Lawyer Frank Hannig: Coercion in 83 million cases?

15.09.2024 | www.kla.tv/30477

Were these blackenings of the RKI protocols made to cover up criminal offenses? I'm Frank Hannig - that's Hannig's right, and that's actually what struck me when I read these now unblackened protocols. You won't believe it. I'll take you by the hand and explain to you what actually happened here. And why it's a scandal and why we really have to think about it. First of all, it was like this: The RKI protocols reflect the current status of the federal government, as it was informed during the Corona period. So the RKI had scientific findings, informed the federal government about them, and on the basis of this information the federal government issued laws, measures, regulations and so on to protect us all from Corona. So much for the normal and official part. But we've always had a bit of doubt - vaccines released too quickly, constitution or civil liberties restricted, mask requirement. Many people said back then that this had to be checked. Now a small newspaper has managed to sue for these protocols to be handed over so that we can independently check what the RKI actually said to the government during the Corona period, so that they could in turn restrict our rights. And this newspaper managed it. Lauterbach, our health minister, justified it by saying that these blackouts are necessary to protect employee data, for example. Yes, so that third parties are protected and data protection is not violated. And now I saw these pictures for the first time a few days ago. This is supposed to be third-party data? This file is completely blacked out. And you ask yourself: Why? Why is this file blacked out? The way this file is blacked out, there must be a reason why the government doesn't want it to come out. So there must be something to cover up, and a whistleblower came forward - in the RKI - and said: This is a disgrace. Yes, the public is being deceived here, I'm publishing it unblacked out. That's what happened. And the crazy thing is, it's not just a scandal in terms of media law. It's a breach of trust by the government. I - I don't even talk about stories like that. No, when you read the unredacted minutes, it turns out that crimes were clearly committed here by Minister Spahn, by Minister Lauterbach, and perhaps by others as well, and a very simple crime, a very simple one that I'm going to explain to you now because I want it to be discussed publicly. So that it doesn't disappear into a small drawer somewhere. The media doesn't report much about it. The official media say something. Yes, data protection scandal! It's not a scandal at all, it's just nonsense. No, the scandal is this: the crime that ultimately lies behind this is a very simple paragraph. Paragraph 240 - Criminal Code - Coercion contains the following. I'll take you on a journey. I'll just explain it again. Yes, so that you understand how we lawyers think and then... I want you to understand. Paragraph 240 states: Whoever, by force or by threat of serious harm, unlawfully compels another person to do, tolerate or refrain from doing an act shall be punished with a fine or with imprisonment. Now let's go through it the way a lawyer does it. Let's look at the wording. First of all - we have no use of violence. Now comes the point - who by threatening us with a serious evil... What serious evil did Mr Spahn, Mr Lauterbach, did the government threaten us with? And in 83 million cases. That is the spectacular thing, because the serious evil that we were threatened with are the consequences that will occur if I do not do something specific, namely if I do not get vaccinated. First of all, social exclusion: you are antisocial and you lack solidarity. You are not allowed to cross national borders and you are only allowed to go 20 metres from your house. You will be fired as a firefighter if you do not get vaccinated. You will be thrown out as a doctor or nurse if you do not get vaccinated. You will suffer disadvantages in every respect if you do not get vaccinated. That is all a threat of a serious evil. Namely, the threat of dismissal is an evil - of course it is an evil. The threat of dismissal in order to force me to commit an act, namely to be vaccinated or, because of me, to tolerate it, namely to be vaccinated. That is the criminal offense. It is so simple. In 83 million cases we were coerced. Now there is the little word "illegality" in there and you could, I want you to really understand it and that's why I'm making it a bit legal. You could now say, well, but the government did it too, it must be legal. No, that is the problem that arises from the minutes now. To close the loop at the end, yes, it can only be legal if the Bundestag passes a law. Yes, but if the Bundestag is deceived by the government and has false information, then such a law cannot be legal. So then all these Corona regulations cannot work. That is then not legal. We learn from these unredacted minutes that the government knowingly lied about the actual recommendations of the Robert Koch Institute. All the blacked-out sections show that the RKI has raised serious concerns about many, many issues, particularly with regard to vaccination and the effectiveness of boosters, e.g. booster vaccinations for children, etc. This is what the government was told. The ministers intervened directly and said that this information must not be published. So they deliberately manipulated the truth in order to ultimately push through this mandatory vaccination. And that is the real scandal. And this scandal must be dealt with, and that can only be done by the public prosecutor. It is a criminal offence. Each of us must answer for our actions and that must happen here too. I will file a complaint against Spahn today - just as an example - and you can also do that via the police website, via the online police. The public prosecutor must wake up. The Federal Prosecutor General must be made aware that there was coercion in 83 million cases. This is the biggest scandal, a government that has committed a criminal offence in this way and then blacked out and falsified these records to cover up and conceal this crime. I don't think anything like this has ever happened in a constitutional state. We just have to understand the dimension of it. This did not happen because we wanted to protect the personal and data protection rights of third parties. This happened in order to hide and conceal crimes.

from ag.

Sources/Links: https://t.me/EsReichtSachsen/349