Prof. Dr. Stefan Homburg: RKI deletes risk assessments

06.06.2024 | www.kla.tv/29301

For millions of people, the years of the Corona state of emergency were associated with massive restrictions on freedom through lockdowns, curfews and school closures. These measures were justified on the basis of the assessments of the RKI expert council. However, after the publication of the RKI protocols, which were cleared by the magazine Multipolar, it is undeniable that the risk assessment from "moderate" to "high" was not based on scientific data. Now that it has come to light that the classification was made on political instructions, the RKI has deleted the risk assessments from its website. Has evidence of a real analysis of the catastrophic consequences of Corona policy been deleted here? In the following video you can see an analysis by Prof. Dr. Stefan Homburg, former director of the Institute for Public Finance at the University of Hanover. Since the beginning of the Corona crisis, he has repeatedly commented on the political measures with well-founded contributions. Video by Prof. Dr. Stefan Homburg: "RKI deletes risk assessments" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrDBmMqIWwQ Prof. Dr. Stefan Homburg: "Good day, ladies and gentlemen, I welcome you to another episode of Homburg's Background and am pleased that you are back. I have discovered something, and that is that the RKI has deleted the risk assessments for Corona from the Internet. Is that important? Of course! For years our lives depended on these assessments. If the RKI said the risk was moderate or moderate, then we could live like people in earlier times, for centuries. But if the RKI said the risk was high, then daycare and school closures, lockdowns, curfews and old people were isolated in nursing homes and were not allowed to be visited until they died. Regular funerals with many guests were also prohibited. How did I discover that? Well, the starting point was an RKI protocol that I showed you in the last broadcast. This protocol states that the Federal Ministry of Health (BMG) made a requirement in mid-summer 2020 to keep the risk high. This means that the RKI's risk assessments were not based on any scientific findings, but were political guidelines. Now critics have objected that this protocol is from June 29, 2020 and that the risk should be kept high until July 1, 2020, i.e. only two days. I then asked myself until when the risk was actually kept high? To do this, I looked at one of the situation reports from that time, which I am displaying here. And there you can see a link to a special RKI document, risk assessment. I clicked on it and then I got this message - namely that the file was no longer there. I searched for it on the entire RKI server. It could be that it had moved to another location. But it has been deleted. The story would end here if there weren't busy bees who save everything that is fishy in the internet archive so that you can still find it years later. And so I can show it to you now. A document, from April 2020, with a risk assessment by the RKI. Let's take a closer look at what this assessment looks like and whether it allows drastic measures to be decided. Let's look through the text piece by piece. First of all, it says that the WHO has declared a global pandemic. Well, that's true, but the WHO has done that often. Think of the swine flu in 2009 or just two years ago, when monkeypox was declared a global pandemic at the highest warning level. That hardly made it into the media, it was ignored by Germany. There was no monkeypox lockdown, people just didn't want to hear about such pandemics anymore. And the media and politicians thought that this was not a winning topic. Second argument here. It is a very dynamic situation. Yes, cold waves are actually always dynamic and should be taken seriously. In a way, the former Chancellor is quoted with her famous sentence: "I take it seriously, you should take it seriously too." This is of course just a cliché and not a scientific justification. After all, it is said that in some cases the course of the disease is severe. Fatal courses of the disease also occur. That is true, but it applies to every respiratory disease and is not an argument for declaring a lockdown. The decisive point is now at the very bottom. It basically depends on a single word: "The risk to the health of the population in Germany is currently classified as high overall." Now I have downloaded all of these risk assessments from the RKI. And instead of reading them out individually, I will show you a new graphic that I have made from them, which shows the entire timeline of the last few years. Take a look. On the far left you can see January and February 2020.. At that time, politicians and the Robert Koch Institute considered the risk to be low to moderate. And it was said that Corona was something that right-wing radicals had devised to scare the population. Then the risk was upgraded on March 17, 2020, based on a document that I read to you in the last broadcast. Then in June 2020, that was the document that I just showed you, the risk was kept high on the orders of the BMG. This was followed by six months with an even higher risk. During these six months there was another complete lockdown. Then the risk was reduced to high, then again to very high, and after compulsory vaccination failed in the Bundestag in April 2022, the risk was - exactly then - downgraded from very high to high. On the far right we now find the solution, namely the risk was only downgraded to moderate in February 2023, i.e. after almost three years. The pattern of the graph that you see here, small next to me, makes no sense at all, even in the RKI's PCR test logic, which suggests political influence. For comparison, I'll show you the so-called incidences or case numbers here. On the far left you can see a tiny hill at the beginning of 2020. That was the justification for the first lockdown. Then at the end of 2021, when the entire population is vaccinated, the number of cases shoots through the roof and remains consistently higher than in 2020. And there in February 2023, you see, there are still considerable PCR case numbers to be discovered, but the risk is suddenly downgraded to moderate. The interesting question is, of course: Did the BMG give the RKI another instruction in February 2023 to finally downgrade the risk? Unfortunately, Multipolar only released the RKI protocols from 2020 to April 2021 and these were heavily blacked out, as you know. The later protocols are unblacked out, but are not released. Minister Lauterbach has promised to release the unredacted minutes soon - probably after the elections, I think - but he refuses to make the follow-up minutes, which are actually much more interesting for us because they are related to compulsory vaccination, available to the public. So we have to be a little patient until the later minutes are also cleared of liability, which there can be little doubt about, and until then I remain with kind regards, yours, Stefan Homburg. Dear Kla.TV viewers, make those around you aware of this cover-up scandal! Only by thoroughly dealing with the Corona state of emergency can we prevent such crimes against humanity from being repeated.

from vem./ts.

Sources/Links: Prof. Dr. Stefan Homburg: „RKI löscht Risikobewertungen“ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrDBmMqIWwQ
YouTube-Kanal: Prof. Dr. Stefan Homburg https://www.youtube.com/@StHomburg
„Mehr als tausend Passagen geschwärzt: Multipolar veröffentlicht freigeklagte RKI-Protokolle im Original“ https://multipolar-magazin.de/artikel/rki-protokolle-2
„Freigeklagte RKI-Protokolle“ https://my.hidrive.com/share/2-hpbu3.3u#
$/ RKI-Risikobewertungen im Archiv https://web.archive.org/web/20200101000000*/https:/www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Risikobewertung.html