Comic: Access to our children by WHO and UN

29.05.2024 | www.kla.tv/29205

Once upon a time, biology lessons were limited to anatomical differences and how babies are made. What you have to do if you are not ready for these and how you can protect yourself from unwanted diseases. Not quite up to date anymore? The WHO, the World Health Organization, thought the same and presented standards that, in collaboration with the Federal Center for Health Education in Germany, developed into an educational plan. However, the WHO standards are to be implemented across all subjects throughout Europe. In the German-speaking region alone, this affects over 15.6 million children who will be trained in the use of dildos, love balls, leather whips or handcuffs in the future. Where does which object go? How do I set up a brothel that suits all people of all sexual preferences? These are the tricky tasks that the children are given. The boring, often soporific nature films in class are to be replaced by watching porn and pornographic images in order to teach responsible use of these. This applies to students aged 12 and over. “What Johnny doesn’t learn, Hans will never learn.” That is why the WHO is proposing early sexual education in kindergarten and primary school. Mutual touching and doctor games are intended to teach children the external differences. Everything about early childhood masturbation and the desire to discover one’s own body and genitals and other questionable content can be read in the WHO standards. Who is behind the implementation of these “innovative” ideas? As far as Germany is concerned, the five authors of the practical book “Sexual Education of Diversity”, which is to be used for teaching, belong to the German Society for Sexual Education and the affiliated institute, which awards the quality seal for sexual education according to its own definitions. The co-founder and mentor is Uwe Sielert, professor of education in Kiel. Sielert is the mediator of gender sexual education with which he wants to denaturalize three life circumstances: the nuclear family, heterosexuality and generativity. The gender mainstream program can be read in the information service of the Federal Center for Health Education. The gender ideology behind diversity sex education is controversial, but not new, even if it is only now making its way into our schools. It had its breakthrough in 1995 in Beijing. In her book "The Gender Agenda", participant Dale O'Leary summarizes five theses that are supported by the majority in the UN establishment. Point three on the list is: "The world needs sex education for children and young people that encourages sexual experimentation. Parental rights need to be abolished." Good things take time. And here we are. Anyone who does not approve of this type of education for their child will soon find themselves in a dilemma. Missing class is a criminal offense, which also gives parents the opportunity to get to know the handcuffs that their children use in class. Even if it seems absurd, it is reality!

from ts

Sources/Links: Zugriff auf unsere Kinder durch die WHO und UN https://rumble.com/v3n4xma-zugriff-auf-unsere-kinder-durch-die-who-und-un.html
UN zu Sex mit Minderjährigen (siehe Principle 16) https://share-netinternational.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/8-MARCH-Principles-FINAL-printer-version-1-MARCH-2023.pdf
Standards für die Sexualaufklärung in Europa (BZgA) https://www.bzga-whocc.de/fileadmin/user_upload/BZgA_Standards_German.pdf