Urgent warning: EU Commission gives approval of vaccination for children - how trustworthy is EMA's assessment really?

19.07.2021 | www.kla.tv/19319

EU to buy up to 1.8 billion additional BionTech vaccine doses The vaccine will be used primarily to vaccinate children and boost immunizations. https://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/international/neuer-vertrag-eu-kauft-bis-zu-1-8-milliarden-zusaetzliche-biontech-impfdosen/27173792.html?ticket=ST-6867844-3eMPevYqMdYm0XtblHNQ-ap3 EU Commission approves Biontech vaccine for children 12 years and older https://www.spiegel.de/ausland/corona-impfung-von-kindern-eu-laesst-biontech-ab-12-jahren-zu-a-3d42539a-821c-4506-b4c9-7969c051de5c If a Corona vaccine is approved by the EU Commission, this is preceded by an assessment by the EMA - as is also the case for children aged 12 and over. The EMA is the European Medicines Agen-cy and as such is responsible for testing and evaluating vaccines. The EU Commission and subse-quently all EU governments rely on its recommendations: Following a recommendation by the EMA on Friday, the EU Commission officially granted ap-proval, according to its own information. https://www.diepresse.com/5987438/auch-die-eu-erteilt-zulassung-fur-biontech-impfstoff-fur-kinder-ab-12-jahren The assessment of the EMA thus has enormous significance for the health of 440 million people within the EU and great importance for the pharmaceutical companies. Because each time the EU Commission granted approval for a Corona vaccine on the basis of the EMA recommendation, tens of millions of vaccine doses were sold within the EU. This is why, Kla.TV is now investigating the question that is currently of utmost urgency for all people: How safe and trustworthy is the EMA's assessment? The mRNA vaccines are basically, novel technologies that have never been used before in the mass production of vaccines. The pharmaceutical companies not only made all Covid vaccines available within a few months, but also applied for approval for them, without prior long-term studies. The EMA did the evaluation in a fast-track procedure and already issued a recommendation within just a few weeks. All this, while internationally recognized virologists and immunologists issued extreme warnings against their use. Below - representative of numerous such warning cries from the scientific community - are five weighty expert voices that have not escaped the EMA's attention: 1. Geert Vanden Bossche - The Belgian virus expert has worked in the field of infection research and vaccine development for the pharmaceutical companies Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline, as well as for the organization GAVI and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. He himself has also devel-oped vaccines. "One of the world's leading virologists and a strong proponent of vaccines is sounding the alarm. Mass vaccination against Corona would trigger a global catastrophe of epic proportions, says top virologist Geert Vanden Bossche. [...] Vanden Bossche is so concerned about current vaccination efforts that he has issued an urgent appeal to the United Nations organization to immediately halt all vaccination campaigns against the Corona virus worldwide. If this does not happen, much more infectious virus variants would only intensify and eventually cause mass human deaths." 2nd Dr. Michael Yeadon - the ex-Pfizer vice president and head of research made clear: "There is absolutely no need for vaccines in order to stop the pandemic. You can't plan to vac-cinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn't been extensively tested in hu-mans" Professor Yaedon, who has 23 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry, states un-equivocally that the ultimate goal of the current vaccination regime can only be a mass depopulation event. In a warning letter, he addressed the EMA in view of this as early as December 2020, and together with Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a German pulmonary specialist and former head of the public health department, submitted a request for the immediate suspension of all Covid vaccine trials that were ongoing at the time. 3. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi - the renowned German virologist and specialist in infectious disease epide-miology is also very concerned: "Here we are dealing in Europe, in Austria, in Germany with a completely new type of vaccine. These vaccines are gene-based. This is not a normal conventional vaccine. [...] The effect carries a very high risk potential." Dr. Bhakdi, along with twelve prominent scientists and physicians, also approached the EMA in February 2021. In a letter, they strongly warned the EMA of the risk that Corona vaccines could cause blood clots. 4 Prof. Dr. Dolores Cahill - an Irish immunologist also warned against vaccinations with the novel mRNA technology: "If the vaccinated come into contact with wild Corona viruses a few months after vaccination, their immune system will in many cases react with a lethal cytokine storm [ex-planation: cytokines = proteins]. This is because the vaccine mRNA genetically modifies the body's cells to produce the corona virus spike protein. Later, when a new corona virus activates the im-mune system, it recognizes the self-produced spike proteins as a threat and launches a major at-tack against the body's own cells. The consequences are a septic shock and multiple organ fail-ures, which generally ends in death.” 