Dr. Gerd Reuther: Vaccinations, a success story?

19.07.2024 | www.kla.tv/29798

In school books you can read how first smallpox and then one disease after another was defeated by "safe and effective" vaccinations. But is this really true? This question is addressed by Univ. Doz. Dr. Gerd Reuther, radiologist and medical historian. Dr. Reuther has long been known for his criticism of pharmaceutical-dominated medicine and expressed this in his Spiegel bestseller "The Deceived Patient". In his lecture, Dr. Gerd Reuther uses the example of the smallpox vaccination and sources from medical history to show what consequences compulsory vaccination against smallpox had on the population. According to Dr. Reuther, smallpox was a harmless disease, but vaccination against smallpox led to tens of thousands of deaths. With vaccination came death from smallpox, so to speak! According to Dr. Reuther, the 300 year history of vaccination could be equated to a single health crime. Hear for yourself what Dr. Reuther has to say about vaccinations and in particular about smallpox vaccination. The lecture was held as part of the MWGFD symposium on the topic of "Vaccine approval, vaccination recommendation, compulsory vaccination - is the data sufficient?" So please enjoy, please enjoy with me the certainly extremely entertaining lecture by our esteemed colleague Dr. Gerd Reuther entitled "Vaccinations, a success story?" Univ. Doz. Dr. Gerd Reuther: "Actually, the 300 years of vaccination history are a single health crime. For reasons of time, however, I will only talk about one vaccination. However, there are 200 years of vaccination history, namely In the first 200 years, it was only about the smallpox vaccination. And this smallpox vaccination happened just like it is now with Covid-19. It was about coercion, about penalties, about a lot of money, in individual cases even more money than today. And it was about doing something that had no evidence, and the damage was covered up. Some people might say, can you compare smallpox and Covid? Covid, that was just the flu. But smallpox? That was a really terrible disease. I have brought you this one picture here, which you will see again and again. Interestingly, you always see the same pictures of smallpox on the internet and in books. In the days of photography and film, there were not so many smallpox patients that you could keep bringing in new ones. But as early as the 19th century, a cartoonist dared to show that smallpox is actually not such a good thing, that it is such a horrific disease and not necessarily worse than Covid. It just looks bad. So he took the liberty of using a marketing gimmick for the doctors who ride on oxen and donkeys and, as an incentive to vaccinate, drive a nymph covered in smallpox to scare people. And you can see what the children on the right are doing. The children are fleeing. You need this fear scenario, like the corpses that would be lying on every street corner if there was Covid. So this pox-covered nymph was shown here. And fear has always been a central point of the business. But that was not justified in the case of smallpox. Why? Smallpox is known to have been present in the West for at least a thousand years, probably for many thousands of years. But as a harp that has not been discussed. And here I have brought some statistics from England and you can see that it only starts around 1630. That is when the first adult case that probably corresponded to smallpox was documented. Up until then there were only questionable oddities of an adult getting smallpox. That only started in the second half of the 17th century. And above all the smallpox disaster was in the 18th century, when there were already vaccinations. Because before that, if you look again, in London there were less than 100 deaths a year from smallpox, where many people lived in very poor social conditions. And it was not until the 18th century that there were hundreds of thousands of fatal cases of smallpox. And let's just think about Covid, people didn't die in 2020, but only after vaccinations had begun. And here perhaps as a first clue, could this have something to do with other social developments? Yes, smallpox only became a disaster for Europe when the Counter-Reformation took hold after the Thirty Years' War. It is still written in many books and is diligently copied again and again what the inoculations with pus cause. And that the inoculation of smallpox patients is an old folk medicine tradition. The Chinese, the Indians, the Africans had already done it. And that is why it is said that vaccination is the most natural thing in the world. If you look at the facts, that is not true at all. There are no documents before 1700 that show that anyone had carved pus into another person. Inoculations were first documented around 1700 by two Greek fortune tellers in Constantinople; Shortly afterwards, smallpox epidemics occurred there too. And in 1713, a Greek doctor first reported such inoculations. But this was not an old folk medicine tradition. And it is also an old wives' tale of smallpox history to say that this woman, Lady Wortley Montagu, was the great introducer of the beneficial smallpox vaccination. She saw it in Constantinople, then acted as a vaccination lobbyist in Western Europe from 1721 onwards and spread it mainly among the upper classes. But even then, healthy people died from these inoculations, and especially in the leading social circles. Even among vaccination advocates, a death rate of at least two percent is attested. How high it really was is not known. But you can actually erase Mrs Wortley Montagu from history, she did not really play a role. Because ten years after her activity as a vaccination lobbyist, in Englandprobably no more than a thousand people had been inoculated. More important was a certain Abbe Conti, about whom you learn hardly anything in history. A Jesuit who campaigned strongly for these vaccinations. And why? Because there was a lot of money involved. Here's an example: an English doctor was called to the Russian Tsarina Catherine the Great to inoculate her and her children. And for this