“Target child and attachment”: AXION Resist press symposium (short version)

26.07.2024 | www.kla.tv/29897

In Germany, children are systematically separated or isolated from their mothers or fathers by family courts and youth welfare offices, sometimes even abducted by force, on the basis of false information. In order to give those affected a voice, the “AXION Resist” association held a press symposium on May 3rd of this year with the theme: “Target children and attachment”. • Did you know that in Germany 80-90,000 children are taken away from their parents every year, often irreversibly? • Did you know that children of refugees have become a popular target of youth welfare offices, while their parents, without any knowledge of the language or the law, have to watch helplessly? • Did you know that the German Federal Center for Health Education (BZgA) has developed “Standards for the sexual education of children in Europe” together with the WHO? And in doing so, they are already shamelessly preparing them for paedophilia attacks? Child welfare and protection concepts are terms that can no longer be referred to without prejudice these days. On the contrary, they require more than ever a discussion of how they are used. If body exploration rooms in daycare centers are intended to prevent abuse, early childhood education about multiple genders is intended to promote tolerance, and military exercises in schools are intended to promote peace, then there is an urgent need for real counter-enlightenment, which is starting today with the AxionResist symposium. Because to date, the mainstream media has only presented a striking representation at broadcast times when good citizens are already asleep. But here the motto is: open your eyes! We celebrate World Children's Day every year on September 2nd, we are all very happy and the ministry announces wonderful slogans and always repeats the same sentences. The reality of life looks dramatically different from what our highest courts and the European courts announce. The state is obliged to create regulations that are suitable for the development of family ties and must take measures that enable people to live together. What we are experiencing are measures that dissolve and destroy family ties. A society that ignores and fights motherly love, that degenerates, degenerates, brutalizes, stupidizes, and that is exactly what we are unfortunately seeing in Germany. The term "child welfare" keeps cropping up here. When we hear this word, we now have to wince, because when "child welfare" is mentioned, the opposite is usually the case. It is about causing the child as much harm as possible. Children are defenseless and can endure a lot. These are typical statements from Dr. Andrea Christidis. So all this alleged child protection, I have already spoken about the SOS Children's Villages. There is an investigation report on the Internet, which I have also provided as a link below. 160 children were sexually abused, raped and even impregnated in SOS Children's Villages, and then had abortions performed. And the SOS Children's Villages are still asking for donations, it really makes me sick, I just have to say it. We have to get away from always believing that the state always wants something good for us. The state usually doesn't want anything good for us, because it actually only wants what's best for us, as you know, and that's our money and our children. This classic case from 2018 of years of sexual abuse on a campsite, in a rotten property with a caravan, the youth welfare office took children to a foster father, and he sexually abused the children there, and the youth welfare office provided fresh meat. That's absurd. The parliamentary committee of inquiry started in March, I am very excited to see what comes out of it, because the responsibility of youth welfare offices, judges, family judges and society as a whole is becoming very clear here. In family law, there is no motion for bias against youth welfare office employees, nor against legal counsel. So it is said that they always work correctly, they are untouchable. Removing children from their homes does not protect children, in very few, very rare cases. The studies by Dr. Helmut Kentler, who for over 30 years worked with youth welfare offices nationwide to place children with pedophiles, have already been mentioned. They used to be youth welfare office employees, they are now heads and they still work in youth welfare offices. And the names of the Kentler studies, the investigators, the researchers, have strongly criticized this, they are being kept under lock and key. That means that people are allowed to do this with the consent of our state, otherwise these names would be made public. Ladies and gentlemen, for many, many decades this monstert many lodges and gogen trained at universities, at institutes and God knows what. And all those who are here today and repeat the same thing are all cut out of this spirit. I am not surprised. I am surprised that the University of Bielefeld has at least clearly stated what is going on, that the whole thing is criminal and nothing else. And it did so in two reports. This is a pedosexual network across academic institutions. This is not just Berlin, mind you, this is not just Berlin. And so are the parties, especially the Green Party, which called for the decriminalization of pedosexuality. We are currently sacrificing our children for fantasies, for sexual perversions, for medical errors. What we have now is a Generation Alpha, over 70 percent of which is psychologically stressed thanks to the Corona period that we had to go through and thanks to decisions by our politicians to put children behind masks for eight hours, to force lockdowns on children, to force distance learning and social isolation on children. That was certainly not a sign of the state's attention to the welfare of children. It was a disregard for the welfare of children. So we see that not much is left of the original natural law approach, the duty of parents first and foremost to care for and raise their children. The guardian state is massively intervening in this relationship. End of the line Corona. Here we have clearly seen the guardian state overlaying the legal sphere of children and parents to the point of excess. And we must be clear about what has happened here. Over the last four years, harm and killing have been sacrificed on the altar of what is called health, on the altar of a completely fanatical society that has followed a completely insane idol of state obedience and health. The constitutional and legislative authorities have deliberately undermined parental rights. Nothing of natural law is left. This is why the state can at any time gain unbridled access to the child and enforce this access through punitive measures against parents. But parenthood and families are pre-existent. They existed before the