This website uses cookies. Cookies help us to provide our services. By using our services, you consent to our use of cookies. Your data is safe with us. We do not pass on your analysis or contact data to third parties! Further information can be found in the data protection declaration.
Subtitle "Afrikaans" was produced by machine.Subtitle "አማርኛ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "العربية " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Ārāmāyâ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "azərbaycan dili " was produced by machine.Subtitle "беларуская мова " was produced by machine.Подзаглавието "България" е създадено от машина.Subtitle "বাংলা " was produced by machine.Subtitle "བོད་ཡིག" was produced by machine.Subtitle "босански" was produced by machine.Subtitle "català" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Cebuano" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ગુજરાતી" was produced by machine.Subtitle "corsu" was produced by machine.Podtitul "Čeština" byl vytvořen automaticky.Subtitle "Cymraeg" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Dansk" was produced by machine.Untertitel "Deutsch" wurde maschinell erzeugt.Subtitle "Untertitel" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Ελληνικά" was produced by machine.Subtitle "English" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Esperanto" was produced by machine.El subtítulo "Español" se generó automáticamente.Subtitle "Eesti" was produced by machine.Subtitle "euskara" was produced by machine.Subtitle "فارسی" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Suomi" was produced by machine.Le sous-titre "Français" a été généré automatiquement.Subtitle "Frysk" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Gaeilge" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Gàidhlig" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Galego" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Schwizerdütsch" was produced by machine.Subtitle "هَوُسَ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Ōlelo Hawaiʻi" was produced by machine.Subtitle "עברית" was produced by machine.Subtitle "हिन्दी" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Mẹo" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Hrvatski" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Kreyòl ayisyen " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Magyar" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Հայերեն" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Bahasa Indonesia " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Asụsụ Igbo " was produced by machine.Textun"Íslenska" var framkvæmt vélrænt.Sottotitoli "Italiano" sono stati generati automaticamente.Subtitle "日本語" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Basa Jawa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ქართული" was produced by machine.Subtitle "қазақ тілі " was produced by machine.Subtitle "ភាសាខ្មែរ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ಕನ್ನಡ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "한국어" was produced by machine.Subtitle "कोंकणी語" was produced by machine.Subtitle "کوردی" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Кыргызча" was produced by machine.Subtitle " lingua latina" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Lëtzebuergesch" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Lingala" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ພາສາ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Lietuvių" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Latviešu" was produced by machine.Subtitle "fiteny malagasy" was produced by machine.Subtitle "te reo Māori" was produced by machine.Subtitle "македонски јазик" was produced by machine.Subtitle "malayāḷaṁ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "မြန်မာစာ " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Монгол хэл" was produced by machine.Subtitle "मराठी" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Bahasa Malaysia" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Malti" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ဗမာစာ " was produced by machine.Subtitle "नेपाली" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Nederlands" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Norsk" was produced by machine.Subtitle "chiCheŵa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ਪੰਜਾਬੀ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Polska" was produced by machine.Subtitle "پښتو" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Português" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Română" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Язык жестов (Русский)" was produced by machine.Субтитры "Pусский" были созданы машиной.Subtitle "Kinyarwanda" was produced by machine.Subtitle "सिन्धी" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Deutschschweizer Gebärdensprache" was produced by machine.Subtitle "සිංහල" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Slovensky" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Slovenski" was produced by machine.Subtitle "gagana fa'a Samoa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "chiShona" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Soomaaliga" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Shqip" was produced by machine.Subtitle "србски" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Sesotho" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Basa Sunda" was produced by machine.Undertext "Svenska" är maskinell skapad.Subtitle "Kiswahili" was produced by machine.Subtitle "தமிழ்" was produced by machine.Subtitle "తెలుగు" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Тоҷикй" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ภาษาไทย" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ትግርኛ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Tagalog" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Türkçe" was produced by machine.Subtitle "татар теле" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Українська " was produced by machine.Subtitle "اردو" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Oʻzbek" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Tiếng Việt" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Serbšćina" was produced by machine.Subtitle "isiXhosa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ייִדיש" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Yorùbá" was produced by machine.Subtitle "中文" was produced by machine.Subtitle "isiZulu" was produced by machine.
kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV не носи отговорност за некачествен превод.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV nenese žádnou odpovědnost za chybné překlady.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV übernimmt keine Haftung für mangelhafte Übersetzung.kla.TV accepts no liability for inadequate translationkla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV no se hace responsable de traducciones incorrectas.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV n'assume aucune responsabilité en cas de mauvaise traduction.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV nem vállal felelősséget a hibás fordításértkla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV tekur enga ábyrgð á áræðanleika þýðingarinnarKla.TV non si assume alcuna responsabilità per traduzioni lacunose e/o errate.Kla.TV は、不適切な翻訳に対して一切の責任を負いません。kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV не несет ответственности за некачественный перевод.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.Kla.TV tar inget ansvar för felaktiga översättningar.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.