work of, let's say, five minutes, he was paid 10,000 pounds, the equivalent of about a million euros today, a lifelong pension of 500 pounds a year, and the title of baron. He and his descendants were set for life. The vaccination Porsches in garages today are comparatively few in number. In 1721 these obscure inoculations of smallpox pus were already lapping across the pond. Supposedly, cases of smallpox were introduced into the USA by a ship. And a clergyman and a doctor then insisted that the population absolutely had to be protected with inoculations. And this evaluation that they made at the time is also considered to be the first medical statistics. The death rate from smallpox would have been reduced from 15 percent to 2.5 percent. A success. But what people forget is that this was not a proper study that Mr. Cotton Mather, a fanatical Puritan, did. The groups were not comparable at all. There was no randomized distribution. Those who were vaccinated and those who were not were obviously very different groups. And the success must have been limited because during this vaccination campaign Mr. Cotton Mather had to let his wife deny him in his own house for 14 days because otherwise they would probably have lynched him. So there must have been serious health incidents and deaths. Mr. Cotton Mather also carried out witch trials over there, by the way. Yes, and the successes in Europe were not looking good either. If you look here, these are statistics from Copenhagen, annual smallpox mortality. And here is a mark showing where the inoculation hospital was opened and closed again. You can't see anything in the figures that anything has changed. So much for success. And if they didn't happen in Copenhagen and elsewhere, they probably couldn't have happened in Boston either. What isn't mentioned in many books on the history of medicine is that in 1729, eight years after Lady Wortley Montagu had propagated the whole thing, the British Parliament had already banned inoculations. And it wasn't until 1743 that the very wise statement was made that nobles and the wealthy mostly die of smallpox. The untreated people survive without treatment. Which also shows that smallpox wasn't really a serious disease. It was only in this form that it was practiced again. And Maria Theresa's personal physician in Vienna considered inoculation vaccination to be a serious disease. And that influenced history. Not smallpox, but vaccination. I'll show you two prominent tips here. The deaths, on the left Louis XV, on the right the last Bavarian Wittelsbach. His line was wiped out by the alleged death of Maximilian III Joseph from smallpox. Both died - one at 64, the other at 50 - allegedly from smallpox. And both had one thing in common: they were much-loved rulers. The people were doing well under their rule. We know for sure that Louis XV could not have caught smallpox at 64 because he had it as a child and smallpox creates lifelong immunity. Louis XV looked at himself at 64 and said, if I didn't know that I had had smallpox as a child, I would say I had smallpox. He didn't survive. It can only have been vaccinations. Max III Joseph is accused of only forcing his population to be inoculated, but always refusing to do so himself. One may doubt that someone who was in perfect health would die of smallpox at the age of 50. And there are many others. Two Habsburg emperors in Vienna also died of smallpox. And there are a few things that should give us food for thought. The nobles who died. They were people who were very wealthy. But smallpox was actually a disease of the slums, of the poor. How can that be? And it was always a childhood disease. How can people in advanced age get smallpox when they were in perfect health? Hardly any doctor at that time had seen smallpox in adults. And what is even more important is that everyone knows that smallpox is extremely contagious. But where the rulers and the other nobles died, there were no other sick people and no other deaths from smallpox. They were not contagious and they obviouslynot necessarily infected other people. But there is something else in common. All rulers had the church as their enemy. They wanted to take away the church's tax exemption, which did not happen after its death. And I have another witness to these events. He is a monk, Abraham a Santa Clara, who lived at that time. His real name was Johann Ulrich Megerle. And he said back then that the privilege of the medicorum gentlemen is to kill without punishment. So James Bond was not the first in human history to be given the license to kill, but it was actually introduced with the founding of the medical profession in the 13th century, as Mr Megerle says. If you think that this is all exaggerated, because inoculation can't be that bad, I have a sentence here that is in the history of vaccinations by Hervé Bovin, a professor emeritus in Leuven, and an ardent supporter of vaccination, also associated with the Pasteur Institute. And he writes in his 2011 book that inoculation, as practiced in Europe between 1721 and the introduction of the Sutton method, which we will talk about in a moment, was very dangerous. It was undoubtedly at the limit, at the limit of what could be tolerated. So, with that, he is also indirectly saying quite clearly that these inoculations were also a potential murder weapon. And none of that would have had to be the case if one had listened to this gentleman. Daniel Sutton, not an academic doctor, but a skilled surgeon, came from a family of surgeons. From 1750 onwards he carried out inoculations, but with a new technique. And by the way, he also made a lot of money from it. An inoculation cost him 10 pounds for ordinary people, 25 pounds for the wealthy. He made between 500 and 1000 a day. Back then, a single-family home cost 500 pounds. That means he earned several single-family homes in one day that way. But nonetheless, he did himself justice because he said at the end of his life, I didn't lose a single patient. First of all, he refrained from further toxic measures. This is often forgotten in the history of vaccinations, just as the adjuvants in vaccines