Corona: Scaremongering by jumbling facts and figures?

05.10.2021 | www.kla.tv/20084

In mainstream media there is daily coverage saying that the number of people with Corona infection had increased, even skyrocketed. And that the number of deaths had reached a frightening level. The measures restricting public and private life were necessary to protect the health of many people. But what are these figures based on and how do they relate? Read below a little examination of these scary numbers: 1. Constantly increasing numbers of tests The global justification for all these restrictive measures is the allegedly ever-increasing number of infections. One speaks of infections but means the tests: The number of tests is increasing more and more, therefore positive results increase as well. However, many people who test positive show no symptoms, and various scientists, such as the Swiss Professor Beda Stadler, former director of the Institute of Immunology at the University of Bern, explain that people without symptoms cannot transmit the virus [see www.kla.tv/17056]. The fact that the results of the now increasingly performed Corona rapid tests have to be checked with a PCR test in case of a positive result also increases the number of tests. However, the PCR test was already described by its inventor, Dr. Kary Mullis, as unsuitable for diagnostic purposes [see www.kla.tv/17725]. In order to detect a virus, i.e., to achieve a positive test result, the test involves many duplication cycles - often more than 30 - of the existing gene sequences of the claimed virus. However, the more duplication cycles are performed, the more likely it is that there are no biologically intact viruses in the body of the person tested. The apparently positive test results obtained by the very large number of duplication cycles are moreover - up to approx. 80 % false positive according to a Chinese study, among others - [see www.kla.tv/17530 and www.kla.tv/17725]. 2. Confirmatory laboratory tests are missing In order to be able to say that a positive test result can be equated to an infection, the subsequent laboratory examination would have to supply evidence that an agent capable of replication (in this case the claimed virus) had been present and that Koch's four postulates were fulfilled. They demand, for instance, that the pathogen can be isolated from the diseased organism and is capable of infecting others [see www.kla.tv/16408]. This has not been proven so far. Answering an interpellation by member of parliament Marcel Luthe, the Berlin Senate Department of Health had to admit this, since it had confirmed in November 2020 that PCR tests are not capable of detecting an infection within the meaning of the Infection Protection Act. And WHO stated in January 2021 that the result of a PCR test must be confirmed by clinical examination [WHO Information Notice for IVD Users 2020/5, Jan. 13, 2021]. 3. Number of infections and test numbers without a correct reference value Politics and media always only give the figure/number of the persons who tested positive, the so-called 7-day incidence. This figure then stands for the number of “infected ones”. A meaningful value to which it relates to is not given. Instead of relating the test results - i.e., the sum of the daily test results per week - to the number of people tested, they are related to the number of inhabitants in a town or region. This value multiplied by 100,000 then yields the 7-day incidence, for example 50. This threatening, but misleading figure then is subsequently used by politicians at their will. In order to avoid restrictive measures, they demand, for example, that this 7-day incidence instead of 100 should better be 50 or 35, in some cases even 10. A meaningful statement/justification for this, however, remains untouched/is not given. By the way, the incidence value would seem much less threatening if one took 100 as multiplier according to normal percentage calculation. This would for example result in a percentage value of only 0.05 contrary to the example given before of 50. Nevertheless, this figure would also be incorrect, because it does not relate to the number of tested people. 4. Flu sick people now corona sick people? If you look at the official figures published by the Robert Koch Institute, you can see that the number of people with influenza has curiously fallen sharply compared with previous years, and that the people with influenza now appear to be accounted for as corona patients. This is also suggested by the fact that corona and influenza pathogens are similar, and the PCR test reacts to both. 5. Inaccurate information on causes and number of deaths It is often said that people had died from corona. In most cases, no distinction is made between those who died as a result of corona and those who died as a result of their previous, sometimes numerous illnesses. In the latter cases, corona was usually only the triggering factor. In fact, they died with Corona, not from it. The fear of Corona is also fueled by the fact that absolute death figures are published without mentioning the reference values, e.g., how many percent of the total population the number of deaths represents. According to information from the Robert Koch Institute, by mid-April 2021, nationwide 79,381 out of 3,073,442 so-called infected people had died from and with Corona. That is 2.58%. On average from 2016 to 2019, out of about 83,000,000 people 934,000 people died nationwide. That is about 1.13%. On average, 260,594 people died in the first quarters of 2016 to 2019, and almost the same number died in the average of the first quarters of 2020 and 2021, 260,777. Thus, as a result of Corona, there has been little change in overall mortality. With the help of all these dubious numbers, drastic lockdowns with devastating consequences have been justified - one wonders whether the scientists involved are no longer able of calculating? But the reason for this scaremongering by confusing numbers and facts is not a calculation error: In the first wave of the Corona pandemic in March 2020, the German Federal Ministry of the Interior commissioned the researchers of the Robert Koch Institute and other institutions to create a calculation model, on the basis of which "measures of a preventive and repressive [=suppressive, applying coercion] nature" could be planned. In this model a "worst case scenario" was recommended, according to which in Germany more than one million people might die from the corona virus, in case social life would be continued as before the pandemic! So it is not the case that politicians are taking advice from independent scientists, rather, Drosten, Wieler and Co. - as the extended arm of politics - seem to have become bought "contractors” put in charge to make the population willing to consent to questionable government measures by means of panic-spreading figures.