One World Government of the UN through Agenda 2030?
What does the UN bring to the world community? Has it achieved the main objective stated in its charter? Does its Agenda 2030 promote peaceful societies? And which influence does the Rockefeller-family have on the UN? In this program, we take you on an exciting journey to the beginnings of this governmental organization and find out what it looks like under the cover of fine words and what we will face in the future if the actual goals of the 2030 Agenda are implemented.
[continue reading]
If the thesis is that the UN helps to build up a “One-World-Government”, then the Rockefeller family and the UN would have to be connected. That means the total and ultimate control of all mankind is [...] wrapped up in nice words. And the whole thing is not a fantasy or a discussion, these are the goals decided by the UN. Back in June 2019, the World Economic Forum and the UN signed a strategic partnership agreement to accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. Various organizations are openly striving for world power for example through the UN. Germany, for example, is also actively working on the complete abolition of democracy. It now depends on whether the nations wake up and the people take their destiny and the fate of their country into their own hands again.
From September 19 through Saturday, September 23, and Tuesday, September 26, 2023, the United Nations General Assembly will meet in New York. Heads of state and government will meet at UN headquarters, a total of 193 countries represented in the UN out of a total of 195 countries. Regarding the current General Assembly, the UN writes, among other things, that they want to reignite a feeling of hope, optimism and enthusiasm for the 2030 Agenda. But what does the 2030 Agenda include and what goals are pursued here? Before we address these questions, first a few words about the UN and its history.
UN foundation and prehistory
The predecessor of the United Nations or UN was the League of Nations, which was founded in 1920 after the First World War. Its official goal was “to promote international cooperation and to achieve peace as well as security.” On April 18, 1946, the League of Nations dissolved at its 21st Assembly. It was replaced by the founding of the United Nations. All of its assets were transferred to the new organization. The United Nations officially describes its founding as follows:
“When World War II ended in 1945, nations lay in ruins and the world wanted peace. Representatives from 50 countries gathered at the United Nations Conference on an International Organization in San Francisco, California, from April 25 to June 26, 1945. For the next two months, they worked to draft and then sign the UN Charter, creating a new international organization, the United Nations, which, it was hoped, would prevent another world war like the one we had just experienced.”
Securing world peace is still one of the most important tasks of the UN according to its charter. Is this true or is the UN being used to build a one-world government under this guise? A quote attributed to David Rockefeller raises questions in this regard. Speaking before the United Nations Economic Committee in 1994, he said: “We are on the verge of a global transformation, all we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” So, if the thesis is that the UN is helping to build a “One World Government,” the Rockefeller family and the UN must be linked.
The UN and the Rockefeller family
It is interesting to know that the Rockefeller Foundation made a decisive contribution to the organization of the world after World War II. It was the studies by the Council on Foreign Relations that were funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and ultimately led to the creation of the World Bank, NATO, and the UN, among others. John D. Rockefeller had already donated a library to the predecessor of the UN, the League of Nations. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon mentioned this in a speech in 2012:
“I am honored to be here on this 85th anniversary of the historic donation of John D. Rockefeller Junior to the League of Nations Library. It is fitting that we are naming this room after him. I thank the family for donating the portrait of John D. Rockefeller that was displayed at the Rockefeller Foundation for 65 years. The Rockefeller family has lived up to this conviction, providing immense support for the League of Nations and the United Nations over the years.”
John D. Rockefeller also donated the land, 7 hectares (equivalent to about the size of 10 soccer fields) on the east bank of Manhattan, where the cornerstone for the UN Headquarters in New York was laid on October 24, 1949. The Rockefeller Foundation together with the Rockefeller family had and still has a considerable influence on the creation and development of the UN. This is already shown by the connections to the last three UN Secretaries General:
Kofi Annan was UN Secretary-General from 1997 to 2006. He is the recipient of the 2009 David Rockefeller Bridging Leadership Award. He was present at the presentation of David Rockefeller’s memoirs, and the statement from Rockefeller Foundation after his death was: “Kofi Annan was one of our longest and strongest partners.”
