtitle "ភាសាខ្មែរ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ಕನ್ನಡ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "한국어" was produced by machine.Subtitle "कोंकणी語" was produced by machine.Subtitle "کوردی" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Кыргызча" was produced by machine.Subtitle " lingua latina" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Lëtzebuergesch" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Lingala" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ພາສາ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Lietuvių" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Latviešu" was produced by machine.Subtitle "fiteny malagasy" was produced by machine.Subtitle "te reo Māori" was produced by machine.Subtitle "македонски јазик" was produced by machine.Subtitle "malayāḷaṁ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "မြန်မာစာ " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Монгол хэл" was produced by machine.Subtitle "मराठी" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Bahasa Malaysia" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Malti" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ဗမာစာ " was produced by machine.Subtitle "नेपाली" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Nederlands" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Norsk" was produced by machine.Subtitle "chiCheŵa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ਪੰਜਾਬੀ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Polska" was produced by machine.Subtitle "پښتو" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Português" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Română" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Язык жестов (Русский)" was produced by machine.Субтитры "Pусский" были созданы машиной.Subtitle "Kinyarwanda" was produced by machine.Subtitle "सिन्धी" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Deutschschweizer Gebärdensprache" was produced by machine.Subtitle "සිංහල" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Slovensky" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Slovenski" was produced by machine.Subtitle "gagana fa'a Samoa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "chiShona" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Soomaaliga" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Shqip" was produced by machine.Subtitle "србски" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Sesotho" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Basa Sunda" was produced by machine.Undertext "Svenska" är maskinell skapad.Subtitle "Kiswahili" was produced by machine.Subtitle "தமிழ்" was produced by machine.Subtitle "తెలుగు" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Тоҷикй" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ภาษาไทย" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ትግርኛ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Tagalog" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Türkçe" was produced by machine.Subtitle "татар теле" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Українська " was produced by machine.Subtitle "اردو" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Oʻzbek" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Tiếng Việt" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Serbšćina" was produced by machine.Subtitle "isiXhosa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ייִדיש" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Yorùbá" was produced by machine.Subtitle "中文" was produced by machine.Subtitle "isiZulu" was produced by machine.
kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV не носи отговорност за некачествен превод.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV nenese žádnou odpovědnost za chybné překlady.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV übernimmt keine Haftung für mangelhafte Übersetzung.kla.TV accepts no liability for inadequate translationkla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV no se hace responsable de traducciones incorrectas.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV n'assume aucune responsabilité en cas de mauvaise traduction.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV nem vállal felelősséget a hibás fordításértkla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV tekur enga ábyrgð á áræðanleika þýðingarinnarKla.TV non si assume alcuna responsabilità per traduzioni lacunose e/o errate.Kla.TV は、不適切な翻訳に対して一切の責任を負いません。kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV не несет ответственности за некачественный перевод.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.Kla.TV tar inget ansvar för felaktiga översättningar.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.
"The Christian Drosten File" brings to light little-known but momentous backgrounds that cast great doubt on the credibility of the "most sought-after man in the republic" (according to Stern). This also raises serious questions with regard to the entire Corona scenario....
[continue reading]
The German virologist Professor Dr. Christian Drosten is THE face of the current corona crisis! The weekly magazine Stern even headlined in March 2020: "The coronavirus has made virologist Christian Drosten the most sought-after man in the Republic. And a star." [1]
For it was Christian Drosten who developed the PCR corona test in January 2020, which from then on served as the standard method for detecting the coronavirus covid19 worldwide. As Institute Director of the Berlin Charité, he is a very influential advisor to the German government and participated as an expert in many government press conferences. Thus, through his assessments, he also significantly influenced far-reaching political decisions, such as the compulsory wearing of masks, the suspension of regular school lessons, or the closure of the entire catering industry.
Out of a series of awards, the award of the Federal Cross of Merit on Ribbon in 2005 and the Federal Cross of Merit 1st Class in 2020 stand out.
In this program, however, a file with four parts is now to be opened, which shows a completely different face of Christian Drosten and brings hardly known but momentous backgrounds to light:
"The Drosten File" Part 1: Christian Drosten and his mispredictions
Due to the large number of highest awards, one should expect that his assessments and forecasts will also come true in each case. Here are just two examples of his always worrying forecasts compared with actual developments:
Forecast 1: 2003 / SARS
"If the epidemic cannot be pushed back in the near future, there may be repeated cases of SARS. [...] If outbreaks of such pulmonary diseases were to occur regularly in certain countries, it could have a serious impact on their economies. An effective vaccine cannot be expected for at least one to two years."