from fro./mol.

Sources/Links: Positive rapid tests are usually false https://www.focus.de/gesundheit/coronavirus/corona-infizierte-fruehzeitig-erkennen-statistikerin-positive-schnelltests-sind-meist-falsch-selbst-wenn-sie-medizin-personal-durchführt_id_13061305.html
Determination of the incidence value: https://rechneronline.de/anteil/inzidenzwert.php
https://www.stuttgarter-nachrichten.de/inhalt.7-tage-inzidenz-berechnen-mhsd.0e1d6354-1a00-40b3-b0ab-3a1a169882d8.html
PCR test is not validated - thus not a "gold standard": https://telegra.ph/Der-PCR-Test-ist-nicht-validiert-06-25
No scientific evidence of virus existence: https://telegra.ph/Alle-f%C3%BChrenden-Wissenschaftler-best%C3%A4tigen-COVID-19-existiert-nicht-07-03
Question by Marcel Luthe, Member of Parliament, to the Berlin Senate Department for Health https://reitschuster.de/post/berliner-regierung-weckt-zweifel-an-pcr-test/
https://reitschuster.de/post/berliner-regierung-weckt-zweifel-an-pcr-test/
Up to 80% false positive PCR tests: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32133832/
PCR test does not allow conclusions about infections or diseases: https://reitschuster.de/post/wie-der-pcr-test-nicht-funktioniert/
22 Reviewers: Drosten study contains ten serious scientific errors: https://reitschuster.de/post/wissenschaftler-pcr-test-unbrauchbar/
PCR test inventor testifies: Misuse is possible: https://www.wochenblick.at/nobelpreistraeger-und-erfinder-des-pcr-tests-missbrauch-moeglich/
WHO Information Sheet for Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) Methods Using the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) to Detect SARS-CoV-2, January 20, 2021, Medical Device Alert: https://dans-ai.ch/2021/02/09/who-informationsblatt-fuer-ivd-anwender-2020-05/
https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05
WHO: PCR test not suitable for detecting infection with "novel SARS CoV-2": https://sciencefiles.org/2021/01/21/breaking-fast-alles-gelogen-who-raumt-ein-dass-pcr-tests-asymptomatisch-erkrankte-nicht-feststellen-konnen/
https://www.achgut.com/artikel/who_beendet_epidemische_lage_von_nationaler_tragweite
PCR duplication rate (-Ct value) and viral load: https://www.doccheck.com/de/detail/articles/29845-coronatest-die-krux-mit-dem-ct-wert
What's behind the Corona policy: https://multipolar-magazin.de/artikel/was-steckt-hinter-der-corona-politik
On the question of whether Corona or flu: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7_3a8gXMo4
Special evaluation 2020/2021 of the Federal Statistical Office: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Sterbefaelle-Lebenserwartung/sterbefallzahlen.html
Population in Germany April 2021 https://countrymeters.info/de/Germany
Evaluations by the Robert Koch Institute: https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/478220a4c454480e823b17327b2bf1d4/page/page_1/
Dr. Lanka and his linked PDF article on virus detection: https://www.extremnews.com/berichte/weltgeschehen/45c117b9df9fc57
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrHnGBS8Eq4&feature=youtu.be
Koch's postulates: https://www.extremnews.com/berichte/gesundheit/b4c317bb235adce
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfXnjmfUh5M&feature=emb_logo
Federal Ministry of the Interior harnesses scientists for political purposes: https://www.welt.de/debatte/kommentare/article225908135/Corona-Massnahmen-Forscher-als-verlaengerter-Arm-der-Politik.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOD-cmUrdEg
Dr. Reiner Füllmich: The damage to us citizens is irreparable: https://vimeo.com/528720365