Anita Petek-Dimmer: Vaccinations - Sense or Nonsense

24.10.2024 | www.kla.tv/30841

Ivo Zasek: Allow me to introduce you to Anita Petek. She is accused of not having the title of candidate or doctor of sciences. But I want to say for myself that self-taught people are the best in the whole world. There is even an opinion that the best comes from self-taught people. Anita Petek is self-taught, so what she says is identical to many voices of people who have all these titles: professors, doctors of science, etc. She is a really high-class specialist. She studied and analyzed 30,000 pages of literature on vaccination, that is, she not only read them, but also analyzed them. She concluded that vaccinations have caused more suffering and death in more than 100 years than anything else in the history of medicine. Therefore, if this is indeed the case, then we have the right to hear something about it.. If I am not mistaken, Anita Petek will review not 100, but 200 years back into the history of vaccinations and conclude with the title "Vaccinations: Sense or Nonsense ?". Please! Anita Petek: Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen! I would like to thank you from the beginning for your events and the opportunity to talk about it here today. Some of you know me and know that I speak very fast, and that is exactly what I will be doing today. For 15 years I have been giving talks on the topic: vaccine. From the very beginning I was attacked because I am not a doctor. Because of this, I developed an inferiority complex. But then, after several years, I realized that I should be grateful that I am not a doctor. This fact was confirmed to me by other doctors. I can be free from superstitions and be satisfied with the path I have taken. First of all, I would like to start with history in order to understand how people used to think about such questions and how the path from the beginning to this time looked like. And why do we have this vaccination lobby today and each of us suffers from it to a greater or lesser extent. Edward Yenner is an English doctor. He began in 1796 to vaccinate against smallpox. This is the official start of vaccinations against smallpox, although there were various attempts before that. Next was Louis Pasteur, a Frenchman. He, like me, was not a doctor either. He was a chemist by trade, and the whole vaccination industry and the whole theory of infection, which is still called a theory, is based on him. Because of that, I feel good also because this person, like me, was not a doctor either. His first vaccination was in 1885. against rabies. After this vaccination there were others with which he experimented. And it was with the vaccination against rabies that he entered this field. Then there was the German Robert Koch. He was a doctor and developed a vaccine against tuberculosis in 1928. I think most of you have had the smallpox shot, the rabies shot is not that common. And most of you older people, unfortunately, have to have the tuberculosis vaccination. Based on Pasteur and Jenner, I would like to show how and why the vaccination industry developed to the extent it is today. That is, on what basis is our faith in vaccination based today. In 1798, Edward Yenner wrote a report on 23 cases of smallpox. This is a prelude to vaccination against smallpox. 14 men out of these 23 were completely unvaccinated, that is, they got sick with smallpox, recovered themselves and were included in this message as an example of the success of vaccination against smallpox. John Baker, a 5-year-old boy, died a few days after the vaccination, and this case was not even mentioned by Edward Yenner in his report, which was written several years later. Only four cases out of 23 can be considered real evidence. Only 4 cases out of 23! And on the basis of these four cases, vaccination against smallpox was adopted, and on the basis of these four cases, for more than a hundred years, compulsory vaccination was given to everyone in Europe. And moreover, these 4 cases were written only a few weeks after vaccination. That is, they did not take into account the long-term effects and did not follow up to say for sure whether they are now protected from smallpox or not. That is, there was no proof of the strength and duration of protection. However, on the basis of these 4 cases, millions of people were vaccinated against smallpox, and that was forced, because in Germany, for example, compulsory vaccination was abolished only in 1978. In Switzerland, mandatory vaccinations were not introduced at all. And at the same time, Switzerland is one of the few countries where there was no smallpox epidemic at all. And do you know why? Because we never had a smallpox vaccination. This is the only and true reason. There is a small book by Yenner where you can still read about it in the original today. Our science and today's medicine with the entire vaccination industry build their faith in smallpox vaccination on the shaky foundation of 4 cases. And they have been vaccinating more or less all of humanity for over 200 years on this, never really proven basis. And to this day, no one has officially checked it, and it just continues to be done. And now let's move on to Pasteur from France. Louis Pasteur experimented with the saliva of rabid dogs. I mixed it with the broth and expected something to happen, but nothing did. Why didn't it happen? Today we know that there are no rabies pathogens in the saliva of a rabid animal. Passter could find no changes in the broth and decided that because of this the rabies agent must be incredibly small and therefore called it a virus. Virus means poison. And thus this term entered modern medicine, and today viruses are pathogens, or rather "so-called" pathogens. That is, even then Pasteur introduced this