In Commemoration of Clemens Arvay – Jews Against Media Incitement „Anti-Semitism Cudgel”

27.06.2023 | www.kla.tv/26401

Once again, Jewish associations are raising their voices to shed light on the misuse of the term “anti-Semitism.” Their message: “The anti-semitism cudgel is used as a weapon against critics of government measures. Like any weapon, it causes destruction. Like any weapon, it is a means of oppression and violence. This we do not want! […] Because the impression is created that it is we, the Jews, who hold the anti-semitism cudgel in our hands. That it is we who want to be protected from the “swearers,” “conspiracy theorists,” “Nazis,” and “right-wing radicals.” Listen to the entire open letter from the three Jewish Federations, Jews for Justice, Jews for Enlightenment, and We for Humanity. The open letter was published in English on the blog of U.S. author and journalist Margaret Anna Alice. Open letter in memory of Clemens Arvay: One of many – one too many. Jews against media agitation. This letter was written by Jews who united internationally. It is addressed to politicians and the media, but also and above all to our fellow men who stand and watch without taking action or, in anticipatory obedience, make themselves complicit. We mourn the death of Clemens Arvay. What drove this gentle man to end his life at the age of forty-two? What drove a loving father to leave his son behind? Always matter-of-fact and intent on conflict-free debate, attached to nature and music … how desperate must Clemens Arvay have been to give up everything he loved because he could see no way out? There is hardly a worse insult for a decent person than to be called an “anti-semite.” When the advocates of the ruling opinion – or rather the opinion of the rulers – wield the anti-semitism cudgel for no reason, they condone the pain and despair they cause. Clemens Arvay was also subjected to such agitation and denigrated as an anti-semite. We are no longer able to ask him the final trigger for his decision. But one question the agitators – the media in question, including some leading outlets and individual profiteers of political favor – may and must be asked is, Are you touched by the idea that this death might have something to do with your agitation? It is not relevant what the ultimate trigger was, but you must confront the possibility that you might be responsible for Clemens’s final, irreversible decision. This death breaks the dam. The pent-up horror at the way you treat what is sacred to us, what has shaped us, what gives rise to our pain and our knowledge, moves us to write this letter. An anti-semite is a Jew-hater. Those who tried to exterminate the European Jews eighty years ago were anti-semites. Nazis are eugenicists, mass murderers who, out of their alleged racial superiority, denigrate, mistreat, and kill people. To use these terms against people who merely question the vaccination agenda that has become religion, speak out in favor of peace negotiations, or otherwise buck a political or media trend is an unacceptable trivialization of Nazism and of the Holocaust. Such inflationary comparison of dissenters to mass murderers is a mockery of the victims of National Socialism. Some of these victims are the ancestors of the signatories of this letter, our parents and grandparents. And the signers know firsthand what distinguishes a dissenting biologist with such impressive human integrity from an anti-semite. The anti-semitism cudgel is used as a weapon against critics of government measures. Like any weapon, it causes destruction. Like any weapon, it is a means of oppression and violence. This we do not want! Why do we see ourselves in the position of saying, “Enough is enough!”? Because the impression is created that it is we, the Jews, who hold the anti-semitism cudgel in our hands. That it is we who want to be protected from the “swearers,” “conspiracy theorists,” “Nazis,” and “right-wing radicals.” That we were the ones who supposedly wanted to be protected from Clemens Arvay. We are also said to have asked for protection from Vera Sharav, Andrew Bridgen, Daniele Ganser, Sucharit Bhakdi, Neil Oliver, Roger Waters, Andrew Tate, David Icke, and Ken Jebsen, among others. We are said to have been the ones who demanded fashionable trials for incitement of the people and Holocaust trivialization in Germany or Wiederbetätigung in Austria. Clemens Arvay was not an anti-semite. We did not charge anyone with hurting him on our behalf. Dr. Daniele Ganser is not an anti-semite. We do not wish to be abused for silencing this historian because his opinion about the war contradicts the approved narrative. Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi is not an anti-semite. Those who are offended by the scholar whose passionate enlightenment has saved countless lives are far from representing all Jews. Neil Oliver is not an anti-semite, nor should he be defamed on our behalf. Andrew Bridgen is not an anti-semite, and the fellow politician who slandered him as such has now been exposed for the corrupt and manipulative official he is. The fact that Vera Sharav, a Holocaust survivor and lifelong advocate of medical ethics, is being prosecuted in Germany for Holocaust denial and incitement of the people shows all the more clearly what we are up against. This is not being done on our behalf. The same applies to every aforementioned personality and countless other critically thinking people who are denied, insulted, marginalized, and robbed of their good name and existence within the framework of the uniform Corona agenda according to a uniform principle – as if according to a playbook. Every court case under the said paragraphs and every groundless insult of “Nazi,” “anti-semite,” or “Holocaust denier” aims at destroying a reputation, a financial and social existence – or even a life. We can never support such measures in a society that defines itself as liberal-democratic. Moreover, we live in fear and worry: By destroying lives in our name, by dividing society, by inciting against a critical minority, one justifies and promotes real anti-semitism. And not only that: The constantly cultivated fear of being called a Nazi or anti-semite deprives people of civil courage and degrades our society into one that idly stands by and watches injustice. In his book Instructions for Unhappiness, Paul Watzlawick writes: “What A says about B says a lot about A and little about B.” This says everything about the G’d-less campaign against Clemens Arvay. To those who share our pain and concern: Take action! To the inciters and their contractors: Will you at least have the mercy to allow Clemens’s son to be proud of his father? Will you right these wrongs? Will you in the future see the human beings behind the critics? The fathers, mothers, lovers, sons, daughters, and people like you who simply do not share your opinion? Signed, Jews for Justice • Jews for Enlightenment • We for Humanity (Email if you would like to connect with the groups or request more details.)

from sap./wie.

Sources/Links: Case Arvay: International Association of Jews condemn Media Agitation (16.3.23) https://tkp.at/2023/03/16/fall-arvay-internationales-buendnis-von-juden-klagt-medienhetze-an/
„It was an execution. He was completely desperate“ Suicide of Clemens Arvay – the story of a human hunt (19.3.23) https://reitschuster.de/post/es-war-eine-hinrichtung-er-war-vollkommen-verzweifelt/
Requiem for a Smear Victim: Clemens Arvay (15.3.23) https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/requiem-for-a-smear-victim-clemens
ORF.at Biologist and author Clemens Arvay is dead (24.2.23) https://orf.at/stories/3306496/
Jews for Justice – Jews for Enlightenment – We for Humanity we.are@united-jews-for-freedom-and-peace.org