This website uses cookies. Cookies help us to provide our services. By using our services, you consent to our use of cookies. Your data is safe with us. We do not pass on your analysis or contact data to third parties! Further information can be found in the data protection declaration.
Subtitle "Afrikaans" was produced by machine.Subtitle "አማርኛ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "العربية " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Ārāmāyâ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "azərbaycan dili " was produced by machine.Subtitle "беларуская мова " was produced by machine.Подзаглавието "България" е създадено от машина.Subtitle "বাংলা " was produced by machine.Subtitle "བོད་ཡིག" was produced by machine.Subtitle "босански" was produced by machine.Subtitle "català" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Cebuano" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ગુજરાતી" was produced by machine.Subtitle "corsu" was produced by machine.Podtitul "Čeština" byl vytvořen automaticky.Subtitle "Cymraeg" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Dansk" was produced by machine.Untertitel "Deutsch" wurde maschinell erzeugt.Subtitle "Untertitel" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Ελληνικά" was produced by machine.Subtitle "English" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Esperanto" was produced by machine.El subtítulo "Español" se generó automáticamente.Subtitle "Eesti" was produced by machine.Subtitle "euskara" was produced by machine.Subtitle "فارسی" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Suomi" was produced by machine.Le sous-titre "Français" a été généré automatiquement.Subtitle "Frysk" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Gaeilge" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Gàidhlig" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Galego" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Schwizerdütsch" was produced by machine.Subtitle "هَوُسَ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Ōlelo Hawaiʻi" was produced by machine.Subtitle "עברית" was produced by machine.Subtitle "हिन्दी" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Mẹo" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Hrvatski" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Kreyòl ayisyen " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Magyar" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Հայերեն" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Bahasa Indonesia " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Asụsụ Igbo " was produced by machine.Textun"Íslenska" var framkvæmt vélrænt.Sottotitoli "Italiano" sono stati generati automaticamente.字幕は"日本語" 自動的に生成されました。Subtitle "Basa Jawa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ქართული" was produced by machine.Subtitle "қазақ тілі " was produced by machine.Subtitle "ភាសាខ្មែរ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ಕನ್ನಡ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "한국어" was produced by machine.Subtitle "कोंकणी語" was produced by machine.Subtitle "کوردی" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Кыргызча" was produced by machine.Subtitle " lingua latina" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Lëtzebuergesch" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Lingala" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ພາສາ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Lietuvių" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Latviešu" was produced by machine.Subtitle "fiteny malagasy" was produced by machine.Subtitle "te reo Māori" was produced by machine.Subtitle "македонски јазик" was produced by machine.Subtitle "malayāḷaṁ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "မြန်မာစာ " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Монгол хэл" was produced by machine.Subtitle "मराठी" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Bahasa Malaysia" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Malti" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ဗမာစာ " was produced by machine.Subtitle "नेपाली" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Nederlands" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Norsk" was produced by machine.Subtitle "chiCheŵa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ਪੰਜਾਬੀ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Polska" was produced by machine.Subtitle "پښتو" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Português" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Română" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Язык жестов (Русский)" was produced by machine.Субтитры "Pусский" были созданы машиной.Subtitle "Kinyarwanda" was produced by machine.Subtitle "सिन्धी" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Deutschschweizer Gebärdensprache" was produced by machine.Subtitle "සිංහල" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Slovensky" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Slovenski" was produced by machine.Subtitle "gagana fa'a Samoa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "chiShona" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Soomaaliga" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Shqip" was produced by machine.Subtitle "србски" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Sesotho" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Basa Sunda" was produced by machine.Undertext "Svenska" är maskinell skapad.Subtitle "Kiswahili" was produced by machine.Subtitle "தமிழ்" was produced by machine.Subtitle "తెలుగు" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Тоҷикй" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ภาษาไทย" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ትግርኛ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Tagalog" ay nabuo sa pamamagitan ng makina.
