This website uses cookies. Cookies help us to provide our services. By using our services, you consent to our use of cookies. Your data is safe with us. We do not pass on your analysis or contact data to third parties! Further information can be found in the data protection declaration.
Subtitle "Afrikaans" was produced by machine.Subtitle "አማርኛ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "العربية " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Ārāmāyâ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "azərbaycan dili " was produced by machine.Subtitle "беларуская мова " was produced by machine.Подзаглавието "България" е създадено от машина.Subtitle "বাংলা " was produced by machine.Subtitle "བོད་ཡིག" was produced by machine.Subtitle "босански" was produced by machine.Subtitle "català" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Cebuano" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ગુજરાતી" was produced by machine.Subtitle "corsu" was produced by machine.Podtitul "Čeština" byl vytvořen automaticky.Subtitle "Cymraeg" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Dansk" was produced by machine.Untertitel "Deutsch" wurde maschinell erzeugt.Subtitle "Untertitel" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Ελληνικά" was produced by machine.Subtitle "English" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Esperanto" was produced by machine.El subtítulo "Español" se generó automáticamente.Subtitle "Eesti" was produced by machine.Subtitle "euskara" was produced by machine.Subtitle "فارسی" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Suomi" was produced by machine.Le sous-titre "Français" a été généré automatiquement.Subtitle "Frysk" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Gaeilge" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Gàidhlig" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Galego" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Schwizerdütsch" was produced by machine.Subtitle "هَوُسَ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Ōlelo Hawaiʻi" was produced by machine.Subtitle "עברית" was produced by machine.Subtitle "हिन्दी" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Mẹo" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Hrvatski" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Kreyòl ayisyen " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Magyar" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Հայերեն" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Bahasa Indonesia " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Asụsụ Igbo " was produced by machine.Textun"Íslenska" var framkvæmt vélrænt.Sottotitoli "Italiano" sono stati generati automaticamente.Subtitle "日本語" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Basa Jawa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ქართული" was produced by machine.Subtitle "қазақ тілі " was produced by machine.Subtitle "ភាសាខ្មែរ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ಕನ್ನಡ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "한국어" was produced by machine.Subtitle "कोंकणी語" was produced by machine.Subtitle "کوردی" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Кыргызча" was produced by machine.Subtitle " lingua latina" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Lëtzebuergesch" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Lingala" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ພາສາ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Lietuvių" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Latviešu" was produced by machine.Subtitle "fiteny malagasy" was produced by machine.Subtitle "te reo Māori" was produced by machine.Subtitle "македонски јазик" was produced by machine.Subtitle "malayāḷaṁ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "မြန်မာစာ " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Монгол хэл" was produced by machine.Subtitle "मराठी" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Bahasa Malaysia" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Malti" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ဗမာစာ " was produced by machine.Subtitle "नेपाली" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Nederlands" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Norsk" was produced by machine.Subtitle "chiCheŵa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ਪੰਜਾਬੀ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Polska" was produced by machine.Subtitle "پښتو" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Português" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Română" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Язык жестов (Русский)" was produced by machine.Субтитры "Pусский" были созданы машиной.Subtitle "Kinyarwanda" was produced by machine.Subtitle "सिन्धी" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Deutschschweizer Gebärdensprache" was produced by machine.Subtitle "සිංහල" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Slovensky" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Slovenski" was produced by machine.Subtitle "gagana fa'a Samoa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "chiShona" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Soomaaliga" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Shqip" was produced by machine.Subtitle "србски" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Sesotho" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Basa Sunda" was produced by machine.Undertext "Svenska" är maskinell skapad.Subtitle "Kiswahili" was produced by machine.Subtitle "தமிழ்" was produced by machine.Subtitle "తెలుగు" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Тоҷикй" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ภาษาไทย" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ትግርኛ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Tagalog" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Türkçe" was produced by machine.Subtitle "татар теле" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Українська " was produced by machine.Subtitle "اردو" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Oʻzbek" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Tiếng Việt" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Serbšćina" was produced by machine.Subtitle "isiXhosa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ייִדיש" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Yorùbá" was produced by machine.Subtitle "中文" was produced by machine.Subtitle "isiZulu" was produced by machine.
kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV не носи отговорност за некачествен превод.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV nenese žádnou odpovědnost za chybné překlady.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV übernimmt keine Haftung für mangelhafte Übersetzung.kla.TV accepts no liability for inadequate translationkla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV no se hace responsable de traducciones incorrectas.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV n'assume aucune responsabilité en cas de mauvaise traduction.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV nem vállal felelősséget a hibás fordításértkla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV tekur enga ábyrgð á áræðanleika þýðingarinnarKla.TV non si assume alcuna responsabilità per traduzioni lacunose e/o errate.Kla.TV は、不適切な翻訳に対して一切の責任を負いません。kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV не несет ответственности за некачественный перевод.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.Kla.TV tar inget ansvar för felaktiga översättningar.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.