António Guterres and Ban Ki-moon also appear to have a good connection to the Rockefeller family. Ban Ki-moon was UN Secretary-General from 2007 to 2016, and is seen here meeting with David Rockefeller. Ban Ki-moon gave an acceptance speech in 2012, as mentioned earlier, mentioning that the Rockefeller family has been immensely supportive of the United Nations over the years. António Guterres has been UN secretary-general since 2017. In the photos shown, he meets with Ariana Rockefeller and David Rockefeller Junior.
Agenda 2030
Now back to the Agenda 2030 – what is behind it, or rather what goals is the UN pursuing with it? Kla-tv has already commented on Agenda 2030 in the program “Fraudulent labeling Agenda 2030 – the way the UN is dragging the world into the abyss”. (www.kla.tv/19141) How did the 2030 Agenda come about? It originally began with Agenda 21, a UN action program adopted in 1992 that contains concrete recommendations for action in development and environmental policy for the 21st century. With Agenda 2030 adopted by the UN in 2015, the goals of Agenda 21 were further developed and now apply equally to all countries. The current meeting now serves to review the implementation of the 2030 Agenda with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Has the implementation of Agenda 2030 so far shown at all that the UN wants to promote the world community? Or is its implementation gradually leading the world into the abyss or, in other words, into a one-world government?
Investigative journalist Thomas Roeper comments on the 2030 Agenda in more details in his book “Inside Corona.” He writes: “The 2030 Agenda was adopted by the states of the UN and the fact that there is a separate catalog of measures in Germany for this already shows a central problem: Each state interprets the goals in its own way.”
The following are key points of the 2030 Agenda that should be looked at in more detail. The 16th key point reads: “Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.”
Sub-item 16.9 states: “By 2030, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration.”
This point, i.e. the creation of a uniform legal or even digital identity for all the people of this world, is already in full swing with ID2020. ID2020 plans a transnational digital identity to complement state systems. All information about the individual should come together here: Education and vaccination certificates, financial status; accounts on Facebook, data produced by the smartphone.
That means the total and ultimate control of the whole mankind is [...] packed in nice words. And the whole thing is not a fantasy or a discussion, these are goals decided by the UN, which are being worked on and billions are being spent on their implementation. ID2020 also shows the connection to the Rockefeller family. The Rockefeller Foundation is one of the central organizations behind ID2020.
Funding of the 2030 Agenda
According to its own information, the UN needs five to seven trillion dollars a year to finance the 2030 Agenda, that is $5,000 to $7,000 billion. By comparison, Germany’s annual gross national product is about $4,000 billion. By the way, the UN is financed by contributions from the member states. According to the UN, in order to provide these huge sums, it needs, among other things, to promote public-private partnerships, another goal of the 2030 Agenda!
Public-private partnerships
What does this mean when public-private partnerships are to be promoted? Thomas Roeper goes into detail about this in his book and writes: (p.46) "It is [...] about giving corporations more influence over the UN, or, to put it in geopolitical terms, it is about increasing the power of corporations at the expense of nation states. The corporations want to make the rules and no longer have to obey the laws of the nation-states. In the long run, they want to disempower nation-states (and especially their parliaments, which can pass 'disruptive' laws). To disguise this erosion of democracy, good-sounding terms like 'public-private partnership' are invented; it reassures the public."
In addition to large corporations, the public-private partnership also aims at increasing the influence of oligarchs. Thomas Roeper understands oligarchs as people and organizations that “exercise power over a region” through their wealth, such as the Rockefeller Foundation or the World Economic Forum. Back in June 2019, the World Economic Forum and the UN signed a strategic partnership agreement to accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. Thus various organizations are openly seeking world power through, for example, the UN. This is by no means an exaggeration, according to Roeper.
Germany, for example, is also actively working on the complete abolition of democracy, as stated in a document from the Federal Ministry of the Interior called the “Smart City Charter”. This was published in May 2017 and is available to Kla.TV. Under the heading “Vision of a hypernetworked planet”, it is written as point 6:
Post-Voting Society: (society in which elections are no longer held) “Because we know exactly what people do and want, there is less need for elections, majority rule, or voting. Behavioral data can replace democracy as the society’s feedback system.”