Subtitle "Türkçe" was produced by machine.Subtitle "татар теле" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Українська " was produced by machine.Subtitle "اردو" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Oʻzbek" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Tiếng Việt" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Serbšćina" was produced by machine.Subtitle "isiXhosa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ייִדיש" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Yorùbá" was produced by machine.Subtitle "中文" was produced by machine.Subtitle "isiZulu" was produced by machine.
kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV не носи отговорност за некачествен превод.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV nenese žádnou odpovědnost za chybné překlady.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV übernimmt keine Haftung für mangelhafte Übersetzung.kla.TV accepts no liability for inadequate translationkla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV no se hace responsable de traducciones incorrectas.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV n'assume aucune responsabilité en cas de mauvaise traduction.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV nem vállal felelősséget a hibás fordításértkla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV tekur enga ábyrgð á áræðanleika þýðingarinnarKla.TV non si assume alcuna responsabilità per traduzioni lacunose e/o errate.Kla.TV は、不適切な翻訳に対して一切の責任を負いません。kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV не несет ответственности за некачественный перевод.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.Kla.TV tar inget ansvar för felaktiga översättningar.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla. Walang pananagutan ang TV sa mga depektibong pagsasalin.
kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.
EU: Take our Injections, Accept our Surveillance – Or You Face… - Interview with Meike Terhorst
We had the unique chance to interview Dutch lawyer Meike Terhorst. Watch our chat about the pilot-project on vaccine passports in the EU and other crucial topics.
[continue reading]
Daniel: Hello, Meike. It's wonderful to have you back here on Kla.TV.
Could you please briefly introduce who you are, what motivates you, what are you doing?
Meike: Yes. Well, thanks for having me. My name is Meike Terhorst. I'm an attorney at law in Alkmaar, the Netherlands. I've been a lawyer for 31 years. I started in a corporate law firm and then I started to become a legal aid lawyer in Amsterdam and later in Alkmaar. And I work for psychiatrist patients and in the field of child protection just for children and for young people. I'm also a children's lawyer, so to speak. But I also have some experience in the field of the environment. I worked for the Dutch version of Friends of the Earth called Milieudefensie. And yeah, to kind of all kinds of - against pesticides and all kinds of things.
D: Wow. That's a great variety of things that you're doing. Yeah. We met first in Geneva on the 1st of June when the International Health Regulations were... the amendments were adopted in the WHO. And after that, you told me that some Dutch senators wrote a letter to Dr. Tedros about these proceedings. Can you give us a brief insight what that was about?
M: Yes, it's about four senators. So, we have the parliament and then above that, we have the Dutch Senate. And four members of the Dutch Senate signed a letter that the amendments to the international health regulations are invalid, because the Dutch constitution does not allow a transfer of powers from the national level to the WHO. And also from the point of view of the WHO, the WHO constitution provides that the WHO can only give advice on health issues and therefore it cannot be a real power. The member states are responsible for health issues within their own territory. So what’s now happening with the International Health Regulations? Is that the WHO is acting outside its own constitution and this is completely invalid. It's quite strange that everybody is so afraid of this power grab at the WHO level. But we are afraid of something which is legally invalid. And this was confirmed in the letter of by the four senators. And the letter is addressed to Dr. Tedros. And when I was in Geneva, I was also with a former Member of Parliament, called Wybren van Haga, and also Jim Ferguson and we went to the WHO building to hand over the letter to Dr. Tedros but he wasn't there. First, we went to the WHO building, then we were told he was at the UN but there we could not get to speak to him. Then we went back, and in the end, I emailed the letter to his email address. We emailed it.
D: So, I mean this brings this term “unconstitutional” to a whole new level, right? And speaking about all these proceedings with the WHO; it seems that they have already a lot of power right now, when they just proclaim a pandemic, and then suddenly the whole world goes into lockdown, right? Because national laws kick in, and everybody is kind of – it seems that the people in power in the different countries are - in many countries at least - are on board too, with this whole agenda. And now, you sent me something new that's going on in the European Union, called the European vaccination card. What is going on there? There's a pilot project you wrote me, what is happening here?
