Future Summit: What does the UN have planned for us?

19.09.2024 | www.kla.tv/30514

Our world today is facing major challenges and is in the midst of deep crises. Most people agree on that. But there are widely differing views on what the crises are and how to tackle them. The UN, for example, sees the world threatened by countless global shocks and describes the solution as improved "global governance" and, as before, Agenda 2030 and the achievement of its 17 sustainability goals. To get closer to this goal, the UN is holding the UN Future Summit from September 22 to 23, 2024. The heads of state and government of all 193 UN member states will meet in New York. The practical goal of the summit is to sign a future pact. The pact's commitments and the idea of ​​the future summit itself are part of a report, the so-called "Our Common Agenda". According to tradition, the member states of the United Nations at the 2020 UN General Assembly entrusted Secretary-General António Guterres with the task of developing recommendations on how to advance a common agenda and respond to current and future challenges. "Our Common Agenda" is now the Secretary-General's vision for a future of increased global cooperation. This vision contains eleven thematically different dossiers or papers, so-called policy briefs. Each policy brief identifies problems and solutions in a specific subject area. For example, the dossiers address the topics of "Outer Space", "International Financial Architecture" or "Youth Engagement", to name just a few. In short, the UN has remarkably developed a very comprehensive vision of how to make the world crisis-proof and a more peaceful place. But is the UN really the world savior that it claims to be with its "vision"? Is the problem analysis correct and, above all, are its intentions correct? We now take a critical look at the agenda. First of all, it must be noted that the "Common Agenda" was explicitly placed in the context of the 2030 Agenda. UN Secretary-General Guterres said: "With 'Our Common Agenda' we want to give new impetus to the 2030 Agenda and implement the goals for sustainable development in the lives of people everywhere." But do the 2030 Agenda and its 17 sustainability goals really lead to a "greener, better and safer future", as Guterres claims? In the program "Etetikettenschweel Agenda 2030" [www.kla.tv/18739 and www.kla.tv/Agenda2030], Klagemauer.TV has comprehensively analyzed how the sustainability goals are actually being implemented and who they serve - certainly not the crisis-ridden peoples! Let's look at specific examples from selected policy briefs that cast a very dubious light on the "Common Agenda": UN 2.0: This letter describes proposals for how the UN itself should be reformed. The point "Behavioral Sciences" is particularly striking. The UN writes on the subject: "In behavioral science, it is recognized that people do not always behave in a predictable way and that human behavior is often shaped by a variety of factors, including cognitive biases and mental shortcuts (subconscious simplistic thought patterns). If the United Nations organizations expand their behavioral science capabilities, we can increase the impact of our strategies and (...) create the potential for faster progress in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals." In other words: The UN wants to research and influence people's behavior in order to better achieve its goals! In addition to the fact that the application of behavioral science findings has a great potential for abuse, the question mentioned at the beginning also arises as to whether the UN's strategies really address the problems. One is inevitably reminded of the Covid times, when people were pressured to do "the right thing" with bratwurst and psychological warfare! Global Digital Compact: This pact, which the global community is to decide on, includes, among other things, that all people should be connected to the Internet. Access to the Internet should even be made a human right! Digital identity for everyone is also part of this, because this could, for example, help to ensure that social welfare payments can be paid out more effectively - or at least that is the suspiciously simple-minded idea of ​​the UN. Considering that António Guterres and Klaus Schwab launched a strategic partnership between the UN and the WEF in 2019, this Global Digital Pact appears in a completely different light: Is this the way people will move into the Transhumanism in which every person is physically connected to the Internet via nanorobots in the brain? Watch the Kla.TV program Yuval Noah Harari: "Humans are now hackable animals" [www.kla.tv/23931]. Another reform proposal concerning the Internet calls for the "introduction of accountability for discrimination and misleading content". The trend of political leaders putting the fight against so-called misinformation and disinformation at the top of their agenda is well known. EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen even described it at the World Economic Forum 2024 as a "main concern for the next two years". But does the UN also measure itself by its own standards and, in general, who defines misinformation and disinformation? This question leads us to the next policy brief: Emergency Platform: The complex global shocks of the recent past - as the UN calls them - have become more interconnected and dangerous, with greater global influence. That is why an emergency platform is needed that can be activated in the event of a crisis of sufficient severity and scope. Possible future causes of such shocks include pandemic risks, major climatic or biological events, incidents in cyberspace