In the future, people should be digitally recorded and controlled so thoroughly that you can deduct from the data what the majority wants. A reason to no longer have to hold elections or to make decisions without elections. Furthermore, the Smart City concept writes about the Post-Ownership Society: (Society in which private property no longer exists) “Thanks to the information about available shared goods and resources, it makes less sense to own something: Perhaps private property will indeed become a luxury. Data could complement or replace money as a currency.”
How on earth can such ideas be published openly? The abolition of democracy or private property would be against the law and should be punished. In fact, according to Thomas Roeper, it happens anyway. They have been working on it openly for years.
In summary, it can be seen that the “UN Sustainable Development Goals” are really about a slow but steady increase in the power and influence of the UN because the states are being disempowered step by step. Democracy and ultimately, the nation states are gradually being abolished. Given the beginnings of the UN and the obvious influence of the Rockefeller Foundation, the question arises: Was the creation of a one-world government one of its hidden goals from the very beginning?
It now depends on whether the nations wake up and people take their destiny and the fate of their country into their own hands again.
The peoples need to know these connections and plans behind the UN and its desired Agenda 2030. So spread this broadcast as widely as you can.
23.09.2023 | www.kla.tv/27058
If the thesis is that the UN helps to build up a “One-World-Government”, then the Rockefeller family and the UN would have to be connected. That means the total and ultimate control of all mankind is [...] wrapped up in nice words. And the whole thing is not a fantasy or a discussion, these are the goals decided by the UN. Back in June 2019, the World Economic Forum and the UN signed a strategic partnership agreement to accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. Various organizations are openly striving for world power for example through the UN. Germany, for example, is also actively working on the complete abolition of democracy. It now depends on whether the nations wake up and the people take their destiny and the fate of their country into their own hands again. From September 19 through Saturday, September 23, and Tuesday, September 26, 2023, the United Nations General Assembly will meet in New York. Heads of state and government will meet at UN headquarters, a total of 193 countries represented in the UN out of a total of 195 countries. Regarding the current General Assembly, the UN writes, among other things, that they want to reignite a feeling of hope, optimism and enthusiasm for the 2030 Agenda. But what does the 2030 Agenda include and what goals are pursued here? Before we address these questions, first a few words about the UN and its history. UN foundation and prehistory The predecessor of the United Nations or UN was the League of Nations, which was founded in 1920 after the First World War. Its official goal was “to promote international cooperation and to achieve peace as well as security.” On April 18, 1946, the League of Nations dissolved at its 21st Assembly. It was replaced by the founding of the United Nations. All of its assets were transferred to the new organization. The United Nations officially describes its founding as follows: “When World War II ended in 1945, nations lay in ruins and the world wanted peace. Representatives from 50 countries gathered at the United Nations Conference on an International Organization in San Francisco, California, from April 25 to June 26, 1945. For the next two months, they worked to draft and then sign the UN Charter, creating a new international organization, the United Nations, which, it was hoped, would prevent another world war like the one we had just experienced.” Securing world peace is still one of the most important tasks of the UN according to its charter. Is this true or is the UN being used to build a one-world government under this guise? A quote attributed to David Rockefeller raises questions in this regard. Speaking before the United Nations Economic Committee in 1994, he said: “We are on the verge of a global transformation, all we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” So, if the thesis is that the UN is helping to build a “One World Government,” the Rockefeller family and the UN must be linked. The UN and the Rockefeller family It is interesting to know that the Rockefeller Foundation made a decisive contribution to the organization of the world after World War II. It was the studies by the Council on Foreign Relations that were funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and ultimately led to the creation of the World Bank, NATO, and the UN, among others. John D. Rockefeller had already donated a library to the predecessor of the UN, the League of Nations. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon mentioned this in a speech in 2012: “I am honored to be here on this 85th anniversary of the historic donation of John D. Rockefeller Junior to the League of Nations Library. It is fitting that we are naming this room after him. I thank the family for donating the portrait of John D. Rockefeller that was displayed at the Rockefeller Foundation for 65 years. The Rockefeller family has lived up to this conviction, providing immense support for the League of Nations and the United Nations over the years.” John D. Rockefeller also donated the land, 7 hectares (equivalent to about the size of 10 soccer fields) on the east bank of Manhattan, where the cornerstone for the UN Headquarters in New York was laid on October 24, 1949. The Rockefeller Foundation together with the Rockefeller family had and still has a considerable influence on the creation and development of the UN. This is already shown by the connections to the last three UN Secretaries General: Kofi Annan was UN Secretary-General from 1997 to 2006. He is the recipient of the 2009 David Rockefeller Bridging Leadership Award. He was present at the presentation of David Rockefeller’s memoirs, and the statement from Rockefeller Foundation after his death was: “Kofi Annan was one of our longest and strongest partners.” António Guterres and Ban Ki-moon also appear to have a good connection to the Rockefeller family. Ban Ki-moon was UN Secretary-General from 2007 to 2016, and is seen here meeting with David Rockefeller. Ban Ki-moon gave an acceptance speech