state. Therefore, the state has no greater right over children than their parents themselves. State support for children must therefore be limited to emergencies and the creation of a child-friendly environment. It is crystal clear and completely understandable that there is a fundamental, vital bond between child and mother that no one can interfere with. Foster parents are a wonderful thing when parents are no longer alive or there is a real, serious danger to children. I would like to say that again emphatically, because there are some really great foster parents. But foster parents can never have a bond with a child. They can have a good relationship. But there is a difference. I will explain it now: From the fourth month of pregnancy, cells are transferred between mother and child - the child gets cells from the mother into its own body via the placenta and the umbilical cord, and vice versa, the mother gets cells from the child into her body and these almost always remain there for life. This is called microchimerism, and it actually happens. Shortly before birth, the density of oxytocin receptors increases significantly - you don't have to remember this - which significantly strengthens the mother-child bond. The mother-child bond is the closest thing that evolution has produced, demonstrable at the level of earthworms. I would not rule out, of course not rule out, that there are successful adoptions. I would also not rule out that there are same-sex couples who somehow manage to do this in individual cases. But to make this defective situation the norm and, above all, to throw the entire biology, to which I have devoted my life for decades, into the rubbish heap - that is more or less how it is done - is simply not acceptable. The most prominent example of measures that then make a rigorous cut in this regard are the taking into care, the removal of children from households or at least from the environment in which they normally live. Despite these clear legal requirements, there are always, and perhaps regularly, one could say, cases in which taking into care is criticized by youth welfare offices and family courts. It is criticized that in many cases children are taken from their families too quickly without there being an acute risk situation. This usually leads to traumatic experiences for the children affected and of course shakes their trust in the youth welfare office and support system. It is afterIt has been proven that our youth welfare offices know what they are doing, I would like to tell you that. If they take a child away from a family, they know that this child will be severely disturbed. At some point, however, the youth welfare office was given such a position of power that it practically brought the entire system into play and took everything with it. But as long as youth welfare offices have this power, they will wash everything away, and the judges are also under pressure. If they work against the youth welfare office, they can hardly keep it up. So, and the main problem is the self-conviction and economic advantages of the profiteers. This includes politicians, I can tell you that, because politicians usually sit on the youth welfare committee and thus determine authorities, namely the youth welfare offices in general, and the home operators in particular. And they are of the opinion that child protection is best achieved outside the biological family. And if children are then removed preventively without there being any real evidence, then in my opinion it is a crime. As we have heard today, family courts do not hold public hearings. Those involved can therefore believe whatever they like. It never gets out. And who of them likes to admit that they have been deceived for a long period of time? Unfortunately, a system of lies is being launched. Because although family courts have a duty to establish the truth under Section 138 of the Code of Civil Procedure, untrue factual claims are not examined. Imagine that. In family courts, there is basically no witness evidence. This means that witnesses are not summoned to German family courts. So if you say: "But he can confirm that I did not do it," he will not be summoned. Children are our future. Children are human beings who come from an intimate relationship between a man and a woman and only between a man and a woman. And children are spiritually at the center of divine expectations, even from the point of view of creation. I fight for the well-being of our dear children because I love all children. They are brilliant little people, created in the image of God. I love the shining eyes, and I think children need an available mom and dad so that they can really succeed. What can we do about it? What can we do for the future? Because in the end, we as adults don't care. The children suffer every day. The children are destroyed every day. What do we do? What are our chances? Because, for example, on June 9th we have European elections. What are we doing here? That was my question, because it hurts for us as adults, for parents and ultimately for the children. We will start making video documentation with those affected from June 2024 this month and will publish documents so that we can show evidence and are not seen as conspiracy theorists. It is extremely interesting how courts act and it is understandable that they fear like the devil fears holy water that their senseless, illegal actions will be documented in this way. The names of the perpetrators must be named. We already said it earlier. The names of the experts must be named. The names of the judges must be named. Yes, we must educate, of course, and we must all network. That is the main point, and we simply cannot have so many chiefs everywhere, but everyone must be able to work together and not everyone must think that I am much better than the others. That is a huge problem. Those with a lot of money have long recognized that and that is how they do it. But the small associations and the like, they all always want to be a chief somehow. It is like in the parties. Everyone wants their job, no matter how good they are. I just wanted to say it very briefly. There is a need for reappraisal. The victims of this policy must be rehabilitated. The perpetrators must be punished. New excesses must be prevented through massive education, especially of the population, who know nothing. Of doctors, school staff, the administration, judges, public prosecutors and the police, and independent institutions must be created to review the opinions spread by politicians. And we must stand up against this; we must not let our children go through fire for these idols.

from abu.

Sources/Links: 5-Minütige Kurzversion von Axion Resist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqVVkr4yBZI
AXION Resist https://axionresist.com/
Symposium in voller Länge: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANBC_OkQc2A