Well, also at the WHO: the articles of the International Health Regulations’ amendments were to increase the power of WHO, and WHO is working together with the EU. They are like, linked into each other. Together they want to start a network for vaccination passports. So the WHO, they use the infrastructure, the technical infrastructure that has been developed during COVID 19 in the EU, it's the digital COVID certificate. So, at the moment now we have a pilot (test) in five EU countries, to start with this digital passport. Well. On the website it's called “Eurovalbeco”
which means vaccination passport beyond COVID, European vaccination beyond COVID. And this program is to make a link between the person in those countries, and their vaccination details, so that they're all stored in one place. And it can be in the form of a normal card, like a driver's license, with a chip in it. And on the chip is the information. Or it can also be in an app form on your telephone. And basically, it's the same as the QR code, which was used during COVID-19. It's the same thing. And the important part is that the EU and WHO are working together. And it's called the Global Digital Network. And this network is connected to 80 countries. So this project is really about all the countries that are part of this project. So, you see that it's a global enterprise to get all the people in those countries hooked up to this new technology and this new kind of service.
D: So what do you think will happen with people whose digital footprint shows that they have a mindset that isn't very vaccination-friendly? I mean, we saw what happened with them during COVID. What do you think could be the result of this push now – now it's just a pilot project; you know, now it's just, it's a benefit for those who have their vaccinations all up to date. They can move easily all around Europe and get free passes everywhere. But what is the ultimate implication of that, in your opinion?
Well, during the Bali summit. It was the G20. the G20 summit in Bali it was clearly stated that the passport is to enable travelling for people who are vaccinated and are completely up to date. So basically what the passport is for is kind of to stop people from travelling who are not vaccinated. And of course, it's not just about vaccination, it's also about banking, because the project now is to make the link between the person and the vaccination details. But at the UN - today, the summit is going on - It's also about the link between the ID and the bank account and the bank details. So basically the digital ID is the central point to which all kinds of technology and information is linked, and that is banking, that is medical, but also maybe insurance and all kinds of other things. And it's all linked to the digital infrastructure which is set up. And in the Netherlands, you also see that the whole banking is getting digitalized. So everything is online but. But also, you don't get any written bank statements any more, unless you request or pay for it. So, they want to make everything digital and that you can only access your own information through certain access codes So if you don't have an access code, you cannot see how much pension you have for example. Or you cannot apply for anything from the government because you also need this digital infrastructure, and it's called a “trust structure”. So, it's supposedly there to prevent crimes on the internet and that you can verify that you're really that person. But of course, it's much more than just for safety reasons. It's for control of us.
D: And during the COVID era, we noticed very much of that, right. When also the media or the whole narrative was was pushed in this direction that people who didn't willingly take that experimental vaccine and, we know, they were not only locked down and excluded, but they were also even quite attacked, right, verbally, at least. How was that in the Netherlands?
M: Yeah, well, in the Netherlands, it was very bad because people lost their jobs, sometimes. As a schoolteacher or as a professor at the university or somebody who gives lectures. So, it was a very heated debate, so to speak. And the people who spoke out, they were smeared, also doctors. There was a woman in the parliament – a parliament member who said that she wanted all the doctors who spoke out against the vaccines to be removed from their registry as a doctor. And of course, that was immensely threatening that you stand to lose your job just by speaking out. And this is how coercion starts, of course. If you are not allowed to say something, very quickly it also becomes clear that you're not allowed to think something any more. So it's this kind of – this is denying a person to be free. And also, we know now that many things the government told us were not true. So for instance, the whole reason for the vaccine passports was implying that we needed to be vaccinated to protect somebody else. And but then it turned out that Pfizer admitted in the European Parliament - and Rob Rose, a Dutch parliamentarian from in the European Parliament, he asked Janine Smalls of Pfizer during the public hearing whether they knew whether or not the vaccine would stop transmission. And then Janine Smalls said: no, we don't know this. So basically, they forced everybody to get vaccinated and there was no proof whatsoever that it would stop transmission. So basically, we were told a lie. And that anybody who tried to expose this lie was shut down or smeared or lost their jobs or or or …, maybe worse, I don't know. It was very intense.