concept into widespread use, and now we think that we know what we are talking about. World fame came to Pasteur when 9-year-old Joseph Meister was brought to him on July 6, 1885. This boy had been bitten by a rabid dog in 14 different places 48 hours earlier. Before that, Pasteur never vaccinated people, only poor sheep, who died en masse from it, but no one talked about it. And after two and a half hours of internal struggle, he decided to vaccinate this boy. Because he thought, "Either I vaccinate him, or he dies." Because then they thought, as they do today, by the way, that rabid dogs die from the bite, which, in general, is not true. After three weeks of daily rabies shots in the stomach, which must have been very painful for the little boy, Pasteur wrote, the boy "remained healthy." And Pasteur became famous because of this single case. And after that, the whole world, even Russia and its tsar, wanted to have Pasteur's vaccine. Only because of this one incident. And now I want to show you why this single case is not proof that the vaccine works. Pasteur then used the so-called active vaccine. In general, active and passive vaccines are distinguished. Today's vaccines are active. Because they say that the body should produce antibodies on its own. And today they teach: if in the case of rabies, only active vaccine is given, and not active and passive at the same time, then it will be useless and the person will die. And then Pasteur gave the boy only active vaccine. The dog bite was 48 hours before. And today they teach that vaccination against rabies must be done in the first 24 hours after the bite, otherwise the person will die. Joseph Meister was given shots in the stomach, but today they teach that this is absolutely the wrong place for the vaccine, and now they give the rabies shot directly into the wound. In addition, it turned out that the two men who wanted to tear the dog away from that child were also bitten by the dog. But they did not go to Paris, to Pasteur, did not get vaccinated and remained healthy. They didn't talk about it at all. This means: either this dog was not rabid, or this boy was not infected with rabies. By the way, Pasteur was a chemist, not a doctor. So please answer me how can a chemist diagnose rabies? Today, even a doctor cannot diagnose rabies if he does not have a laboratory report, much less he could not then. I want to talk about the production of vaccines, because if we know how vaccines are produced, then we know that, firstly, vaccinations can only bring harm, and secondly, vaccinations will never give us what is promised from them, that is, protection. Today, vaccines are produced on the basis of animal products. For example, the flu vaccine is based on chicken eggs or animal blood. There are vaccines that are made from dead human embryos, and today's vaccine industry is excited about this material because the basic material can be obtained so cheaply. I will not comment on this statement, because each of you understands what is being said here. Because here we are not talking about health, but about ethics and morality. And they are at least as important as health, or even more important. Because our life begins and ends with ethics and morality, and health comes later. Vaccines against rubella and chicken pox are produced on the basis of dead embryos. The whole world uses this vaccine, except for Japan, which refuses to do so for ethical reasons. They make this vaccine on the basis of dog organs, although if I respect and honor life, then from the point of view of ethics it is the same: I take an animal or a person. Then there are vaccines that are made on the basis of so-called "HeLa cells". This name comes from the name of a woman, Henrietta Lacks. This woman died in the mid-80s. She had cancer that progressed incredibly fast. And imagine, one of the doctors who watched the rapid development of cancer thought to himself: "That's great, these cells can be used to produce vaccines." And this is the reason why many vaccines are made on this basis today, because in this way they can be produced very quickly and very cheaply. You see, it's not about health, it's about profit. And today, the medical industry is the second most important factor in any country, especially in Switzerland, after the military industry. Measles and mumps vaccines have been grown on human cells. In developed countries, there is no other basis for vaccines against these diseases than human cells. And partially, vaccines against rabies are also made of the same material. Our pharmaceutical industry says that there is nothing wrong with this, because these vaccines are purified in such a way that later, during vaccination, there is nothing left of these cancer cells. But this is not true, because if the ampoule with the vaccine is taken to the laboratoryatory, then we will see that these cancer cells are still in the vaccine. This is a known fact. If these cancer cells are there, then they are also capable of causing harm, and there is no need to argue about that. There are also vaccines that are made from cell lines, and these are mainly cancer cells from animals, mostly monkeys. They thought that since they look like people, it is possible to use their cells for people. Flu vaccines are partially made from this substance, because a large part is still from chicken eggs. For example, Baxter's vaccines are made from these monkey cancer cells. There are also genetically modified vaccines, which the pharmaceutical industry says are the best of the best. In general, we can assume that all new vaccines will only be genetically modified. The new cervical cancer vaccine is already genetically modified. Our pharmaceutical industry is convinced that through genetic modification it is able to better manage the production