in 2012, as mentioned earlier, mentioning that the Rockefeller family has been immensely supportive of the United Nations over the years. António Guterres has been UN secretary-general since 2017. In the photos shown, he meets with Ariana Rockefeller and David Rockefeller Junior. Agenda 2030 Now back to the Agenda 2030 – what is behind it, or rather what goals is the UN pursuing with it? Kla-tv has already commented on Agenda 2030 in the program “Fraudulent labeling Agenda 2030 – the way the UN is dragging the world into the abyss”. (www.kla.tv/19141) How did the 2030 Agenda come about? It originally began with Agenda 21, a UN action program adopted in 1992 that contains concrete recommendations for action in development and environmental policy for the 21st century. With Agenda 2030 adopted by the UN in 2015, the goals of Agenda 21 were further developed and now apply equally to all countries. The current meeting now serves to review the implementation of the 2030 Agenda with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Has the implementation of Agenda 2030 so far shown at all that the UN wants to promote the world community? Or is its implementation gradually leading the world into the abyss or, in other words, into a one-world government? Investigative journalist Thomas Roeper comments on the 2030 Agenda in more details in his book “Inside Corona.” He writes: “The 2030 Agenda was adopted by the states of the UN and the fact that there is a separate catalog of measures in Germany for this already shows a central problem: Each state interprets the goals in its own way.” The following are key points of the 2030 Agenda that should be looked at in more detail. The 16th key point reads: “Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.” Sub-item 16.9 states: “By 2030, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration.” This point, i.e. the creation of a uniform legal or even digital identity for all the people of this world, is already in full swing with ID2020. ID2020 plans a transnational digital identity to complement state systems. All information about the individual should come together here: Education and vaccination certificates, financial status; accounts on Facebook, data produced by the smartphone. That means the total and ultimate control of the whole mankind is [...] packed in nice words. And the whole thing is not a fantasy or a discussion, these are goals decided by the UN, which are being worked on and billions are being spent on their implementation. ID2020 also shows the connection to the Rockefeller family. The Rockefeller Foundation is one of the central organizations behind ID2020. Funding of the 2030 Agenda According to its own information, the UN needs five to seven trillion dollars a year to finance the 2030 Agenda, that is $5,000 to $7,000 billion. By comparison, Germany’s annual gross national product is about $4,000 billion. By the way, the UN is financed by contributions from the member states. According to the UN, in order to provide these huge sums, it needs, among other things, to promote public-private partnerships, another goal of the 2030 Agenda! Public-private partnerships What does this mean when public-private partnerships are to be promoted? Thomas Roeper goes into detail about this in his book and writes: (p.46) "It is [...] about giving corporations more influence over the UN, or, to put it in geopolitical terms, it is about increasing the power of corporations at the expense of nation states. The corporations want to make the rules and no longer have to obey the laws of the nation-states. In the long run, they want to disempower nation-states (and especially their parliaments, which can pass 'disruptive' laws). To disguise this erosion of democracy, good-sounding terms like 'public-private partnership' are invented; it reassures the public." In addition to large corporations, the public-private partnership also aims at increasing the influence of oligarchs. Thomas Roeper understands oligarchs as people and organizations that “exercise power over a region” through their wealth, such as the Rockefeller Foundation or the World Economic Forum. Back in June 2019, the World Economic Forum and the UN signed a strategic partnership agreement to accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. Thus various organizations are openly seeking world power through, for example, the UN. This is by no means an exaggeration, according to Roeper. Germany, for example, is also actively working on the complete abolition of democracy, as stated in a document from the Federal Ministry of the Interior called the “Smart City Charter”. This was published in May 2017 and is available to Kla.TV. Under the heading “Vision of a hypernetworked planet”, it is written as point 6: Post-Voting Society: (society in which elections are no longer held) “Because we know exactly what people do and want, there is less need for elections, majority rule, or voting. Behavioral data can replace democracy as the society’s feedback system.” In the future, people should be digitally recorded and controlled so thoroughly that you can deduct from the data what the majority wants. A reason to no longer have to hold elections or to make decisions without elections. Furthermore, the Smart City concept writes about the Post-Ownership Society: (Society in which private property no longer exists) “Thanks to the information about available shared goods and resources, it makes less sense to own something: Perhaps private property will indeed become a luxury. Data could complement or replace money as a currency.” How on earth can such ideas be published openly? The abolition of democracy or private property would be against the law and should be punished. In fact, according to Thomas Roeper, it happens anyway. They have been working on it openly for years. In summary, it can be seen that the “UN Sustainable Development Goals” are really about a slow but steady increase in the power and influence of the UN because the states are being disempowered step by step. Democracy and ultimately, the nation states are gradually being abolished. Given the beginnings of the UN and the obvious influence of the Rockefeller Foundation, the question arises: Was the creation of a one-world government one of its hidden goals from the very beginning? It now depends on whether the nations wake up and people take their destiny and the fate of their country into their own hands again. The peoples need to know these connections and plans behind the UN and its desired Agenda 2030. So spread this broadcast as widely as you can.