D: Yeah. And you you told me something else, another aspect which I briefly want to touch on with you. That's what I learned from you from a legal point: that is that after World War Two, mind control was forbidden. But now the European Union, in conjunction with whoever is doing this vaccination ID thing, is is bringing it up again. It is actually in their plan written down. Can you tell us what is going on there?
M: Yes. Well, it is in the roadmap to the digital vaccination passports. It's a program you can find on the Internet. It was a program started already in 2018. And the European Commission started this project. The European Commission has lawmaking powers and they - so they could single- handedly start this project. So already in 2018, this road was laid out that we would have to go to a digital vaccination passport. And number one, the EU is not a country, so they are not authorized to issue a passport. (number 2:) Vaccination is obligatory, according to this political plan. And number three, they have mind control as part of this project, so they can appoint funds to have mind control. And there was a lot of mind control during COVID 19. There was this immense fear, that came with it; with all these presentations during eight o' clock, you have...
D:...the newest numbers. These are the numbers of the day. These are the hotspots. And here's a super spreader event going on. The media repeating all of that constantly and government and all institutions, you know.
M: Yeah. Yeah. And also like the way it was presented to us also with these gestures for for deaf people, it was very much, yeah, in conformity with mind control principles, like repeating, like you say, repeating the same message. And also not allowing opposing views in the media.
D: Right. They were all excluded. None of them got invited; none of the experts, the professors, the people with great credentials who are, you know, not going along conform - in line. Yeah. Nobody got a voice.
M: No. And in the Netherlands, we found out why. Because we had a think tank disinformation and we found out through researched public documents that there was a group of 35 people, which include also Marion Koopmans, who is a very important person if you want to know more about the whole pandemic and everything that happened. And so this group was basically granted money to make sure that everybody got vaccinated. And in this group were also journalists who were working for newspaper and within their own work, they had to look for who would have an opposing view. So really right in the beginning we had them stopping any opposing view. We had also publications that were edited right away, like censored. And it was also even that the public was kind of encouraged to speak badly about people who were not supporting the official narrative - who were speaking out against it. They were smeared and it's called “Voppie”, of course, like in every language, they are “Querdenker” in German. But anyway. but also...
D: “Voppies” in the Netherlands.
M: Yes, But this was very strange. And this is felt also very strange that I was immediately kind of triggered that I felt like well this is very strange what's happening. And I was asking questions in groups of people and then people wrote back to me, saying: oh you act a bit like a Querdenker, like an anti vaxxer, why are you asking these questions, why don't you just help us to come out of the pandemic, and are you not going along with the official narrative? And I had no intention to go against the narrative, I was just curious. I thought it was so awkward what was happening, and things were happening that didn't add up. So from the first moment I thought something is wrong here, something is not right. So...
D: And this kind of mind control is also within this whole map that the European Union already laid out.