of vaccines. It seems that the vaccine is then "cleaner", but in general, it is the case that due to genetic modification, the pharmaceutical industry itself does not know what it is doing. Neither we know what is being injected into us, nor does the pharmaceutical industry itself. But the damage that is done to us will not be visible immediately after having been vaccinated. This damage is passed on to the next generation and the next, and this damage will only be seen when there is no turning back for us. Then we can call it a biological disaster. For example, hepatitis B vaccine, it is only genetically modified. Then the cervical cancer vaccine, some rabies vaccines and 99% of all animal vaccines are genetically modified. And in general, vaccines for animals contain so dangerous substances that were banned in human vaccines a long time ago. This is because animals cannot speak and cannot resist. There are 80 to 100 ingredients in each vaccine, and you won't read anything about the ingredients anywhere. That's why I decided to write a book about it 2-3 years ago. Sometimes here and there, in passing, you can hear about mercury as an ingredient in vaccines, but in general it is not mentioned anywhere. And when I took up this topic, I was really depressed for several months. Because when you see how much everything is mixed there ... and it's half-trouble if it's given to adults. But if these substances are injected into babies who are only a couple of weeks old, who cannot yet resist, whose body cannot resist it, then these are very serious things and you have to deal with it somehow. As already mentioned, the vaccine has 80 to 100 ingredients that are not listed in the instructions because, according to the law, almost everywhere in all countries, they are not subject to declaration. They indicate only a small part of these substances, but the manufacturer is not obliged to indicate most of them. At worst, I will tell you one example now. A couple of years ago, the Merck company produced a vaccine against hepatitis B. In the instructions it was written: recombinant hepatitis B viruses. Do you know what recombinant viruses are? Recombinant means produced by genetic engineering. They wrote that way because they knew that people would not like the word "genetic engineering". That's why they wrote recombinant so that the people would fall into this trap. In addition to recombinant viruses, according to the instructions, there was a solution of common salt in the ampoule. That is, a salt solution in which a couple of viruses float. And I could not believe it so easily. Then I called the Paul Ehrlich Institute (this is the authority that deals with the control of vaccines in Germany) and asked to explain what is contained in this new vaccine. I was told that I should look in the manual. And I said that the instructions are right in front of me, but it only says about salt solution and recombinant viruses. Then the interlocutor laughed and said: "Ms. Petek, if you knew how much there is! But I will not get my documents now and you should limit yourself to what is written in the instructions.'' Then I said: "Shut up, but you allowed this vaccine on the market and I thought that Merck should provide you with all the necessary documents for this, the results of studies, etc." To which he answered me: "No, we don't know for sure, because it officially falls under the article "Commercial secret". That is, the manufacturer is not obliged to inform the control service about what is contained in the vaccines." And then I asked: "And how can you allow something to be consumed that you do not know what is contained there and what harm it can cause?". He replied, "Well, you have to trust the manufacturer." I hung up and thought: “This is Germany. In Switzerland, everything is probably different, here everything is valid, orderly and as it should be." I call the control service of Switzerland and the interlocutor on the phone gives me the same answer: commercial secret. That is, the manufacturer is not obliged to declare these things. And if he is not obliged, then he will not reveal his commercial secret. Then I decided to call Austria as well, with the hope that there might be more order there than in other German-speaking countries. But you have already guessed that the situation in Austria is the same as in Germany and Switzerland. I thought: how that this is the situation in our developed countries, how much worse it must be in less developed countries. Even in supposedly civilized countries like ours, there is a trade secret that protects the manufacturer and leaves the patient defenseless. And this is officially by law. In the instructions, by law, those substances that are added later must be declared. And here, of course, the manufacturer is careful not to draw too much attention to himself. 98% of all ingredients are pure nerve poisons, and we must always bear this in mind that we are not only talking about adults being vaccinated, but also newborn babies. These ingredients are produced by the chemical industry and supplied to the pharmaceutical industry. The pharmaceutical industry itself manufactures antibiotics and one or two other substances, and everything else is manufactured by the chemical industry. The pharmaceutical industry brings it to market. And, just imagine, the first five years of a vaccine on the market are considered clinical trials. For example, the cervical cancer vaccine is currently being tested on you and me. And only a small number of vaccines go through clinical trials before being approved for the market. By the way, did you know that now men are vaccinated against cervical cancer? This is especially true of Austria, although I considered Austrians to be intelligent people. But now they are trying to