Commemoration of the 5th anniversary of his death: Lübcke must continue to be used for agitation against the ‘right

10.06.2024 | www.kla.tv/29346

On the occasion of the 5th anniversary of the assassination attempt on Walter Lübcke on June 2, 2019, we are showing excerpts from our documentary "Deep State" (www.kla.tv/16518). This still very current documentary is intended to raise awareness of the fact that politics, media campaigns and even assassinations are neither random nor arbitrary, but - according to well-founded research - seem to follow a preconceived agenda almost without gaps. Politicians and leading media are currently warning, with reference to the Lübcke murder case, of an alleged drastic increase in hatred and agitation and of a supposedly increasing right-wing radicalism, which is increasingly said to be emanating from parties such as the AfD. The carefully researched facts in the following short version of the Kla.TV documentary "Deep State" show that a critical and vigilant eye is needed to grasp the real connections and background. What is the "Deep State"? After the murder of the German CDU politician Dr. Walter Lübcke in early June 2019, reports about the background to the murder were pouring in for weeks. The motive for the crime was said to be "hatred from the right," which Lübcke is said to have incurred through a statement made in 2015 at the height of the refugee crisis. The mainstream media immediately conveyed a fixed image: "Right-wing terrorism is the number one danger." As recently as the 1980s, left-wing terrorism was referred to as "public enemy number one." How could the public view turn 180°? Are the enemy images of "right-wing terrorism" and "left-wing terrorism" intended to distract from completely different forces that are torpedoing the rule of law and democracy in the background? The renowned Swiss historian and peace researcher Dr. Daniele Ganser speaks in this context of the so-called "deep state," which has infiltrated democratic structures worldwide with covert warfare and false flag operations. What is the deep state? Since the 1970s, the term "deep state" has described power and decision-making structures in secret services, the military, politics and the judiciary that are not democratically legitimized. Since the 1990s, globally operating networks have been exposed that secretly pursue the interests of a secret power elite. No matter which political party is currently in power, the realization of long-term plans* has been and is being pushed forward unnoticed under the guise of democracy. The goal is to expand power and accumulate money for the globally dominant families (e.g. Rothschilds, Rockefellers). Example 1: Involvement of German state bodies in the NSU case The so-called "Döner murders" were committed between 2000 and 2006, for which the right-wing terrorist cell "National Socialist Underground" - NSU for short - around Beate Zschäpe was held solely responsible. Various investigative journalists, such as Jürgen Elsässer, investigated the case by evaluating court records, among other things. It emerged that state bodies, such as the Thuringian Office for the Protection of the Constitution, were involved in the NSU case. The Office for the Protection of the Constitution, Andreas Temme, was proven to have been involved in setting up the NSU network and, directly or indirectly, in carrying out the aforementioned kebab murders, but this was never thoroughly investigated legally. It must be proven that the Thuringian Office for the Protection of the Constitution played a key role in financing and setting up the right-wing network surrounding the NSU. A mysterious death of witnesses also took place in the NSU's environment. Particularly explosive is the fact that 19 files from the NSU case were destroyed and the remaining files were initially embargoed for 120 years. This embargo was subsequently shortened to 2044. Is the German state trying to cover up its involvement in the NSU affair? Example 2: Lübcke murder case: inconsistencies and exploitation by politicians and the media Since the murder of the CDU politician and Kassel district president Dr. Walter Lübcke, reports and comments about the background to this murder have been pouring in. According to official information, Lübcke was shot in the head on the terrace of his property on the night of June 2nd. The perpetrator is said to be a right-wing extremist named Stephan E. A possible motive for the crime is "hatred from the right", which the politician is said to have attracted, among other things, through a statement he made at the height of the refugee crisis. Although the investigations have not yet allowed any clear conclusions to be drawn, the media headlines are already conveying a ready-made picture: "Right-wing terror is the number 1 danger". There is no doubt that actual terror based on hatred by right-wing or left-wing extremists must be condemned and punished in the strongest possible terms, without question or reservation. But can the violent death of Walter Lübcke actually be clearly and exclusively attributed to a right-wing extremist background?n? At least some of the connections raise important questions: 1. The dead Walter Lübcke was found by his son, who called not the emergency doctor but a friend who was a paramedic from the fair taking place across the street. As it turned out, the paramedic manipulated the crime scene by removing blood and possibly other traces. The rescue workers, who arrived much later, took Walter Lübcke with them, and the bullet hole in his head was only discovered in the hospital. 2. Former constitutional protection officer Andreas Temme, who already played a dubious role in the murders committed by the right-wing NSU network - in other words the National Socialist Underground - between 2000 and 2006, later moved to Walter Lübcke's government agency. Temme was proven to have been directly or indirectly involved in setting up the NSU network and in carrying out the murders. The series of murders of ten predominantly Turkish victims was attributed exclusively to the right-wing network. The state has massively obstructed a real investigation into the murders. At the end of 2011, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution destroyed at least 19 of the explosive files, and the remaining ones have been embargoed for 120 years. Around the NSU trial, there was a conspicuous death of over a dozen witnesses. It is noteworthy that in the Lübcke murder case, one of Temme's undercover agents is once again closely connected to the accused Stephan E. 3. In 2015, the NSU investigative committee had files in front of it that contained "a classified document with relevant information" on Stephan E., the suspect in the Lübcke case. However, as the Hessischer Rundfunk reported, the State Office for the Protection of the Constitution no longer has any personnel files on the alleged murderer of the Kassel district president. The facts are therefore anything but clear. Nevertheless, the investigation is being carried out exclusively against "right-wing" people. But what other possible motives are there in the Lübcke murder case? 1. Lübcke's regional council issues, among other things, permits for wind turbines. During Lübcke's term in office, there were repeated conflicts in the course of these permits, among other things because Lübcke's sons themselves operate several wind and solar parks. As regional president, Lübcke was very "committed" in approving wind turbines, including in important nature reserves, which brought him some angry protests. 2. A bloody crime by the Calabrian mafia Ndrangheta is also conceivable. The Ndrangheta has been active in Kassel for years. It can be proven that the Ndrangheta uses wind turbines to launder billions of dollars from drug, weapons, red-light district and betting shops, which is why a nationwide raid was carried out in 2013. In summary, various information platforms have come to the conclusion that the facts in the Lübcke murder case are extremely unclear and even contradictory. Nevertheless, so far only "right-wing extremists" have been blamed for the murder and politicians have already drawn consequences. For example, Federal Minister of the Interior Horst Seehofer wants to significantly intensify the "fight against right-wing extremism"... However, headlines like this leave no doubt as to the direction in which these consequences are actually aimed: The FAZ of June 19: "Murder of Walter Lübcke - CDU assigns AfD co-responsibility" or ZEIT ONLINE: "Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer blames AfD for Walter Lübcke's death". The SPD's budget policy spokesman Johannes Kahrs demands on Twitter: "... ban the AfD, then dismiss AfD members from their civil service positions." These statements are based on the AfD's critical stance on the federal government's migration policy, which is equated in a completely undifferentiated way with xenophobia, which is said to have provided the breeding ground for this murder. Such media productions, which have been inflated into a “great danger from the right”, such as the NSU murders and the Lübcke murder, are obviously intended to serve as a justification for censorship, surveillance, sanctions and bans on parties such as the AfD, enlightenment movements and free media, and even to the point of excluding critics of the system from society.