M: Yes, yes. So already in 2018 this whole plan to have a digital vaccination card was laid out and everything is going according to plan, so basically maybe a little bit later than planned but basically it's all happening. And also part of this plan is to oppose disinformation, which means anything or anybody that goes against the narrative needs to be shut down. And there is public money allocated to this purpose. Well at the moment we have the summit for the future happening at the UN level. There is now the “pact for the future” going to be signed, probably, because they want to also use a silent procedure for it, meaning that there is no vote. As a lawyer I think like how can you agree on something without a vote? It doesn't make any sense, and it makes it very clear that there is no sense to the whole process, it's just coercion of a certain group. Anyway, in this plan is also a paragraph to shut down disinformation, so it is not only at the EU level that it has become official to attack any opposing view. It's also at the UN level. So also at the UN level you have a digital ID which is then connected to your bank details, probably also to the vaccination details. And with this ID it's very easy to do what the Chinese government is doing, to censor anybody because you can then prohibit that person to travel for instance: when you have been speaking out against something then you cannot go anywhere. And I think this is very important to realize, it's not that a person will stop you from travelling. No, it's the artificial intelligence that will stop you from travelling. When you are at the railroad station you will not get access to the trains because you will not have a green light to go through a gate. And this is how it will work, it will all be automatically working, which means that it's very hard to do anything against it because there is nobody to talk to.
D: Wow. So we are at a decisive point in history, I would say, where we have to choose, do we let the dissenting voices be mowed down and big international...the power be transferred up? What would your message as a lawyer be to the viewer? What should we do today? What do we need to focus on? What do we need to understand? Or what should we do in these days? What's important?
M: Well, number one is it all starts with you. So basically, anybody that I talk to will always say something like: yeah, but there is nothing we can do against it. But that's not true! Because if it were true, then they would not need so much force to stop the people. So it's very obvious that they are afraid of us. And I think it's important to start to allow yourself to feel angry about what's happening because in our society, anger is no longer allowed. We have to be - the tone of voice needs to be very nice etc. Everybody is made to behave but not to feel. You need to feel what you’re really feeling and then start to act because then you are connected to energy, and I think it’s also important to keep the faith in yourself and (for) other people that the good is always stronger than the bad.
We always lived with this problem and hopefully, if we work together, we can avoid a situation where everybody is under the thumb of the people who want keep us down. And I think that one so important and that is to stand up for other people. If we start to help people who speak up and are brave, then it becomes very difficult to stop this. And that’s why I also say please help Rainer Fuellmich to get out of prison. He's a lawyer who maybe has done more than any other person that i know to stop what's happening now: this big threat that we're under, like the the passport, but also much more, the personal - say that everybody has to or will be be vaccinated by force. Reiner Fuellmich has done a tremendous job and he's now in prison already, I believe for a year or so, a very long time. He needs to be freed. So I hope everybody who hears this message will get together and get him out of prison because this will be our victory for the truth, but also for Reiner. That somebody who stands up for what he believes in will not be a victim of that and left alone in his battle.
D: Great. Thank you Meike for this message. Thank you also for giving us this interview. It was great. Thanks!
15.10.2024 | www.kla.tv/30785
Daniel: Hello, Meike. It's wonderful to have you back here on Kla.TV. Could you please briefly introduce who you are, what motivates you, what are you doing? Meike: Yes. Well, thanks for having me. My name is Meike Terhorst. I'm an attorney at law in Alkmaar, the Netherlands. I've been a lawyer for 31 years. I started in a corporate law firm and then I started to become a legal aid lawyer in Amsterdam and later in Alkmaar. And I work for psychiatrist patients and in the field of child protection just for children and for young people. I'm also a children's lawyer, so to speak. But I also have some experience in the field of the environment. I worked for the Dutch version of Friends of the Earth called Milieudefensie. And yeah, to kind of all kinds of - against pesticides and all kinds of things. D: Wow. That's a great variety of things that you're doing. Yeah. We met first in Geneva on the 1st of June when the International Health Regulations were... the amendments were adopted in the WHO. And after that, you told me that some Dutch