vaccinate boys against cervical cancer. By the way, this is also the case in America. Both mothers and their sons are tried to be convinced with the following argument: "It is clear that boys cannot get cervical cancer themselves, but they can supposedly get infected through sexual relations with girls and get penile cancer." Can you imagine? The most important thing is to sow panic. This debate was recently in Austria, but I hope it is already on the decline. So, vaccines contain antigens, these are bacteria and viruses. Also preservatives, and this is very important. Only three preservatives are approved for human use. These are thiomersal, sodium thimerphonate and 2-phenoxyethanol. Thiomersal is 48.9%, and sodium thimerphonate is 43.7% pure mercury. Officially, since 2000, vaccines for children must not contain mercury. But the moment is what I told you earlier: only those substances that are added to the vaccine later are subject to declaration. Those substances that are added in the vaccine production process are not declared, and mercury is still used there. And even if the vaccine is cleaned and filtered as much as you want, mercury will still be there and it will cause harm. Mercury causes disturbances in concentration and the learning process in our children. And it also has the effect that children become hyperactive. That is, such restless ones as we have now in our schools, and their number can reach a third of the class. And some of them even need treatment. Now let's look at the business of the pharmaceutical industry. For example, the Novartis company. First they make people sick through vaccinations and then they make Ritalin. And since Ritalin has very strong negative side effects, Novartis has now launched a drug on the market that mitigates the side effects of Ritalin. Thus, with only three of these drugs, that is, a vaccine and two drugs to remove side effects, they provide themselves with millions of profits. 2-phenoxyethanol has been known for about 20 years as a drug that destroys nerves and kidneys. If the public still knows a little about mercury, it knows almost nothing about 2-phenoxyethanol. Maybe partly because the name is very difficult to pronounce. Vaccines also contain excipients. The pharmaceutical industry says they are very important. I'll show you why. These are, for example, phosphates, carbonates, solvents, stabilizers. This is polysorbate 80, hydrolyzed gelatins. Although gelatin sounds delicious, in order not to spoil your appetite, I will not tell you how it is made. These gelatins are responsible for frequent cases of allergies in our children. Human albumin is also added. The reason for this is that after vaccination, especially in children, anaphylactic shock can occur. And the pharmaceutical industry knows about it. And because the vaccine contains a foreign protein that enters the body in an unnatural way, many people react to it with anaphylactic shock. But to avoid this, human albumin is added to the vaccine to at least initially hide it. At first glance, it may seem that these substances are similar to those that we can read about on the back of the packaging of gelatin candies. Perhaps they are in their place in gelatin candies, so that the candies have a variety of beautiful colors and do not stick together. But I am absolutely sure that these substances should not be in the body of 2-month-old babies. If God wanted these substances to be in the bodies of children, then he would have sent them into the world with these substances. But if He did not, then there is every reason to doubt whether their place is really there. Aluminum sulfate is in almost every vaccine. And you may know that there are more vaccines for people 60-65 years of age and there are even more aluminum sulfates in there. This is because an elderly person does not produce antibodies as actively. But the problem is that we know that there is a lot of aluminum in the body of a person with Alzheimer's disease. It is because of this that it develops the tendency to increase in number. Every second child in German-speaking countries has an allergy, and the number continues to grow. What exactly does allergy mean? There are children who are allergic to almost everything. In the end, the question arises: what to feed them at all? In my opinion, additional substances in vaccines, nerve poisons are the substances that cause allergies. Weak immune system, colds. This is because the child's immune system is turned upside down. Health, which is given by nature, is taken away. Then it turns out that every breath of the wind ends in illness. Frequent inflammation of the tonsils and middle ear. A few years ago, Professor Heiniger, a pediatrician at a university clinic in Switzerland and a member of the vaccine commission, said in one of the public discussions that today it is normal if a 2-3-year-old child can have inflammation 8 to 10 times a year tonsils and middle ear. After these words, I started boiling, unable to sit any longer. This is not true! These are the things that are not talked about! And when there is nothing to say to the parents, they say that it is normal. The reason for the weakening of the immune system is due to vaccination, which is why children react in this way. Impairment of speech. More than 50% of first graders cannot speak correctly. We talked about such substances as mercury and aluminum. They settle in the area of ​​the brain responsible for language. And only after a few years you notice what damage was done here. Then behavioral disorders, for example, due to auxiliary substances ─ hyperactive children. Then a sharp cry. I want to tell a story here that I often hear from parents. Parents with month-old babies come home and they scream like crazy. It's not the scream when, for example, a full