Actual development: According to the WHO, since the beginning of the so-called SARS epidemic in 2003, there have been only 8,096 SARS cases worldwide with 774 deaths; in Germany, only 9 cases and not a single death.
Forecast 2: 2009 / Swine flu
"The disease is a serious common viral infection that produces significantly more severe side effects than anyone can imagine from the worst vaccine."
Although there was no reliable data on numbers of cases, Drosten urged people to get vaccinated against swine flu.
Actual development: The predicted epidemic never occurred. Nevertheless, vaccines were ordered by Western governments for several hundred million euros, but the vast majority of the population rejected them despite Drosten's urgent recommendation. Moreover, the vaccines caused far more serious damage than the swine flu itself.
Conclusion: Drosten's scary forecasts, which always aimed at the "standard solution vaccination", turned out to be fatal misjudgements resulting in gigantic economic damage.
How is it possible that Drosten continues to appear credible as THE advisor to the government with his repeated horror predictions?
"The Drosten File" Part 2: Christian Drosten and his doctoral degree
As Prof. Dr. Christian Drosten became probably the best-known scientist in Germany as a result of the Corona crisis, there were also increased inquiries about his doctoral thesis.
Strange inconsistencies came to light:
1. Inconsistency:
Drosten allegedly received his doctorate from Frankfurt's Goethe University in 2003. Surprisingly, however, the Frankfurt University Library was initially unable to provide a single copy of his doctoral thesis.
2. Inconsistency:
When asked by Dr. Markus Kühbacher, a scientist specializing in scientific fraud, the university's press spokesman stated that the copies had been damaged during water damage. According to Kühbacher, the press spokesman later had to admit that he had "communicated false factual claims to him regarding Mr. Drosten's dissertation." The German National Library also did not have a single copy before 2020. For promotions this is usually mandatory.
3. Inconsistency:
It is also very strange that in the catalog of the German National Library - in which all university publications must be listed - no entry for Christian Drosten can be found for the years 2000-2003.
4. Inconsistency:
On October 15, 2020, the Goethe University in Frankfurt/Main published a statement of correction regarding the "False allegations about the doctoral procedure of Prof. Dr. Christian Drosten". This shows that Mr. Drosten has been entitled to use the title Dr. med. since September 4, 2003.
This is very surprising, because in a WHO document he is already listed as Dr. in April 2003 - five months earlier.
These and other numerous inconsistencies prompted the lawyer Dr. Reiner Füllmich to refer to Drosten as the "Captain of Köpenick" in the extra-parliamentary Corona Investigation Committee.
On December 2, 2020, Kühbacher filed a lawsuit with the Regional Court of Stuttgart regarding the "deposit copies of Mr. Drosten's dissertation and their alleged storage in excessively moist conditions. These legal proceedings could bring further spicy inconsistencies to light.
However, things could get even more unpleasant for Drosten, as attorney Dr. Füllmich has already filed an initial claim for damages against Drosten on behalf of one of his clients who suffered damage as a result of the Corona measures. A class action lawsuit in the USA is in preparation.
Ultimately, it is not about his doctorate, but about the question of Christian Drosten's credibility. Why has he persistently remained silent for months and not clarified these serious allegations without reservation? This is certainly not conducive to his credibility!
"The Drosten File" Part 3: Christian Drosten and his PCR Corona Test
The corona PCR test for the detection of the coronavirus developed by Drosten in January 2020 at lightning speed is "the test of the year"! These test results are the legitimation for national governments worldwide to enforce most massive restrictions of fundamental rights against citizens!
As recently as 2014, Drosten said of this PCR test method: "the method is so sensitive that it can detect a single hereditary molecule of this virus. If such a pathogen, for example, flits across a nurse's nasal mucosa for a day without her getting sick or noticing anything else, she is suddenly a MERS case. Where previously deathly ill people were reported, now mild cases and people who are actually perfectly healthy are suddenly included in the reporting statistics. This could also explain the explosion in the number of cases in Saudi Arabia. On top of that, the local media have made an incredible fuss about it."
Doesn't this quote from Drosten accurately reflect the current Corona situation?
"The reporting statistics suddenly include perfectly healthy people and distort them!"
"Explosion of case numbers!"
