RKI files as evidence in court: Compulsory vaccination in nursing care unconstitutional?!

09.09.2024 | www.kla.tv/30404

For the first time, on September 3, 2024, a court found that the facility-related vaccination requirement during the Corona period was probably unconstitutional: A nursing assistant from Lower Saxony has filed a lawsuit against a ban on entry and work issued by the Osnabrück district in 2022. She had received this when she did not comply with the facility-related vaccination requirement. The NDR reported: "From the point of view of the Osnabrück judges, the nursing vaccination requirement violated the fundamental right to physical integrity and freedom of occupation. [...] In spring 2022, the Federal Constitutional Court declared the nursing vaccination requirement to be legal. In the meantime, however, the independence of the authorities' decision-making process has to be called into question, the Osnabrück Administrative Court ruled. As the plaintiff nursing assistant argues, it was already known at the time that a corona vaccination does not prevent infections. This is evident from the RKI protocols published this spring." The court continues in its press release: "Due to the protocols now available from the Covid-19 crisis team of the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) and the witness hearing of Prof. Dr. Schaade, President of the RKI, carried out today in this context, the independence of the authorities' decision-making must be called into question." This has far-reaching consequences. The online newspaper Tichys Einblick writes: "In future, the judiciary will no longer be able to rely on the scientific independence of the RKI with its court decisions." The responsible administrative court suspended the lawsuit on September 3, 2024 and referred the question to the Federal Constitutional Court, since the administrative court itself does not have the so-called authority to reject norms. Now the Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe is to decide whether the facility-related vaccination requirement (don't read: Section 20a IfSG as amended on March 18, 2022) and the associated ban on activities violated the fundamental right to physical integrity and freedom of occupation. The data analyst Tom Lausen was present at the court hearing in Osnabrück and commented on it as follows: The court had selected various parts of the protocol and actually wanted to ask what Mr. Schaade had to say about it. And so the RKI protocols - both the redacted ones initially obtained by Paul Schreyer through an IFG request and the later leaked ones - were used legally for the first time. The court introduced these protocols with a total of 57 pages and then always made them available to Mr. Schaade and his companion. And they then had to make statements on certain questions, including the pandemic of the unvaccinated and many, many other questions. And the court did an excellent job of that. So the chairman in particular was very, very, very, very specific. He asked very, very precise questions. Very special things have come to light. Yes, the special thing that has now come to light was not clear to anyone, not even to the Federal Constitutional Court, and I think everyone is incredibly dismayed. What is special is that Mr. Schaade has revealed that the issue of risk assessment i.e. upgrading a level of danger, is clearly not necessarily subject to the RKI's professional assessment, but is a political directive, but possibly a so-called management issue, as he always called it. So there were scientific issues and management issues and Mr. Schaade clearly placed it in the area of ​​management issues, so that we now know from Mr. Schaade that the risk upgrade for the lockdown - it was not said directly, but you can now clearly see it from the explanations - the risk upgrade is a management order or organizational management order. So, I just got the information. In fact, the chamber has decided and according to the report (I wasn't there), the chamber considers the facility-related proof requirement, i.e. the vaccination requirement for doctors, to be unconstitutional at least from November 7th, 2022. The explanation in court or the justification is still pending and there is probably a so-called referral order. This means that the Federal Constitutional Court will now have to decide on exactly this period. Will the Federal Constitutional Court hold those responsible to account and name the injustice that has occurred? Kla.TV will follow the now pending decision of the Federal Constitutional Court with millions of citizens who were put under massive pressure during the Corona period! Explosive passages from the transcript of the court hearing by data analyst Tom Lausen are shown in the credits. The telling exchanges between the presiding judge and RKI President Lars Schaade has published NiUS.

from Tabea S.

Sources/Links: Corona-Prozess um Pflegehelferin geht ans Bundesverfassungsgericht (4.9.24) https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/niedersachsen/osnabrueck_emsland/Corona-Prozess-um-Pflegehelferin-geht-ans-Bundesverfassungsgericht,corona11594.html
Höchstgericht soll entscheiden: Verletzte die einrichtungsbezogene Impfpflicht Grundrechte? (3.9.24) https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/gesundheit-oekologie/bundesverfassungsgericht-soll-entscheiden-verletzte-die-einrichtungsbezogene-impfpflicht-grundrechte-li.2250761
Presseinformation Nr. 19-2024 Verwaltungsgericht Osnabrück legt Bundesverfassungsgericht Entscheidung über einrichtungs- und unternehmensbezogene Nachweispflicht vor https://www.verwaltungsgericht-osnabrueck.niedersachsen.de/aktuelles/pressemitteilungen/verwaltungsgericht-osnabruck-legt-bundesverfassungsgericht-entscheidung-uber-einrichtungs-und-unternehmensbezogene-nachweispflicht-vor-235240.html
Datenanalyst Tom Lausen kommentiert die Gerichtsverhandlung (3.9.24) https://t.me/tomdabassman/6046
https://t.me/tomdabassman/6048
Holger Douglas: Pfleger-Impfpflicht verfassungswidrig – Nach RKI-Files: Folgenreicher Beschluss des Verwaltungsgerichts Osnabrück“ (4.9.24) https://www.tichyseinblick.de/daili-es-sentials/verwaltungsgericht-osnabrueck-pfleger-impfpflicht/
Wortwechsel zwischen dem vorsitzenden Richter und RKI-Präsident Lars Schaade https://www.nius.de/corona/rki-chef-gesteht-vor-gericht-politische-einflussnahme-selbstverstaendlich-weisungen-nehmen-wir-entgegen/8b75463b-bf64-4910-adbb-b88fd39fbdea