senators wrote a letter to Dr. Tedros about these proceedings. Can you give us a brief insight what that was about? M: Yes, it's about four senators. So, we have the parliament and then above that, we have the Dutch Senate. And four members of the Dutch Senate signed a letter that the amendments to the international health regulations are invalid, because the Dutch constitution does not allow a transfer of powers from the national level to the WHO. And also from the point of view of the WHO, the WHO constitution provides that the WHO can only give advice on health issues and therefore it cannot be a real power. The member states are responsible for health issues within their own territory. So what’s now happening with the International Health Regulations? Is that the WHO is acting outside its own constitution and this is completely invalid. It's quite strange that everybody is so afraid of this power grab at the WHO level. But we are afraid of something which is legally invalid. And this was confirmed in the letter of by the four senators. And the letter is addressed to Dr. Tedros. And when I was in Geneva, I was also with a former Member of Parliament, called Wybren van Haga, and also Jim Ferguson and we went to the WHO building to hand over the letter to Dr. Tedros but he wasn't there. First, we went to the WHO building, then we were told he was at the UN but there we could not get to speak to him. Then we went back, and in the end, I emailed the letter to his email address. We emailed it. D: So, I mean this brings this term “unconstitutional” to a whole new level, right? And speaking about all these proceedings with the WHO; it seems that they have already a lot of power right now, when they just proclaim a pandemic, and then suddenly the whole world goes into lockdown, right? Because national laws kick in, and everybody is kind of – it seems that the people in power in the different countries are - in many countries at least - are on board too, with this whole agenda. And now, you sent me something new that's going on in the European Union, called the European vaccination card. What is going on there? There's a pilot project you wrote me, what is happening here? Well, also at the WHO: the articles of the International Health Regulations’ amendments were to increase the power of WHO, and WHO is working together with the EU. They are like, linked into each other. Together they want to start a network for vaccination passports. So the WHO, they use the infrastructure, the technical infrastructure that has been developed during COVID 19 in the EU, it's the digital COVID certificate. So, at the moment now we have a pilot (test) in five EU countries, to start with this digital passport. Well. On the website it's called “Eurovalbeco” which means vaccination passport beyond COVID, European vaccination beyond COVID. And this program is to make a link between the person in those countries, and their vaccination details, so that they're all stored in one place. And it can be in the form of a normal card, like a driver's license, with a chip in it. And on the chip is the information. Or it can also be in an app form on your telephone. And basically, it's the same as the QR code, which was used during COVID-19. It's the same thing. And the important part is that the EU and WHO are working together. And it's called the Global Digital Network. And this network is connected to 80 countries. So this project is really about all the countries that are part of this project. So, you see that it's a global enterprise to get all the people in those countries hooked up to this new technology and this new kind of service. D: So what do you think will happen with people whose digital footprint shows that they have a mindset that isn't very vaccination-friendly? I mean, we saw what happened with them during COVID. What do you think could be the result of this push now – now it's just a pilot project; you know, now it's just, it's a benefit for those who have their vaccinations all up to date. They can move easily all around Europe and get free passes everywhere. But what is the ultimate implication of that, in your opinion? Well, during the Bali summit. It was the G20. the G20 summit in Bali it was clearly stated that the passport is to enable travelling for people who are vaccinated and are completely up to date. So basically what the passport is for is kind of to stop people from travelling who are not vaccinated. And of course, it's not just about vaccination, it's also about banking, because the project now is to make the link between the person and the vaccination details. But at the UN - today, the summit is going on - It's also about the link between the ID and the bank account and the bank details. So basically the digital ID is the central point to which all kinds of technology and information is linked, and that is banking, that is medical, but also maybe insurance and all kinds of other things. And it's all linked to the digital infrastructure which is set up. And in the Netherlands, you also see that the whole banking is getting digitalized. So everything is online but. But also, you don't get any written bank statements any more, unless you request or pay for it. So, they want to make everything digital and that you can only access your own information through certain access