are often omitted. Because back then, when you were vaccinated in official medicine, you also got a bloodletting, antimony, mercury and other tasty, toxic things. He didn't do any of that. He only did this inoculation and said nothing else except fresh air. But above all he did one thing. And if people had listened to Mr Sutton, the Covid vaccination disaster would not have happened either. He carried out a basic experiment. He once just scratched the pus into the skin without drawing any blood. He prepared the skin once, injected the pus into the subcutaneous fat, and then injected the pus into the muscles and saw what happened. And he found that the target event was vaccination pustules on the skin, a harmless smallpox disease that would appear after this inoculation. This only occurred when he inoculated the skin, not the subcutaneous fat and not the muscles, but the skin. Why? It's actually quite clear. Our immune system works intracutaneously. Anything we inject deeper is a disaster. And unfortunately medicine has not realized this since Mr Sutton's time, 250 years ago. Unfortunately, his work "The Inoculator" was not published until 1796. When Jenner's vaccination was already in the starting blocks. But what Sutton taught us is that our immune system, if you want to teach this with vaccinations, only works through the skin and mucous membranes. That is how it is set up by evolution. But not if you inject something deeper into the tissue. Only the skin, nasopharynx, lungs and digestive tract can have an effect on the memory of the immune system. Everything else is a physical injury with the potential to cause damage. That would have been Sutton's breakthrough. But then came Mr Jenner. And Mr Jenner was of the opinion, not the first, but other doctors before him, that the harmless cowpox, which meant that the milkmaids did not have smallpox scars but kept their beautiful white skin, could serve as a good substitute for human smallpox pus if they were vaccinated with it. But the milkmaids actually only stayed healthy and had beautiful skin because they had fresh, unpasteurized cow's milk. It had nothing to do with the cowpox. Why? Because it was extremely rare. Jenner himself never had any evidence of the effectiveness of his vaccination. And he carried out unethical experiments. For example, he infected his gardener's son withthis cowpox vaccination and exposed the child to smallpox to see if anything would happen. And he did not hesitate to vaccinate his son. You don't usually read that either. His son was mentally handicapped after this vaccination and died at the age of 21. That is the vaccination hero Jenner. And a few years ago old tubes that Mr Jenner had sent out back then were examined. There was no cowpox in them. There was horsepox in them. Or maybe just something dried up. Something that was sent around the world that certainly couldn't have done any good. And the few statistics that exist for England after Jenner's introduction show you here, on the left-hand side, the number of smallpox deaths in England. We had already had compulsory vaccinations since 1853. 14,000, 20,000 and then an epidemic with 44,000 smallpox deaths. People gradually began to realise that vaccination actually leads to death from smallpox. And there was a city that did the experiment, so to speak. You can see it here. That is the city of Leicester. I'll go back again. The city of Leicester, which simply said through the city council that compulsory vaccination would no longer be enforced within the city limits. Compulsory vaccination is no longer enforced. And the city of Leicester has the fewest number of smallpox cases and the fewest number of smallpox deaths compared to the other cities where compulsory vaccination was enforced. And that was also shown by the further course of events at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th century. Here you can see the number of cases of smallpox deaths and those who died as a result of the smallpox vaccination. The curves show essentially the same values. This means that even ardent supporters of vaccination cannot talk about a reduction in mortality. But there were not only deaths, there were also serious disabilities. Meningitis occurred with modifications to the smallpox vaccination. And in 1924, for the first time, a pathologist in Prague made a clear connection during an autopsy. You can see how long that takes. So 125 years after the introduction of vaccination, it was first determined that this had led to meningitis. Although, of course, this had happened earlier. And then it took another human lifetime, namely a generation, 30 years, for vaccination damage to be recognized in Karlsruhe in 1953. Until then, there had officially been no vaccination damage, although vaccination had already been in place for 250 years. In the Federal Republic of Germany, although there were no more cases of smallpox, there were seven confirmed cases of smallpox from 1949 to 1950, 360 vaccine deaths recognized by the RKI or Paul Ehrlich Institute from 1949 to 1979, and at least 984 permanent injuries. And that is why smallpox had to be declared eradicated in 1979, because that was the only way to remove the smallpox vaccination from the scene. Otherwise, smallpox vaccination would have had to be continued. But that was not possible. And I would like to conclude with a quote from an American doctor, a vaccination advocate who was medical director of preventive medicine in the U.S. Army. In 1940, after almost 250 years of vaccination history, he said that the whole question of immunization, both active and passive, is still in the experimental stage. And we have now experienced again what an experimental stage the whole thing is in. And if that is the case after all this time, then all you can really say is: why can vaccinations even still be an issue?

from ts/ch

Sources/Links: Dr. Gerd Reuther: Impfungen, eine Erfolgsgeschichte? https://rumble.com/v4xq4wo-dr.-gerd-reuther-zur-geschichte-der-impfungen.html
Ticket: SE- https://www.mwgfd.org/2024/05/rueckblick-pressesymposium-impfstoffzulassung-impfempfehlung-impfpflicht-reichen-die-daten/