"Media boil the matter incredibly high!"
Did Drosten choose this PCR method with calculation to trigger a "test pandemic"?
A recent scientific research paper by 22 top-class scientists substantiates this suspicion, as they deny the scientific basis of the Drosten study, which served as the basis for the introduction of the test by the WHO.
Also first court decisions confirm the unscientific nature of the Drosten study and his Corona test!
One man has significantly steered the entire corona scenario with his unscientific study and his unsuitable corona PCR test based on it: Christian Drosten! Not only he himself, but also his developed test proves to be implausible upon closer examination!
"The Drosten File" Part 4: Christian Drosten and his manifold entanglements
A decisive measure for the credibility of scientists is their neutrality and impartiality!
1. Is a neutrality and impartiality of Drosten possible at all - in view of his connection to Olfert Landt?
Olfert Landt is one of the regular co-authors of Drosten's studies - including the current Corona study. He is also the owner of the Berlin Biotech company TIB Molbiol Syntheselabor GmbH, which produces corona PCR tests. Drosten and Landt have apparently discovered a successful "business model": in the case of pandemics and the most diverse virus outbreaks, they jointly develop the PCR test for them: this was already the case in 2002/2003 for SARS, in 2011 for EHEC, in 2012 for MERS, in 2016 for the Zika virus, in 2017 for yellow fever. Always the same trick pattern, which they now resorted to again for the coronavirus. Landt also admitted this to the Berliner Zeitung: "The test, the design, the development, came from the Charité. We just immediately converted that into a kit format. And if you don't have this virus, which was initially only available in Wuhan, we can make a synthetic gene to simulate the virus genome. We did that very quickly." Right at the start of the Corona crisis, Landt and his Berlin-based biotech company were producing Corona test kits for 1,500,000 Corona tests per week, and by February they had already tripled their sales.
In the meantime, he has probably reaped gigantic profits from these tests. It is doubtful that Landt will pocket the entire economic success and that Drosten will be left with only his reputation.
Regardless of the extent to which Drosten derived personal benefit from this, the question arises as to how it can be that developments are pushed forward with public funds and subsequently private companies profit from them to such an extent?
2. Is neutrality and impartiality on Drosten's part even possible - given his ties to the pharmaceutical industry?
Drosten received, among others:
• the "Förderpreis für Klinische Infektiologie", sponsored by Aventis Deutschland Pharma GmbH and endowed with 5,000 euros,
• the "Diagnostics Award of the European Society for Clinical Virology" of the U.S. pharmaceutical company Abbott Laboratories, which is endowed with 2,500 euros and is associated with further interesting privileges for the award winner, and
via the Charité Berlin, of which Drosten is the institute director, currently in December 2019 and March 2020 around $335,000 from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This foundation is by no means altruistic, but is known for its proximity to the vaccine industry.
Do Drosten's awards and grants give rise to conflicts of interest that in the past led him to always promote vaccination as a way out?
The current corona crisis also seems to substantiate this suspicion, as Drosten himself does not shy away from an illegal violation of the professional code of conduct of the state medical association by recommending certain vaccine manufacturers.
Therefore, don't Drosten's statements and studies have to be completely reevaluated from the perspective of bias? Who would believe a scientist who propagates smoking as harmless and at the same time receives awards and funds from the tobacco industry?
CONCLUSIONS:
Fatal mispredictions, numerous unexplained inconsistencies regarding his doctoral thesis, a hastily developed "corona PCR test" with fundamental scientific flaws, and an undreamt-of quagmire of financial entanglements deprive Christian Drosten of any credibility!
If the central key figure in the entire Corona crisis turns out to be untrustworthy upon closer examination, this raises serious questions:
1. On the basis of this unscientific foundation, shouldn't the entire corona event, with the inevitable threat of economic and financial collapse of entire nations, finally be investigated for masterminds and profiteers in the background?
2. Could it not therefore amount to a staged takeover of power and even lead to the introduction of digital surveillance of entire nations under the pretext of fighting a pandemic?
3. Why do the mass media responsible for critical reporting not reveal the "Drosten file", but rather even keep it under wraps?
Dear viewers,
Do you also think that these background facts should be known to everyone? Then help to bring the "Drosten file" to the light of day without delay.
Only a movement of the people themselves can ensure that the silence of monopoly media with the same control is broken and it comes to a public discussion!
