RKI protocols reveal child-hostile pandemic policy!

15.10.2024 | www.kla.tv/30761

At a press conference in Berlin on July 23, 2024, journalist Aya Velazquez, financial expert Stefan Homburg and journalist Bastian Barucker presented around 1,500 new pages of the RKI's [Robert Koch Institute - the German federal government's leading research institute], which had been released and not redacted. It came to light how much politics could influence the RKI's decision-making processes. A scandal! Today, based on our program "The hybrid war against our children" (kla.tv 30526), ​​we want to summarize the contribution by journalist Bastian Barucker. His focus in disclosing the protocols was specifically on the children and their unjustifiable suffering during the Corona period. He begins his speech with a brief outline of the measures taken: Germany had the longest school closures in Europe, compulsory mask-wearing for hours over months, sometimes outdoors and even in physical education classes, regular, random testing of healthy children, closure of playgrounds, the requirement to keep a distance that was completely contrary to children's sensibilities, the promotion of a new and little-tested "vaccination". Not to forget the strategy developed by the Ministry of the Interior to deliberately frighten children and suggest that they are to blame for the death of their parents if they do not follow the hygiene rules. The damage caused is far-reaching, sometimes irreversible and enormous. It will keep us busy for decades, says Barucker. But one thing is certain: there was no health crisis! Children were never at risk from any virus! Nevertheless, they in particular had to suffer from the measures that were based on political pressure and not on scientific findings. Barucker quotes Health Minister Karl Lauterbach: "Children and young people have made the greatest sacrifices in the course of pandemic policy!" and Family Minister Lisa Paus: "73% of children and young people are psychologically stressed due to the measures and NOT due to a virus!" What a late insight, especially since federal law states that the welfare of children must be given priority in all political decisions! But to what extent have the RKI and politicians taken this principle into account in their decisions? Barucker examines this question with quotes that come primarily from the RKI protocols, according to the following key points: School closures measure March 2020: It's about school closures. The RKI states the following: "Reactive school closures in areas that are not particularly affected are not recommended." In April 2020, it also states: "School closures probably did not have a major impact on controlling the epidemic." Christian Drosten [German virologist and scientific advisor to the German federal and state governments], on the other hand, said on March 12, 2020: "No more events and closing schools - that is something we have to do now." Mask-wearing measure November 2020, the RKI protocols state: "It is unfavorable and dangerous when masks are used by laypeople! It is not really possible to exert influence." The RKI was not consulted in advance. However, the mask requirements were introduced anyway and, as was to be expected, had no medical effectiveness, but did have significant side effects, especially in children and young people. When the topic of FFP2 masks came up, the RKI protocol from January 2021 states: "So far there is no convincing evidence that FFP2 is better, especially not for children." A general FFP2 mask requirement was not considered sensible from a technical point of view. In October 2022, however, an FFP2 mask requirement was introduced on public transport for children aged 6 to 13. In general, it was already stated in autumn 2020: "The success of measures cannot be satisfactorily answered with RKI data. We know which factors drive up the incidences and know sensible measures, but we will not be able to prove this with RKI data!" An unbelievable statement! Measure vaccinations Barucker says the following: "Since Corona did not pose a significant danger to children, there was never a medical reason for a conditionally approved and experimental vaccination, which, as was clear from the beginning, only offered self-protection, if at all." What does the protocol say about this? May 2021: "Pediatric professional associations are cautious about vaccinating children. Politicians are already preparing vaccination campaigns so that the corresponding age groups are vaccinated by the end of the holidays." In August 2021, the protocols state that the STIKO [Standing Vaccination Commission] still does not rate the benefit of a vaccination higher than the risk posed by the disease. But on August 16, 2021, the vaccination recommendation for all 12 to 17 year olds will come!!! The RKI also recognizes this and is looking for explanations to justify vaccinating childrento justify it. Suddenly they change course and try to show what "long-term effects" it can have on children. On July 30, 2021, there is talk of changing the vaccination target. There was no valid data base then and there is no valid data basis today that shows that SARS-CoV-2 infections lead to particular long-term consequences in children. The STIKO chairman himself said: "There is no such thing as long COVID in children."!!! Media work measure In July 2021, younger people in particular were encouraged to get "vaccinated" or boosted, e.g. "Influenza Vaccination Challenge" on YouTube: "It must be cool to get vaccinated." There are also other indications of political influence, says Barucker. Further from the RKI files: "At the moment, a booster vaccination of children is also being considered from a ministerial point of view, although there is no recommendation and in some cases no approval." Regarding the monitoring of the safety of the previously advertised "vaccines", it says in January 2023: "The monthly report and vaccination dashboard [the vaccination dashboard showed on a daily basis how many people in Germany had received a corona vaccination] will be discontinued in May. Assessment of vaccination side effects will no longer be possible. This must be accompanied by very good communication so that it does not fall back on the RKI."!!! Conclusion Bastian Barucker's conclusion was: "In principle, these medical facts are not new. Doctors and internationally highly respected scientists pointed out early on - but mostly in vain - that the measures posed a greater danger to children than the virus. The RKI also knew this. An unbiased look at Sweden [Sweden relied primarily on appeals and voluntary participation rather than formal regulations and bans] was enough to consider these indications as proven. However, these voices were removed from the debate from the outset. It is now clear that the RKI was also aware of this medical madness." Mr. Barucker ends with the following appeal to the participants of the press conference: "Now it is finally time for the press to do its job, work through the protocols meticulously and inform the public objectively and fully. After the politically controlled, child-unfriendly pandemic policy, which was supported by so many educators, associations, doctors, parents and journalists, anything else would be a further betrayal of the children and young people of this country."

from wou/annab/avr

Sources/Links: Das Kindeswohl und die neuen RKI-Protokolle - Auszug aus der Pressekonferenz vom 23.07.2024 Ticket: SE-1395 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1e1_5NuDKU