from kno./mol./hm.

Sources/Links: ZDF-Nachrichten vom 2. Juni 2024: Gedenkfeier zum 5. Todestag von Walter Lübcke https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten-sendungen/heute-19-uhr/heute-19-uhr-vom-02-juni-2024-100.html
– ab Minute 10:09 Scholz und Steinmeier rufen zu Kampf gegen Hass und Gewalt auf https://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2024-06/walter-luebcke-ermordung-rechte-gewalt-hass-scholz-steinmeier
Auszüge aus dem Dokumentarfilm „Tiefer Staat“ www.kla.tv/16518
Wichtige Quellen zum weiteren Recherchieren: Jasinna: Gedanken zum Mord an Walter Lübcke https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9K9JkbPArCg
Prozess um Lübcke-Mord: Welche Rolle spielen Verfassungsschützer? https://www.compact-online.de/auftakt-zum-luebcke-prozess-welche-rolle-spielen-verfassungsschuetzer/
Urteil im Fall Lübcke: Offene Fragen um die Rolle des Verfassungsschutzes https://www.compact-online.de/urteil-im-fall-luebcke-offene-fragen-um-die-rolle-des-verfassungsschutzes/
Lübcke-Mord, NSU und Ex-Verfassungsschützer Temme: Gibt es weitere Verbindungen? https://www.compact-online.de/luebcke-mord-nsu-und-ex-verfassungsschuetzer-temme-gibt-es-weitere-verbindungen/