codes So if you don't have an access code, you cannot see how much pension you have for example. Or you cannot apply for anything from the government because you also need this digital infrastructure, and it's called a “trust structure”. So, it's supposedly there to prevent crimes on the internet and that you can verify that you're really that person. But of course, it's much more than just for safety reasons. It's for control of us. D: And during the COVID era, we noticed very much of that, right. When also the media or the whole narrative was was pushed in this direction that people who didn't willingly take that experimental vaccine and, we know, they were not only locked down and excluded, but they were also even quite attacked, right, verbally, at least. How was that in the Netherlands? M: Yeah, well, in the Netherlands, it was very bad because people lost their jobs, sometimes. As a schoolteacher or as a professor at the university or somebody who gives lectures. So, it was a very heated debate, so to speak. And the people who spoke out, they were smeared, also doctors. There was a woman in the parliament – a parliament member who said that she wanted all the doctors who spoke out against the vaccines to be removed from their registry as a doctor. And of course, that was immensely threatening that you stand to lose your job just by speaking out. And this is how coercion starts, of course. If you are not allowed to say something, very quickly it also becomes clear that you're not allowed to think something any more. So it's this kind of – this is denying a person to be free. And also, we know now that many things the government told us were not true. So for instance, the whole reason for the vaccine passports was implying that we needed to be vaccinated to protect somebody else. And but then it turned out that Pfizer admitted in the European Parliament - and Rob Rose, a Dutch parliamentarian from in the European Parliament, he asked Janine Smalls of Pfizer during the public hearing whether they knew whether or not the vaccine would stop transmission. And then Janine Smalls said: no, we don't know this. So basically, they forced everybody to get vaccinated and there was no proof whatsoever that it would stop transmission. So basically, we were told a lie. And that anybody who tried to expose this lie was shut down or smeared or lost their jobs or or or …, maybe worse, I don't know. It was very intense. D: Yeah. And you you told me something else, another aspect which I briefly want to touch on with you. That's what I learned from you from a legal point: that is that after World War Two, mind control was forbidden. But now the European Union, in conjunction with whoever is doing this vaccination ID thing, is is bringing it up again. It is actually in their plan written down. Can you tell us what is going on there? M: Yes. Well, it is in the roadmap to the digital vaccination passports. It's a program you can find on the Internet. It was a program started already in 2018. And the European Commission started this project. The European Commission has lawmaking powers and they - so they could single- handedly start this project. So already in 2018, this road was laid out that we would have to go to a digital vaccination passport. And number one, the EU is not a country, so they are not authorized to issue a passport. (number 2:) Vaccination is obligatory, according to this political plan. And number three, they have mind control as part of this project, so they can appoint funds to have mind control. And there was a lot of mind control during COVID 19. There was this immense fear, that came with it; with all these presentations during eight o' clock, you have... D:...the newest numbers. These are the numbers of the day. These are the hotspots. And here's a super spreader event going on. The media repeating all of that constantly and government and all institutions, you know. M: Yeah. Yeah. And also like the way it was presented to us also with these gestures for for deaf people, it was very much, yeah, in conformity with mind control principles, like repeating, like you say, repeating the same message. And also not allowing opposing views in the media. D: Right. They were all excluded. None of them got invited; none of the experts, the professors, the people with great credentials who are, you know, not going along conform - in line. Yeah. Nobody got a voice. M: No. And in the Netherlands, we found out why. Because we had a think tank disinformation and we found out through researched public documents that there was a group of 35 people, which include also Marion Koopmans, who is a very important person if you want to know more about the whole pandemic and everything that happened. And so this group was basically granted money to make sure that everybody got vaccinated. And in this group were also journalists who were working for newspaper and within their own work, they had to look for who would have an opposing view. So really right in the beginning we had them stopping any opposing view. We had also publications that were edited right away, like censored. And it was also even that the public was kind of encouraged to speak badly about people who were not supporting the official narrative - who were speaking out against it. They were smeared and it's called “Voppie”, of