You can make a contribution to it, by making these hidden connections public! Spread therefore this enlightening video! Inform as many of your acquaintances as possible by mail, via WhatsApp, Twitter, Vimeo or post the video on Facebook. We fade in the link to this broadcast!
28.05.2021 | www.kla.tv/18870
The German virologist Professor Dr. Christian Drosten is THE face of the current corona crisis! The weekly magazine Stern even headlined in March 2020: "The coronavirus has made virologist Christian Drosten the most sought-after man in the Republic. And a star." [1] For it was Christian Drosten who developed the PCR corona test in January 2020, which from then on served as the standard method for detecting the coronavirus covid19 worldwide. As Institute Director of the Berlin Charité, he is a very influential advisor to the German government and participated as an expert in many government press conferences. Thus, through his assessments, he also significantly influenced far-reaching political decisions, such as the compulsory wearing of masks, the suspension of regular school lessons, or the closure of the entire catering industry. Out of a series of awards, the award of the Federal Cross of Merit on Ribbon in 2005 and the Federal Cross of Merit 1st Class in 2020 stand out. In this program, however, a file with four parts is now to be opened, which shows a completely different face of Christian Drosten and brings hardly known but momentous backgrounds to light: "The Drosten File" Part 1: Christian Drosten and his mispredictions Due to the large number of highest awards, one should expect that his assessments and forecasts will also come true in each case. Here are just two examples of his always worrying forecasts compared with actual developments: Forecast 1: 2003 / SARS "If the epidemic cannot be pushed back in the near future, there may be repeated cases of SARS. [...] If outbreaks of such pulmonary diseases were to occur regularly in certain countries, it could have a serious impact on their economies. An effective vaccine cannot be expected for at least one to two years." Actual development: According to the WHO, since the beginning of the so-called SARS epidemic in 2003, there have been only 8,096 SARS cases worldwide with 774 deaths; in Germany, only 9 cases and not a single death. Forecast 2: 2009 / Swine flu "The disease is a serious common viral infection that produces significantly more severe side effects than anyone can imagine from the worst vaccine." Although there was no reliable data on numbers of cases, Drosten urged people to get vaccinated against swine flu. Actual development: The predicted epidemic never occurred. Nevertheless, vaccines were ordered by Western governments for several hundred million euros, but the vast majority of the population rejected them despite Drosten's urgent recommendation. Moreover, the vaccines caused far more serious damage than the swine flu itself. Conclusion: Drosten's scary forecasts, which always aimed at the "standard solution vaccination", turned out to be fatal misjudgements resulting in gigantic economic damage. How is it possible that Drosten continues to appear credible as THE advisor to the government with his repeated horror predictions? "The Drosten File" Part 2: Christian Drosten and his doctoral degree As Prof. Dr. Christian Drosten became probably the best-known scientist in Germany as a result of the Corona crisis, there were also increased inquiries about his doctoral thesis. Strange inconsistencies came to light: 1. Inconsistency: Drosten allegedly received his doctorate from Frankfurt's Goethe University in 2003. Surprisingly, however, the Frankfurt University Library was initially unable to provide a single copy of his doctoral thesis. 2. Inconsistency: When asked by Dr. Markus Kühbacher, a scientist specializing in scientific fraud, the university's press spokesman stated that the copies had been damaged during water damage. According to Kühbacher, the press spokesman later had to admit that he had "communicated false factual claims to him regarding Mr. Drosten's dissertation." The German National Library also did not have a single copy before 2020. For promotions this is usually mandatory. 3. Inconsistency: It is also very strange that in the catalog of the German National Library - in which all university publications must be listed - no entry for Christian Drosten can be found for the years 2000-2003. 