from ch
https://www.un.org/en/conferences/SDGSummit2023
https://sdg.iisd.org/events/78th-session-of-the-un-general-assembly-unga-78/
UN https://www.un.org/en/about-us/history-of-the-un
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vereinte_Nationen
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/V%C3%B6lkerbund
https://www.studysmarter.de/schule/geschichte/erster-weltkrieg/voelkerbund/
UN and Rockefeller family https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_of_Thirty
Ticket: SE- https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2012-09-10/un-secretary-generals-remarks-united-nations-office-geneva-library
Rockefeller Family and UN Secretaries General https://www.synergos.org/news-and-insights/2009/university-night-2009
https://www.synergos.org/david-rockefeller-bridging-leadership-award
https://dam.media.un.org/archive/-2AM9LO5SE7IM.html
https://twitter.com/RockefellerFdn/status/1030860742373912578
https://dam.media.un.org/CS.aspx?VP3=DamView&VBID=2AM94S6P1SM5W&PN=1&WS=SearchResults&RW=1920&RH=969
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_participants
Quote David Rockefeller https://de.scribd.com/document/367694387/Zitate-Zur-Neuen-Weltordnung-Wahrheitsinside-wordpress-com#
http://alionstrail.com/2020/07/01/neue-weltordnung-zitate-und-positionen-bekannter-politiker/
Agenda 21 https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda_21
Agenda 2030 https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ziele_f%C3%BCr_nachhaltige_Entwicklung
Book: Inside Corona – Thomas Roeper, J.K.Fischer-Verlag https://www.j-k-fischer-verlag.de/J-K-Fischer-Verlag/INSIDE-CORONA--10647.html?MODsid=e9e30a709497ef170c0267d8cf8ab284
https://www.bmz.de/de/agenda-2030/sdg-16
https://www.2030agenda.de/sites/default/files/2030/zwischenbilanz/Agenda_2030_Zwischenbilanz_online-2.pdf
https://unric.org/de/17ziele/
ID2020 https://id2020.org/alliance#partners
https://www.srf.ch/kultur/gesellschaft-religion/digitale-identitaet-die-blockchain-weiss-alles-kommt-die-totale-ueberwachung
Funding of Agenda 2030 https://sphaera.world/billions-to-trillions/
https://www.eda.admin.ch/agenda2030/de/home/internationale-ebene/finanzierung-und-umsetzung.html
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vereinte_Nationen#Budget_und_Finanzierung
https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/1251/umfrage/entwicklung-des-bruttoinlandsprodukts-seit-dem-jahr-1991/
Public Private Partnerships https://www.eda.admin.ch/deza/de/home/partnerschaften/public-private-partnership.html
https://simonmercieca.com/2022/09/06/the-world-economic-forum-and-the-un-have-signed-an-agreement-in-order-to-accelerate-agenda-2030-why-the-hurry/
https://www.weforum.org/press/2019/06/world-economic-forum-and-un-sign-strategic-partnership-framework/
https://www.publiceye.ch/de/standpunkte/bluewashing-30-das-wef-hat-die-uno-gekapert-und-niemand-merkts
Smart City https://www.smart-city-dialog.de/
https://web.archive.org/web/20200607064428/https://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/veroeffentlichungen/themen/bauen/wohnen/smart-city-charta-langfassung.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=7
Smart City Charter concept of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (May 2017): Page 43, Post Voting Society; Post Ownership Society (on file with kla.tv).