diaper, it's a loud piercing scream. The mother calls the doctor, asks: "Help me!" The doctor then says: "What, you can't calm the child down?" ─ and prescribes a candle. The candle, of course, does not help, the child continues to scream. I know a boy who is now 17 years old. Imagine, he screamed like this continuously for 48 hours. After that he fell into a deep, long sleep. And now he is 17 and has serious mental disorders. And if children fall asleep after such a cry, they have the first hypotonic, hyporesponsive episodes. If you approach the child's bed at this time, his body will be snow-white. And if you pick up the child at this moment, he will hang on you like a limp, listless doll. And after a few seconds, her body will turn blue-purple. These phases are always observed after this shrill cry. In the whooping cough vaccine, among the side effects is a sharp high-pitched scream for two hours. This is how we write it. In America, this vaccine says: sharp piercing scream for two hours followed by sudden death of the child. This sentence was taken away from us, fearing that it would worry parents. 8 weeks after the first vaccination, the second vaccination is scheduled to be given in Switzerland. And the scream begins, or the child is so weakened that he can no longer scream. And often, in addition to screaming, after the second vaccination, breathing difficulties or tightness in the chest appear. Moreover, often at night during sleep, lasting from a few seconds or even more. After the third vaccination, if the parents succumbed to the persuasion of the doctor or someone else, it can often happen that they find a dead child in the crib. This is called sudden infant death syndrome. In Switzerland and Austria, 60 to 80 children die of sudden infant death syndrome per year. In Germany now - from 600 to 1000 children per year. It has been known since the 1950s that 2/3 of children who died of sudden infant death syndrome were vaccinated with a whooping cough or diphtheria vaccine a few hours or at most a week before. And it is kept quiet, because if it is published, the profit will decrease. Seizures (all this can be read in the instructions for use, but unfortunately, the instructions themselves can be seen extremely rarely), temperature convulsions, especially after vaccination against chicken pox. Then paralysis of individual organs or the whole body, because these are nerve poisons that are there. Epilepsy. Diseases of the nerves and kidneys, because the kidneys have to excrete all these poisons, and so they are overworked because of it. Often in the instructions they write "temporary kidney diseases". I don't know what temporary illnesses mean. We are currently taking care of a child who has had kidney disease for three years, and the diagnosis is still "temporary disease". That is, it is, in fact, a stretched concept, and it can be stretched as much as you like. Then autoimmune diseases, for example, multiple sclerosis - a side effect in hepatitis B, cervical cancer and tick vaccines. In France, for example, there are no more school vaccinations against hepatitis B, because there were more than 600 cases of multiple sclerosis in students there in two years. And we, in Switzerland, Austria and Germany, have the same vaccine that was in France. In the vaccine against ticks, it is also written in the instructions that this vaccine can cause multiple sclerosis. Diabetes. There are many children who have diabetes in the first months, the number is increasing. Especially after the mumps vaccine. Encephalitis and meningitis, that is, inflammation of the brain and inflammation of the cerebral cortex, can occur after each vaccination, and is recorded as a possible side effect in almost every vaccine. Gradual paralysis that starts in the lower legs and can progress up to the lungs with possible death. It usually develops over a year, but after vaccination it can develop in 2-3 months. It can occur especially often after tick and flu vaccinations. Chronic fatigue and depression, especially after hepatitis A and B vaccinations. Restless behavior is a predictor of hyperactivity. And here you need to be very careful. Enuresis at an age when it shouldn't be. Sleep disturbance already on the first night after vaccination. Growth retardation lasting 2-3 years. Delay in development for several years, and even deaths are not uncommon after vaccinations. I will give some examples - these are the official statistics of Germany. Paul Ehrlich Institute received for 10 years, from 1987 to 1996. 13,141 reports of serious consequences after vaccinations. Serious consequences are: diabetes, encephalitis; rather than just redness and fever. Therefore, this institute recognized that this figure is only about 5% of actual cases. After all, they either don't talk about it, or somehow "sweep it under the carpet". That is, in a year in Germany we have 26,282 severe consequences after vaccinations or 262,820 cases in 10 years. According to data from the Robert Koch Institute, 40 million vaccinations are given annually in Germany. One in 1,522 vaccinated people has serious consequences after vaccination. Professor Hartmann, who was the head of the department of severe cases at the Paul Ehrlich Institute, published this work in May 1997, in June of the same year he was fired. The last point I would like to dwell on is research on effectiveness. In short, there is no control group for these studies. What is a control group? For example, a cervical cancer vaccine must be tested on two groups of people. One group should receive the vaccine and the other group should receive a placebo. A placebo is essentially a pacifier. In this case, for example, a solution of table salt. Then, according to the idea, the results of the two groups should be compared. Ideally, the