4. Inconsistency: On October 15, 2020, the Goethe University in Frankfurt/Main published a statement of correction regarding the "False allegations about the doctoral procedure of Prof. Dr. Christian Drosten". This shows that Mr. Drosten has been entitled to use the title Dr. med. since September 4, 2003. This is very surprising, because in a WHO document he is already listed as Dr. in April 2003 - five months earlier. These and other numerous inconsistencies prompted the lawyer Dr. Reiner Füllmich to refer to Drosten as the "Captain of Köpenick" in the extra-parliamentary Corona Investigation Committee. On December 2, 2020, Kühbacher filed a lawsuit with the Regional Court of Stuttgart regarding the "deposit copies of Mr. Drosten's dissertation and their alleged storage in excessively moist conditions. These legal proceedings could bring further spicy inconsistencies to light. However, things could get even more unpleasant for Drosten, as attorney Dr. Füllmich has already filed an initial claim for damages against Drosten on behalf of one of his clients who suffered damage as a result of the Corona measures. A class action lawsuit in the USA is in preparation. Ultimately, it is not about his doctorate, but about the question of Christian Drosten's credibility. Why has he persistently remained silent for months and not clarified these serious allegations without reservation? This is certainly not conducive to his credibility! "The Drosten File" Part 3: Christian Drosten and his PCR Corona Test The corona PCR test for the detection of the coronavirus developed by Drosten in January 2020 at lightning speed is "the test of the year"! These test results are the legitimation for national governments worldwide to enforce most massive restrictions of fundamental rights against citizens! As recently as 2014, Drosten said of this PCR test method: "the method is so sensitive that it can detect a single hereditary molecule of this virus. If such a pathogen, for example, flits across a nurse's nasal mucosa for a day without her getting sick or noticing anything else, she is suddenly a MERS case. Where previously deathly ill people were reported, now mild cases and people who are actually perfectly healthy are suddenly included in the reporting statistics. This could also explain the explosion in the number of cases in Saudi Arabia. On top of that, the local media have made an incredible fuss about it." Doesn't this quote from Drosten accurately reflect the current Corona situation? "The reporting statistics suddenly include perfectly healthy people and distort them!" "Explosion of case numbers!" "Media boil the matter incredibly high!" Did Drosten choose this PCR method with calculation to trigger a "test pandemic"? A recent scientific research paper by 22 top-class scientists substantiates this suspicion, as they deny the scientific basis of the Drosten study, which served as the basis for the introduction of the test by the WHO. Also first court decisions confirm the unscientific nature of the Drosten study and his Corona test! One man has significantly steered the entire corona scenario with his unscientific study and his unsuitable corona PCR test based on it: Christian Drosten! Not only he himself, but also his developed test proves to be implausible upon closer examination! "The Drosten File" Part 4: Christian Drosten and his manifold entanglements A decisive measure for the credibility of scientists is their neutrality and impartiality! 1. Is a neutrality and impartiality of Drosten possible at all - in view of his connection to Olfert Landt? Olfert Landt is one of the regular co-authors of Drosten's studies - including the current Corona study. He is also the owner of the Berlin Biotech company TIB Molbiol Syntheselabor GmbH, which produces corona PCR tests. Drosten and Landt have apparently discovered a successful "business model": in the case of pandemics and the most diverse virus outbreaks, they jointly develop the PCR test for them: this was already the case in 2002/2003 for SARS, in 2011 for EHEC, in 2012 for MERS, in 2016 for the Zika virus, in 2017 for yellow fever. Always the same trick pattern, which they now resorted to again for the coronavirus. Landt also admitted this to the Berliner Zeitung: "The test, the design, the development, came from the Charité. We just immediately converted that into a kit format. And if you don't have this virus, which was initially only available in Wuhan, we can make a synthetic gene to simulate the virus genome. We did that very quickly." Right at the start of the Corona crisis, Landt and his Berlin-based biotech company were producing Corona test kits for 1,500,000 Corona tests per week, and by February they had already tripled their sales. In the meantime, he has probably reaped gigantic profits from these tests. It is doubtful that Landt will pocket the entire economic success and that Drosten will be left with only his reputation. Regardless of the extent to which Drosten derived personal benefit from this, the question arises as to how it can be that developments are pushed forward with public funds and subsequently private companies profit from them to such an extent? 