Clear words about RKI protocols and WHO

14.05.2024 | www.kla.tv/29062

Undermining medical ethics and its most important statutes – the Nuremberg Code. There is another aspect of the published RKI protocols that has not yet been addressed. For me this is obvious, the need to talk about it - eminent. Since December 2020 at the latest and to this day, the Nuremberg Code is no longer applicable. The “highly scaled” emergency without evidence and the panic about a coronavirus built up using pseudo-scientific word acrobatics ultimately gave rise to the largest medical experiment in human history – the modRNA injection. Even if we don't have to mourn the (officially) 17 million - if not (unreported) billion - victims of this experiment, the fact remains: the Nuremberg Code was completely repealed, the victims that were needed to achieve this ethical vows to give to the world were and are thereby mocked. The Nuremberg Code defines requirements and limits for medical experiments on humans and makes doctors and researchers personally responsible for the education and safety of patients, with no possibility of transferring this responsibility or excusing it with instructions from above. The norms of the Nuremberg Code have been incorporated into the International Criminal Code. They are legally applicable today – in peacetime and in war. The panic artificially created by the “upscaling” will reach its climax with the signing of the WHO treaty and the International Health Regulations, expected in May 2024. HER]. The billion-dollar “concern” is public health. This means that the WHO understands the entire world population as an average patient, an amorphous mass without a soul, ethnicity, gender, age, family history... - without all the valuable peculiarities that make up a HUMAN BEING and influence individual health. Isn't it the case that some Asians can't tolerate alcohol? To name just one example of delicate individuality... The WHO goes even further: they intend to also include climate goals and environmental health, so it could well become a reality that we are sent into lockdown because trees have a fungal infection. There is no such thing as public health. Health is something individual and intimate. The Nuremberg Code unmistakably manifests the dignity of the individual over the collective good. The non-negotiable dignity of the individual is the essence of the Code - this and the right to say NO without being threatened with ostracism or even termination. But the RKI took measures that left no room for individual health. And on this very basis, the WHO director, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, should gain sole power to declare pandemics and make recommendations, which experience shows will be implemented with anticipatory obedience. This is the essence of totalitarianism. Did the RKI prepare the planned seizure of power by the WHO director or is this an undesirable side effect? The findings from the published RKI protocols must lead to a complete rejection of the WHO, its ambitions for power and the inhumane principle of public health. Otherwise, one would have to assume intent on the part of the RKI, the PEI, the Stiko and the German government: intent in disinformation and psychological terror, intent in destroying the economy and society, intent in destroying families, intent in exploding suicides, intent Damage to health and unprecedented excess mortality in the temporal context or as a result of the experimental injection, intent in the permanent Mascha Orel, Tochter und Enkeltochter von Holocaust-Überlebenden, geb. in der UdSSR

from mo.

Sources/Links: Mascha Orel, Tochter und Enkeltochter von Holocaust-Überlebenden, geb. in der UdSSR