participants should not know that some of them are getting table salt and some are getting the real vaccine. Also, the person who did the vaccination should not have known that one ampoule contains vaccine, and the other contains table salt. This should be the case for any study to analyze two groups and conclude that some are protected and others are not. And then I know for sure that yes, this vaccine definitely protects. But they don't do that. First, there is no control group. This control group exists only in fantasy. In fact, there has been no control group for vaccines for decades. In the case of the last cervical cancer vaccine, when one group was vaccinated against cervical cancer and the other against hepatitis A. That is, the other group is not given a pacifier, but a different vaccine. And then in the research results they write that after comparing both groups, they did not find any significant differences in side effects. But at the same time, I do not know that the other group received the vaccine and not a placebo. And then they say that this vaccine is harmless, but it is not. Effectiveness is measured only by the number of antibodies. That is, they do not vaccinate and then wait 10-20 years to see if there is protection. No, they want money even now. Today they are vaccinated, a week later antibodies start to be produced, and then they just take a blood test. They look, yes, he has a lot of antibodies, so he has protection. They still do this, although it is known that the level of antibodies does not say anything about protection. The presence of antibodies only means that my body was in contact with the pathogen. Pharmaceutical companies give orders for research, as a rule, to professors in various clinics. And the professors have to study these vaccines on volunteers. If the pharmaceutical companies also give money to these professors, then the research results are always skewed in favor of the pharmaceutical companies. Recently, there have been several scandals because serious publications refused to publish such studies due to the fact that they were heavily manipulated, because the publications did not want to take responsibility for publishing such false studies. Therefore, these publications created their ethics commissions. But since these commissions also include people paid by the pharmaceutical industry, this does not change the situation much. Pharmaceutical companies provide statistics specialists to help professors. These professionals work with the numbers they receive from the professor and process them in a way that puts them in a positive light. There was a professor who was doing research on the effects of mercury. He had to conduct as many as three studies before a medical journal could eventually publish his results. I saw with my own eyes the results of the first study, which was not published. And if you compare them with the results of the third study, they were completely opposite. After the first study, the result showed that mercury in vaccines causes autism in children. In the third version, after many meetingsinflammation of the cerebral cortex, can occur after each vaccination, and is recorded as a possible side effect in almost every vaccine. Gradual paralysis that starts in the lower legs and can progress up to the lungs with possible death. It usually develops over a year, but after vaccination it can develop in 2-3 months. It can occur especially often after tick and flu vaccinations. Chronic fatigue and depression, especially after hepatitis A and B vaccinations. Restless behavior is a predictor of hyperactivity. And here you need to be very careful. Enuresis at an age when it shouldn't be. Sleep disturbance already on the first night after vaccination. Growth retardation lasting 2-3 years. Delay in development for several years, and even deaths are not uncommon after vaccinations. I will give some examples - these are the official statistics of Germany. Paul Ehrlich Institute received for 10 years, from 1987 to 1996. 13,141 reports of serious consequences after vaccinations. Serious consequences are: diabetes, encephalitis; rather than just redness and fever. Therefore, this institute recognized that this figure is only about 5% of actual cases. After all, they either don't talk about it, or somehow "sweep it under the carpet". That is, in a year in Germany we have 26,282 severe consequences after vaccinations or 262,820 cases in 10 years. According to data from the Robert Koch Institute, 40 million vaccinations are given annually in Germany. One in 1,522 vaccinated people has serious consequences after vaccination. Professor Hartmann, who was the head of the department of severe cases at the Paul Ehrlich Institute, published this work in May 1997, in June of the same year he was fired. The last point I would like to dwell on is research on effectiveness. In short, there is no control group for these studies. What is a control group? For example, a cervical cancer vaccine must be tested on two groups of people. One group should receive the vaccine and the other group should receive a placebo. A placebo is essentially a pacifier. In this case, for example, a solution of table salt. Then, according to the idea, the results of the two groups should be compared. Ideally, the participants should not know that some of them are getting table salt and some are getting the real vaccine. Also, the person who did the vaccination should not have known that one ampoule contains vaccine, and the other contains table salt. This should be the case for any study to analyze two groups and conclude that some are protected and others are not. And then I know for sure that yes, this vaccine definitely protects. But they don't do that. First, there is no control group. This control group exists