5. Luc Montagnier - the French Nobel Prize winner and virologist, known for the discovery of the AIDS pathogen HIV, calls the mass vaccinations a serious mistake. He blames the Corona vaccina-tions for the mutations of the Corona virus. Quote, "The history books will show that, because it's the vaccination that creates the variants." In addition, Montagnier blames the vaccines for the rising death rates among young people. After the vaccines received approval in record time, despite such warnings, and mass vaccination began, numerous deaths directly related to the vaccines occurred in many European countries. Likewise, the predicted mutations that virologist Luc Montagnier warned about are now occurring in droves. Kla.TV's program "Urgent wake-up call: thousands die after Corona vaccination" revealed what happened overall and in particular in German nursing homes shortly after the start of Corona vac-cinations. The reports of thousands of deaths directly related to the vaccination are alarming. After numerous such incidents became known everywhere and understandably caused fear and concern among the population, several European governments stopped the AstraZeneca vaccination for the time being . How does the EMA deal with such incidents? As it is equally responsible for the ongoing monitoring of the safety of medicines already approved in the EU, the EMA again subjected the occurrence of deaths to scrutiny - with the astonishing re-sult: EMA gives another green light for AstraZeneca. The EU Medicines Agency considers the vaccine safe and recommends: Keep vaccinating! Johnson & Johnson - EMA gives green light for vaccine The European Medicines Agency (EMA) rates the benefits of Johnson & Johnson's coronavirus vaccine higher than the risks. How is it possible that despite the damage and deaths that have already occurred, and especially despite weighty warnings about vaccine damage and long-term effects, the EMA ignores all of this? How can it continue to rate Corona vaccines as "safe" and now even approve them for children 12 years and older? Also against the background that in the database of the EMA as of 18.5.2021 no less than 420,000 suspected cases of adverse reactions and 7,207 deaths from the EU states are reg-istered in connection with the Corona vaccines. Kla.TV received information from various sources about worrying entanglements in connection with the EMA, which require closer investigation in view of this large-scale vaccination campaign. Already in 2010, it became known that the then director of the EMA, Thomas Lönngren immediate-ly after his departure from EMA, moved to a consulting firm of the pharmaceutical industry, for whose supervision and control he had previously been responsible. With the EMA's approval, he also became a member of advisory boards of various pharmaceutical manufacturers. Only after protests from five international organizations did Thomas Lönngren have to sign a ludicrous restriction, ac-cording to which he was allowed to rejoin pharmaceutical companies after only two years. It is also worth taking a look at the EMA's funding. The annual budget averages 300 million euros. About 80 percent of this budget comes from fees paid to the EMA by pharmaceutical companies. Thus, the EMA is largely financed by money from the pharmaceutical industry! In the crucial phase before the testing and approval of the Corona vaccines, Emer Cooke, was ap-pointed in November 2020, as new EMA director. Austrian National Council Member Gerald Hauser commented: "And if you look at Dr. Emer Cooke's resume now, may I share this with you, take a look at this. She has been and has held a wide variety of positions in the pharmaceutical in-dustry since 1985. It is further interesting to note that she was a board member of EFPIA from 1991 to 1998. And do you know what the EFPIA is? EFPIA is the lobbying organization of the largest European pharmaceutical companies. And do you know, she spent eight years lobbying for the Big 30 of the European pharmaceutical industry. And do you know who their client was? [...] Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, and so on and so forth. So the Dr. Emer Cooke, who was appointed to the EMA board in mid-November 2020, has worked for the phar-maceutical industry all her life. She has lobbied for the pharmaceutical industry in an executive capacity and is now responsible for the approval and for the control and for efficacy of vaccines [...]." Other weighty facts show that Dr. Cooke is obviously mixing things up in her position as EMA boss and continues to act like a pharmaceutical lobbyist: When there was a demand from the U.S. presi-dent to release the patents for Corona vaccines - which secure billions in sales for the pharmaceutical companies - Dr. Cooke immediately stepped into action and stood protectively in front of the phar-maceutical companies. EMA boss opposes patent release for vaccines In the discussion about a possible release of patents for vaccines against the corona virus, the head of the European Medicines Agency (EMA), Emer Cooke, has spoken out against the idea. While Dr. Cooke protects the patents of the pharmaceutical giants, they recently caused everyone to sit up and take notice, when it became known that they are already raking in billions in profits. Dr. Cooke also made striking remarks during the testing process that evaluated BionTech/Pfizer's vaccine for children. She was able apparently, to promise in the midst of the testing phase that ap-proval would be granted: EMA director Emer Cooke has defined June as the target, but approval could come