2. Is neutrality and impartiality on Drosten's part even possible - given his ties to the pharmaceutical industry? Drosten received, among others: • the "Förderpreis für Klinische Infektiologie", sponsored by Aventis Deutschland Pharma GmbH and endowed with 5,000 euros, • the "Diagnostics Award of the European Society for Clinical Virology" of the U.S. pharmaceutical company Abbott Laboratories, which is endowed with 2,500 euros and is associated with further interesting privileges for the award winner, and via the Charité Berlin, of which Drosten is the institute director, currently in December 2019 and March 2020 around $335,000 from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This foundation is by no means altruistic, but is known for its proximity to the vaccine industry. Do Drosten's awards and grants give rise to conflicts of interest that in the past led him to always promote vaccination as a way out? The current corona crisis also seems to substantiate this suspicion, as Drosten himself does not shy away from an illegal violation of the professional code of conduct of the state medical association by recommending certain vaccine manufacturers. Therefore, don't Drosten's statements and studies have to be completely reevaluated from the perspective of bias? Who would believe a scientist who propagates smoking as harmless and at the same time receives awards and funds from the tobacco industry? CONCLUSIONS: Fatal mispredictions, numerous unexplained inconsistencies regarding his doctoral thesis, a hastily developed "corona PCR test" with fundamental scientific flaws, and an undreamt-of quagmire of financial entanglements deprive Christian Drosten of any credibility! If the central key figure in the entire Corona crisis turns out to be untrustworthy upon closer examination, this raises serious questions: 1. On the basis of this unscientific foundation, shouldn't the entire corona event, with the inevitable threat of economic and financial collapse of entire nations, finally be investigated for masterminds and profiteers in the background? 2. Could it not therefore amount to a staged takeover of power and even lead to the introduction of digital surveillance of entire nations under the pretext of fighting a pandemic? 3. Why do the mass media responsible for critical reporting not reveal the "Drosten file", but rather even keep it under wraps? Dear viewers, Do you also think that these background facts should be known to everyone? Then help to bring the "Drosten file" to the light of day without delay. Only a movement of the people themselves can ensure that the silence of monopoly media with the same control is broken and it comes to a public discussion! You can make a contribution to it, by making these hidden connections public! Spread therefore this enlightening video! Inform as many of your acquaintances as possible by mail, via WhatsApp, Twitter, Vimeo or post the video on Facebook. We fade in the link to this broadcast!
from kw / str
https://www.deutschland.de/en/topic/knowledge/christian-drosten-corona-researcher-and-government-advisor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Drosten
Part 1: Christian Drosten and his mispredictions 1. SARS https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/biuz.200390097
(Link führt ins Leere) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/biuz.200390097
https://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/table2004_04_21/en/
2. Schweinegrippe / Swine flu https://www.kma-online.de/aktuelles/panorama/detail/zweite-welle-hat-begonnen-tote-erwartet-a-18682
https://www.spiegel.de/gesundheit/diagnose/schweinegrippe-impfstoff-pandemrix-risiken-wurden-ignoriert-a-1229144.html
Part 2: Christian Drosten and his doctorate https://www.corodok.de/drosten-dissertation-verschluss/
https://mobile.twitter.com/Kuehbacher/status/1331958955757740033
https://plagiatsgutachten.com/blog/christian-drosten/
https://aktuelles.uni-frankfurt.de/aktuelles/falschbehauptungen-zum-promotionsverfahren-von-prof-dr-christian-drosten/
http://web.archive.org/web/20030423125938/https://www.who.int/csr/sars/2003_04_16/en/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSLgvxQNano
https://t.me/ReinerFuellmich/88
https://www.fuldaerzeitung.de/panorama/corona-luege-reiner-fuellmich-virologe-christian-drosten-lothar-wieler-rki-goettingen-anwalt-lockdown-90096522.html
https://twitter.com/Kuehbacher/status/1334065538834849794
Part 3: Christian Drosten and his PCR corona test https://www.wiwo.de/technologie/forschung/virologe-drosten-im-gespraech-2014-die-who-kann-nur-empfehlungen-aussprechen/9903228-2.html
www.kla.tv/17757
www.kla.tv/17953
www.kla.tv/17530
Part 4: Christian Drosten and his manifold entanglements http://www.laborjournal-archiv.de/epaper/LJ_20_04/43/#zoom=z
https://www.dzif.de/en/zika-and-chikungunya-viruses-diagnostic-pitfalls
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/23/11/17-1131_article
https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/gesundheit-oekologie/fuer-panikkaeufe-ist-unsere-firma-zu-klein-li.79753
https://taz.de/Produzent-von-Corona-Tests/!5671485/
https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/info/16-Coronavirus-Update-Wir-brauchen-Abkuerzungen-bei-der-Impfstoffzulassung,podcastcoronavirus140.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Drosten
https://www.aerzteblatt.de/archiv/43328/Verleihungen
https://www.escv.eu/awards/the-abbott-diagnostic-award/
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-We-Work/Quick-Links/Grants-Database/Grants/2019/12/INV-004308
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-We-Work/Quick-Links/Grants-Database/Grants/2020/03/INV-005971
https://corona-transition.org/irrefuhrende-werbung-falschaussagen-prof-drosten-verstosst-gegen-berufsordnung