only in fantasy. In fact, there has been no control group for vaccines for decades. In the case of the last cervical cancer vaccine, when one group was vaccinated against cervical cancer and the other against hepatitis A. That is, the other group is not given a pacifier, but a different vaccine. And then in the research results they write that after comparing both groups, they did not find any significant differences in side effects. But at the same time, I do not know that the other group received the vaccine and not a placebo. And then they say that this vaccine is harmless, but it is not. Effectiveness is measured only by the number of antibodies. That is, they do not vaccinate and then wait 10-20 years to see if there is protection. No, they want money even now. Today they are vaccinated, a week later antibodies start to be produced, and then they just take a blood test. They look, yes, he has a lot of antibodies, so he has protection. They still do this, although it is known that the level of antibodies does not say anything about protection. The presence of antibodies only means that my body was in contact with the pathogen. Pharmaceutical companies give orders for research, as a rule, to professors in various clinics. And the professors have to study these vaccines on volunteers. If the pharmaceutical companies also give money to these professors, then the research results are always skewed in favor of the pharmaceutical companies. Recently, there have been several scandals because serious publications refused to publish such studies due to the fact that they were heavily manipulated, because the publications did not want to take responsibility for publishing such false studies. Therefore, these publications created their ethics commissions. But since these commissions also include people paid by the pharmaceutical industry, this does not change the situation much. Pharmaceutical companies provide statistics specialists to help professors. These professionals work with the numbers they receive from the professor and process them in a way that puts them in a positive light. There was a professor who was doing research on the effects of mercury. He had to conduct as many as three studies before a medical journal could eventually publish his results. I saw with my own eyes the results of the first study, which was not published. And if you compare them with the results of the third study, they were completely opposite. After the first study, the result showed that mercury in vaccines causes autism in children. In the third version, after many meetings and with representatives of the pharmaceutical companies and the regulatory agency, the result was manipulated to such a state that children who receive mercury vaccinations are allegedly even protected from autism. It was the third version of the study that was finally published. In my book, I wrote about this research and how such results were obtained. This professor, about whom I wrote, even wrote me a letter, but he was never able to refute the facts I wrote. And as a reward, this professor (his name is Professor Ferstraten) received a very high position in Brussels from the pharmaceutical company Glaxosmisklein. As you can see: it is only about money and nothing else. When a scientist in his research comes to the conclusion that the vaccine has serious side effects, that is, if negative information appears, the research is not published and disappears in the safes of the pharmaceutical industry. And their safes are very deep. And the pharmaceutical industry in such a case is not obliged to pay the scientist the promised fee. And the scientist himself does not have the right to publish his research, because it is the property of the pharmaceutical industry. Recently, there was a big scandal when one Scottish scientist did publish his research independently. He was immediately released. That is, he was not paid anything. Just imagine: he worked for years, spent a lot of money and will not receive a reward for it. It is clear that in this case it is very tempting to change the numbers so that everything matches. There is no study on the effectiveness of the vaccine that is neutral (the Robert Koch Institute in Germany confirmed this to me). That is, a study that was conducted by independent scientists with two groups of participants, as I described earlier, and which, moreover, would prove the benefits of vaccines. Such a study does not exist! So it turns out that the vaccine admission control services know about this, but they pass these vaccines as soon as they are ready. Why do diseases occur less often or disappear altogether? For more than 100 years, we have been told that it is precisely because of vaccination. Allegedly, diseases have been eradicated or nearly eradicated because we so diligently allow ourselves to be vaccinated. And if we stopped vaccinating, all these diseases would come back. Is it true? No, not true! Very simple things are responsible for reducing diseases. I would like to recommend Dr. Buchwald's book, Vaccination: The Business of Fear. His book contains many figures and charts that he took from official sources in various countries. And based on them, he was able to prove that each individual disease (against which we vaccinate) was already in the stage of extinction, in terms of its spread and severity, and only then did we begin to vaccinate against it. And then, in retrospect, it was impossible to claim that the vaccination allegedly worked. It would be too much to believe. And very, very simple things are responsible for reducing diseases. For example, full nutrition. The last time there was a famine in Switzerland was 150 years ago. Do we now, in Europe, understand what hunger is? We have no idea about it. We think about this when we watch footage from Africa or similar countries. Or maybe the older generation that survived the war imagines what hunger is like. By the mid-1960s, half of Swiss schoolchildren were malnourished. What do children look like today? Today, one child can be made into two, and a piece will remain for the third. Today we don't have diseases from malnutrition, today we have diseases from overeating. At the same time, we are not talking about the quality of food, but about its quantity. Today we have diseases because children eat too much. The next factor is clean drinking water. 