or space, or other, as yet unknown risks. The text states specifically: "The emergency platform would (...) focus on high-level convening and lobbying for a limited period of time and bring together actors who are able to make a meaningful contribution to the global response." Here it becomes clearer what the UN Secretary-General means by "strengthening global governance." In a future crisis in which the UN defines how great the danger is, the UN should also convene those actors who, in its eyes, are the right ones to solve the crisis. Less democracy is not possible! The Swiss civil rights activist of the Corona protest movement "MASS-VOLL", Nicolas Rimoldi, even speaks of a mutation of the UN into. In fact, such an emergency platform would mean the end of national sovereignty. Because whoever decides on the state of emergency is the sovereign. And in this case that would be the UN. But it is not just the grasp for temporary world domination that is scandalous, but also the foundation on which the UN is basing the emergency platform. For example, with regard to the "corona pandemic", which is repeatedly used as an example of a "complex global shock": The paper in question regrets that the coronavirus has destroyed four years of progress in combating poverty. But that is wrong! The RKI files that have been acquitted prove, for example in the case of Germany, that it was politically desired measures and not the virus that brought economic damage to the world. The same applies to the risk factor "major climatic events": While CO2 is mentioned as a driver of climate anomalies throughout the Common Agenda, the topic of geoengineering, i.e. weather manipulation, is consistently ignored. In other words: The UN bases its emergency platform on narratives that have been proven to be false and incomplete. In return, in the Global Digital Compact it claims to want to fight against misleading information, but it cannot meet its own standards. This means that the Common Agenda and with it the UN are losing a lot of credibility. International Financial Architecture: Another UN paper makes it clear how national sovereignty is to be handed over to non-democratic bodies: Policy Brief No. 6 calls for, among other things: - the UN member states should set up a coordination body for economic decisions, - the debt regulation of economically weak countries should be transferred to an expert body and - the major economies should strengthen macroeconomic coordination, e.g. by shifting it to the meeting of the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors This way of trying to tackle problems centrally through supranational "expert bodies" is a common thread. Apparently, Secretary-General Guterres believes that the bigger the problems, the more centralized and less democratic the solution must be. These intentions are frightening and do not bode well if the future pact is actually signed by the member states. But is there a reason why things are going exactly like this? The last part of this documentary deals with the roots of the UN and examines whether these centralist aspirations are systematic. The UN – a project of would-be world rulers? The predecessor organization of the UN was the League of Nations. It existed from 1920 to 1946 with the aim of securing world peace and settling international conflicts. The idea of ​​such a League of Nations was part of the 14-point plan of the then American President Woodrow Wilson. This plan was intended to bring peace to the world after the First World War and self-determination to the peoples. The creators of this supposedly peacemaking plan were none other than Walter Lippmann and Edward Mandell House - the later co-founders of the Council on Foreign Relations. The CFR, in turn, was founded for no other purpose than to help the USA or the masterminds behind it, international freemasonry, to achieve global supremacy. This think tank is still leaving its dirty trail through the world today. Watch the programs shown. [www.kla.tv/19404, www.kla.tv/26964, www.kla.tv/27426] Is it a coincidence that the alleged peace project League of Nations was conceived by people who only moved in super-rich circles and aspired to global power? Or was the League of Nations even a means to an end? We are following this trail further. Anyone who deals with the CFR will inevitably come across the name Rockefeller at some point. This extremely wealthy American family dynasty undoubtedly has enormous influence, including with its family foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation. Its most famous offspring, David Rockefeller, who died in 2017, was director of the CFR for 36 years. And there is actually a connection between this powerful banking family and the UN itself. Wikipedia writes: “The Rockefeller Foundation is closely intertwined with the private US elite think tank “Council on Foreign Relations” (CFR). The legendary "War and Peace Studies" of the CFR, which laid the foundations for the "organization" of the world after the Second World War and ultimately led to the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), NATO and the UN, were launched in 1939 by the Rockefeller Foundation and financed with 350,000 US dollars (equivalent to around 6 million US dollars in 2015)." The Rockefeller Foundation is officially considered to have played a key role in the founding of the United Nations. But the connections are even deeper: in 1947, David's grandfather, John D. Rockefeller Jr., gave the UN a check for 8.5 million US dollars to buy the land in New York City on which its headquarters were then built. It must be remembered that such a donation creates great dependency, because as we all know, you don't bite the hand that feeds you. We now ask: What could have been the Rockefellers' intention behind the creation of the United Nations and their further influence? We answer the question with a quote attributed to David Rockefeller: "It would have been impossible to develop our plan for the world if we had been exposed to the public spotlight during these years. But the world is now more advanced and ready to march towards a world government. The supranational rule of an intellectual elite and the world bankers is certainly preferable to the national self-determination practiced in previous centuries." The Rockefellers' aspirations cannot really be summed up any better. Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Conference, Trilateral Commission, World Economic Forum - the most powerful people in the world no longer sit in government buildings, but in the committees that were created by high finance for the purpose of power! Watch the Kla.TV documentary "Rockefeller Dynasty: One Step Ahead of World Events?". In his memoirs, David Rockefeller puts it even more clearly: "Some [ideological extremists] even believe that we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States. They accuse my family and me of being 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more unified global political and economic structure - 1ne Welt ("one world"), if you will. If that is the accusation, I plead guilty and I am proud of it." To summarize: The Rockefeller family, which had enormous power through its money and its institutions since at least the beginning of the last century, had created the idea of ​​the UN and supported it financially. At the same time, David Rockefeller, in the name of his family, committed himself to a centralized leadership of the world and also to the abolition of national sovereignty. The connection to the UN's currently obvious desire for global power cannot be denied. And apparently António Guterres also seems to get along well with the Rockefellers, pictured here with David Rockefeller Jr. Dear viewers, ifthese connections continue to be drowned out by the mainstream, the UN Future Summit will also be another building block on the way to an unfree, undemocratic and totalitarian world. So be part of the solution by spreading this program, talking to your neighbors, work colleagues, relatives, etc. about it! Get the opposing voices out there and help put an end to these attempts at world domination! Closing point: Excerpts from Ivo Sasek's AZK speech "The dissemination of such information, regardless of its nature, whether political, scientific, ideological, religious or whatever, I say your co-processing, your co-dissemination is one of the greatest solutions that currently exist. (...) We need media sovereignty for this. Do you understand? We need freedom of information. That is the solution, for now, for now - the first, the most important. Without it, people will remain in the dark. And that is why we are not people who only point out problems and do not offer solutions. Yes, we offer solutions. But the most important and indispensable of all practical solutions is you out there, you with us. (…) Everyone who hears and sees us today should carry everything that you hear and see from us out into the world. To the ends of the earth."

from jb

Sources/Links: Summit of the Future (Zukunftsgipfel): https://unric.org/en/the-summit-of-the-future-in-2024/
  Our Common Agenda: https://www.un.org/en/common-agenda
  RNE-Stellungnahme zu Our Common Agenda: https://www.nachhaltigkeitsrat.de/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/20220120_RNE_Stellungnahme_Our-Common-Agenda-Guterres-UN-Reformoptionen.pdf
  Policy Briefs: https://www.un.org/en/common-agenda/policy-briefs
  Policy Brief zum Thema Verhaltenswissenschaften: https://un-two-zero.network/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/UN2.0_PolicyBrief_BehaviouralScience.pdf
  Kurzzusammenfassung der elf Policy Briefs: https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/our-common-agenda-policy-briefs-a-quick-summary.pdf
  Schlüsselvorschläge (Key Proposals) zu den 12 Verpflichtungen der UNO-Erklärung zum 75-jährigen Bestehen: https://www.un.org/en/content/common-agenda-report/assets/pdf/Common_Agenda_Key_Proposals_English.pdf
  Strategische Partnerschaft der UNO und des WEF: https://www.weforum.org/press/2019/06/world-economic-forum-and-un-sign-strategic-partnership-framework/
  Von der Leyen über Fehl- und Desinformationen am WEF 2024: kla.tv/28200   Beitrag von Nicolas Rimoldi zum UNO-Zukunftsgipfel: https://www.tell-news.ch/p/der-neue-uno-zukunftspakt-beendet
  Völkerbund als Idee von W. Lippmann und E. M. House: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/V%C3%B6lkerbund#
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Mandell_House
  Verbindung Rockefeller Foundation und UNO: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_of_Thirty
  John D. Rockefeller Jr.‘s Spende an die UNO: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_D._Rockefeller,_Jr.
  Umstrittenes Zitat von David Rockefeller: https://yoice.net/david-rockefelle-wir-sind-dankbar-gegenueber/
  Zitat David Rockefeller aus dem Buch „Memoiren“: https://archive.org/details/DavidRockefellerMemoirs2003RandomHouse/page/n482/mode/2up
  AZK-Rede von Ivo Sasek: kla.tv/29964#t=523     Bildquellen: John D. Rockefeller III. übergibt Scheck im Wert von 8.5 Mio. US-$ an UNO: https://dam.media.un.org/CS.aspx?VP3=DamView&VBID=2AM94S6P1SM5W&PN=2&WS=SearchResults&FR_=1&W=1536&H=711
  Handshake António Guterres und David Rockefeller Jr.: https://dam.media.un.org/asset-management/2AM9LOLQ3J54?FR_=1&W=1536&H=711
Ticket: SE-1369