a little faster. Dr. Cooke even made the following announcement: "We are trying to see if we can accelerate this to the end of May." Another vaccine release that will generate billions more in profits for pharmaceutical companies. Doesn't this give the impression that the interests of the pharmaceutical companies are being sup-ported here rather than the health of the population? The EU Commission, which for its part relies on the EMA for the approval of the Corona vaccines, stated in its official press statement "Questions and Answers on the Approval Procedure" that the EMA works independently of party politics. That may well be true. But is it not above all crucial and in the interest of the population that such an authority is independent of pharmaceutical lob-bies? Regarding liability for vaccine damage, the EU Commission states the following in the same press report: "All EU states have jointly decided to take the path to a conditional marketing authorization for the vaccine that is valid throughout Europe." This conditional marketing authorization requires clearance and ongoing monitoring by the EMA. "Under a conditional EU marketing authorization, the marketing authorization holder, i.e., the manufacturing pharmaceutical company, is liable." What the majority of the population is not aware of, however, is that the pharmaceutical companies have already covered themselves in the contracts with the EU Commission for the event of wide-spread vaccination damage and the occurrence of vaccination deaths. AstraZeneca provided for the eventuality of vaccine victims suing for damages. The EU's original secret contract with the vaccine manufacturer states in black and white that the EU will reimburse AstraZeneca for all claims for damages, including any legal costs. The contracts with Pfizer and Moderna were also secret, but have now been made public. It also emerges from these contracts that neither Pfizer nor Moderna have to provide a guarantee of effica-cy, nor do they accept responsibility for any damage caused by the preparations. In plain language, this means: The pharmaceutical companies are liable for any damage that occurs, but are then reimbursed by the EU. So, it is not the pharmaceutical company that pays for the damage, but the EU taxpayers. The entire costs for vaccination damages are imposed on the population! The inter-dependencies and connections highlighted in this program weigh heavily. If the warnings mentioned at the beginning are true, the lives of millions of people are at stake - recently also those of millions of children. While the public is led to believe that the EMA's tests and recommendations are safe, the European Commission is covering up the EMA's links with the pharmaceutical industry. The European Com-mission has the power to withdraw approval at any time! But what does it do? It continues to argue every vaccination approval with the assessment of the EMA and transfers the entire costs of the vaccination damage on to the shoulders of the citizens. This is a huge crime against its own people! Therefore this obvious fraud of the population requires an immediate legal intervention and justice! This is why we ask you - dear viewers - please file a criminal complaint with the public prosecutor's office and present the carefully researched contexts shown here. Also, public pressure from the people on politicians and the media must quickly become so great that they cannot continue to refuse a public discourse involving all experts and expert voices. There-fore, please send these facts to media outlets and journalists with an urgent request to report on such contexts. Please also inform national (!) politicians about the content of this broadcast and ask them to act immediately. Everyone should hear about these warnings and expert voices for his or her own vaccination deci-sion or that of his or her own children in time - where this is still possible - and have the interconnec-tions of the EMA before his or her eyes. Again, please help this informing video reach everyone! Forward the link to the broadcast to as many of your friends, colleagues and relatives as possible.

from mw

Sources/Links: https://orf.at/stories/3193191
https://www.rtl.de/cms/corona-impfstoff-ohne-langzeitstudien-drohen-uns-noch-boese-ueberraschungen-4669177.html
https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/
https://unser-mitteleuropa.com/ex-pfizer-vizepraesident-die-regierungen-luegen-euch-an-und-bereiten-eine-massenentvoelkerung-vor/
https://2020news.de/dr-wodarg-und-dr-yeadon-beantragen-den-stopp-saemtlicher-corona-impfstudien-und-rufen-zum-mitzeichnen-der-petition-auf/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4pIQ8zJ8Jc
https://corona-blog.net/2021/03/14/brief-von-prof-bhakdi-und-kollegen-an-die-ema-verdacht-blutgerinnungsstoerungen-durch-covid-impfstoffe/
https://www.wochenblick.at/prof-fuer-molekulargenetik-dr-cahill-warnt-vor-mrna-nebenwirkungen/
https://www.wochenblick.at/nobelpreistraeger-warnt-in-jedem-land-folgt-die-todeskurve-der-impfkurve/
https://tkp.at/2021/05/19/massive-impf-nebenwirkungen-sprengen-ema-datenbank
https://www.der-arzneimittelbrief.de/nachrichten/ueberlaeufer-ema-chef-geht-zur-industrie/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqH9CoXXYIs
https://ec.europa.eu/germany/news/20201215-biontech-impfstoff_de
https://tkp.at/2021/04/20/vertraege-der-eu-kommission-mit-pfizer-und-moderna-geleakt-rechtsanwaltskanzlei-beurteilt-sie-als-ungueltig/
https://apa.at/faktencheck/corona-impfhersteller-in-eu-prinzipiell-haftbar