50-100 years ago we did not have clean drinking water. Imagine today an African woman walking far to fetch a jug of water. And it's not even water, but a brown mass in which you wouldn't even wash your feet - we don't know such things today. Did you know that Switzerland and Germany are almost the only countries where you can drink clean water straight from the tap? We are spoiled, we are spoiled beyond measure. We take it for granted, and in fact we should be grateful for it. The next factor is hygiene. 200 years ago there wasn't even soap, so we invented perfume and powder. The dirt used to be simply scraped off. How about today? Today we have diseases because of excessive hygiene. Today, we come to the point where we say that children can and should play in the sand a little and have dirt in their mouths from time to time. And a few years ago, we were advised to disinfect children at least three times a day. We humans have a habit of falling from one extreme to another, and somehow we find the middle with difficulty. The next factor is dry and warm housing. This is the reason why tuberculosis retreated in us. In Western Europe, tuberculosis is almost no longer a topic thanks to dry and warm housing. And this achievement is not so old here, it spread only after the 2nd World War. These are the things that raise the level of our health. This is the soil for our health and if it is there, then I don't need to worry about anything else. Peace and prosperity are also important. And if I'm talking about well-being, then I don't have a university degreeand the size of your bank account. I mean when you're traveling the country and everything around you is orderly and safe. Peace reigns everywhere. You see well-kept houses, animals, people and you understand that we live well. Well-being is what it is now, unlike 70 years ago, peace, of course, too. And imagine a woman in Africa who runs for hours in the heat with one child in her hand, another on her back and another in her stomach, and on the way from one refugee camp to another, she is raped five more times, then I can't and I don't want to imagine it. We should pray that these things never come to us again in Europe and be thankful for what we have. This is peace and well-being and it also gives us health. Now I will offer you something that will shock many. But in the 20 years that I have been dealing with this topic, no one has yet been able to prove the opposite to me. No vaccination can protect us or our animals from diseases even for a few hours. No vaccination! A vaccinated person, if there is a threat of getting sick because of this, will get sick in the same way as an unvaccinated person. There is no difference! She will not get sick less or less often, or without complications, she will get sick just like another person. And we saw this during the mumps epidemic in Switzerland in 1999-2000. Then 15,000 children fell ill with mumps. Almost nothing was said about this epidemic at doctors' congresses. And all because of the fact that 75% of these 15,000 children were vaccinated according to all the rules, that is, they got vaccinated against mumps twice and still got sick. So, one conclusion can be drawn from this: if you want your child to get mumps, then vaccinate him. It was a joke. If possible, don't do it. Finally, I would like to briefly draw attention to our event. Every year, we hold a Swiss forum on the topic of vaccinations with 600-700 participants. Who would like to visit us - you can pick up an invitation to this forum at our book table. I also present to you the magazine "Impulse", which is the largest critical publication on the subject of vaccinations. The most recent edition tells about deaths after vaccination against cervical cancer. These magazines are also lying on the book table. I would also like to present to you my book in two volumes. It is called "Critical analysis of vaccination issues". About 30 to 40 pages with detailed information are devoted to vaccination against each disease. The second volume is devoted to vaccinations for tourist purposes, against malaria, jaundice, etc. Also in the second volume we talk about vaccinations for animals. In addition, I analyzed 130 vaccine ingredients, how they are made and how they affect people. The next book is for those who don't like to read a lot. It is much more subtle and is called "Around vaccinations", where I summarized only the most important. And at the end, my recommendation on vaccinations. In my opinion, there are only two groups of children who should not be vaccinated. The first group is sick children who cannot be vaccinated, and this is understandable. The second group, these are healthy children, and therefore they do not need vaccination at all. And in the case of proper homeopathic treatment, they will cope with the disease themselves. And those children who do not fall into any of these groups can be vaccinated, but I am afraid that such children will no longer be left. And my vision is that our next generations will be able to grow up healthy and without vaccinations. And they will be a healthy foundation for the future of humanity. I wanted to thank you for your long and patient attention.

from -

Sources/Links: -