course, like in every language, they are “Querdenker” in German. But anyway. but also... D: “Voppies” in the Netherlands. M: Yes, But this was very strange. And this is felt also very strange that I was immediately kind of triggered that I felt like well this is very strange what's happening. And I was asking questions in groups of people and then people wrote back to me, saying: oh you act a bit like a Querdenker, like an anti vaxxer, why are you asking these questions, why don't you just help us to come out of the pandemic, and are you not going along with the official narrative? And I had no intention to go against the narrative, I was just curious. I thought it was so awkward what was happening, and things were happening that didn't add up. So from the first moment I thought something is wrong here, something is not right. So... D: And this kind of mind control is also within this whole map that the European Union already laid out. M: Yes, yes. So already in 2018 this whole plan to have a digital vaccination card was laid out and everything is going according to plan, so basically maybe a little bit later than planned but basically it's all happening. And also part of this plan is to oppose disinformation, which means anything or anybody that goes against the narrative needs to be shut down. And there is public money allocated to this purpose. Well at the moment we have the summit for the future happening at the UN level. There is now the “pact for the future” going to be signed, probably, because they want to also use a silent procedure for it, meaning that there is no vote. As a lawyer I think like how can you agree on something without a vote? It doesn't make any sense, and it makes it very clear that there is no sense to the whole process, it's just coercion of a certain group. Anyway, in this plan is also a paragraph to shut down disinformation, so it is not only at the EU level that it has become official to attack any opposing view. It's also at the UN level. So also at the UN level you have a digital ID which is then connected to your bank details, probably also to the vaccination details. And with this ID it's very easy to do what the Chinese government is doing, to censor anybody because you can then prohibit that person to travel for instance: when you have been speaking out against something then you cannot go anywhere. And I think this is very important to realize, it's not that a person will stop you from travelling. No, it's the artificial intelligence that will stop you from travelling. When you are at the railroad station you will not get access to the trains because you will not have a green light to go through a gate. And this is how it will work, it will all be automatically working, which means that it's very hard to do anything against it because there is nobody to talk to. D: Wow. So we are at a decisive point in history, I would say, where we have to choose, do we let the dissenting voices be mowed down and big international...the power be transferred up? What would your message as a lawyer be to the viewer? What should we do today? What do we need to focus on? What do we need to understand? Or what should we do in these days? What's important? M: Well, number one is it all starts with you. So basically, anybody that I talk to will always say something like: yeah, but there is nothing we can do against it. But that's not true! Because if it were true, then they would not need so much force to stop the people. So it's very obvious that they are afraid of us. And I think it's important to start to allow yourself to feel angry about what's happening because in our society, anger is no longer allowed. We have to be - the tone of voice needs to be very nice etc. Everybody is made to behave but not to feel. You need to feel what you’re really feeling and then start to act because then you are connected to energy, and I think it’s also important to keep the faith in yourself and (for) other people that the good is always stronger than the bad. We always lived with this problem and hopefully, if we work together, we can avoid a situation where everybody is under the thumb of the people who want keep us down. And I think that one so important and that is to stand up for other people. If we start to help people who speak up and are brave, then it becomes very difficult to stop this. And that’s why I also say please help Rainer Fuellmich to get out of prison. He's a lawyer who maybe has done more than any other person that i know to stop what's happening now: this big threat that we're under, like the the passport, but also much more, the personal - say that everybody has to or will be be vaccinated by force. Reiner Fuellmich has done a tremendous job and he's now in prison already, I believe for a year or so, a very long time. He needs to be freed. So I hope everybody who hears this message will get together and get him out of prison because this will be our victory for the truth, but also for Reiner. That somebody who stands up for what he believes in will not be a victim of that and left alone in his battle. D: Great. Thank you Meike for this message. Thank you also for giving us this interview. It was great. Thanks!
from -
https://health.ec.europa.eu/document/download/0f3d8ec0-82f3-41c9-b76b-aa7478f796d3_en?filename=2019-2022_roadmap_en.pdf