Coverage of a current war – information regarding Corona – news about an American president: as different as the topics may be, the coverage of the leading media widely coincides. This program not only explores the why, but also brings facts and figures regarding the allocations that flow to the various media houses.
[continue reading]
It is well known that print media in particular are constantly losing subscribers. But fewer subscribers also means correspondingly lower revenues! Why newspapers nevertheless continue to do their work and why they can still expand their editions with new sections is the subject of this program.
Virtually all media belong to foundations or even their founders. Well-known names are the Bertelsmann Foundation or the Axel Springer Foundation.
If a media house with its journalists is no longer independent, but dependent on "outside money," it will most likely not report against the convictions of its funder, nor negatively about its foundation. Here is one example:
The German news magazine "DER SPIEGEL" received a donation of $2.5 million from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2018 and another $2.9 million in October 2021. The last mentioned amount was paid by the foundation to realize a community project in "SPIEGEL" through a new section "Global Society". Among other things, topics such as women's rights, contraception, and the climate crisis together with their interactions were discussed.
With the donations, Bill Gates was able to ensure that certain topics were journalistically processed in his sense and were widely distributed among the people through the magazine. Of course, at some point it became known that DER SPIEGEL had received money from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and it had to justify itself. The media house claimed that it continued to do its work completely independently and that it was still possible to report critically on Bill Gates.
When in the course of the Epstein scandal, which was about Jeffrey Epstein himself abusing minors and forcing them into prostitution in order to supply them to his rich and powerful friends, partners and customers, it leaked out that Bill Gates had also maintained close contacts with Epstein. Although at the same time attempts to molest women became known about him in the press, DER SPIEGEL tried to whitewash him. The contact to Epstein had been loose, nothing had been proven. Interesting, because DER SPIEGEL does not treat those prejudged in # MeToo in a squeamish way, only in the case of harassment allegations suspected perpetrators are immediately pilloried in the media. Not so Bill Gates! To explain: Under hashtag MeToo (Me too), a campaign is running on Twitter on which millions of women worldwide have made sexual assaults on them public or are discussing sexual violence.
On a small overview you can see now in the past spoken money to media houses from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. It should be mentioned that every other philanthropist, such as Soros, Rockefeller and all the others, also give money to the media through their foundations or non-governmental organizations. However, since they do not provide detailed information on this, they can unfortunately not be listed.
Funds to media houses from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
To whom
How much
When
Purpose
SPIEGEL
250.000 Euro
2016-2018
For global sustainability goals in the project "Expedition The day after tomorrow"
SPIEGEL
175.000 Euro
2017-2018
journalistic refugee project
„The New Arrivals“
SPIEGEL
2.500.000 Dollar
2018
SPIEGEL
In total
2.280.000 Euro
spread over 3 years
Global Society Section
SPIEGEL
2.900.000 Dollar
Oktober 2021
The Guardian
In total
14.000.000 Dollar
since 2011 7x
Topic Global Society
El País
In total.
4.000.000 Dollar
since 2013 2x
Topic Global Society
Le Monde
In total.
4.000.000 Dollar
since 2014 5x
BBC
In total.
50.000.000 Dollar
since 2005 16x
CNN
3.600.000 Dollar
2020
To other media
250.000.000 Dollar
Until June 2020
Contributions to DER SPIEGEL
250,000 euros during 2016 to 2018 for global sustainability goals in the “Expedition day after tomorrow” project and another 175,000 euros over two years for the journalistic refugee project "The New Arrivals."
Then in 2018, the magazine got two and a half million Dollars without the foundation naming a purpose. Apparently they did their job well!
They then got a total of 2 million 280 thousand Euros, spread over three years, earmarked for the "Global Society" section.
Another 2.9 million Dollars flowed into the account of DER SPIEGEL in October 2021.
Donations have also been made to other well-known newspapers: To the English daily newspaper "The Guardian" a total of 14 million Dollars earmarked since 2011 for the topic Global Society.
Four million Dollars in 2013 to the Spanish newspaper "El País" for the same topic.
To "Le Monde" a total of four million Dollars since 2014.
The British broadcaster BBC has received several cash injections totaling $50 million Dollars since 2005.
Marginal seems the transfer to the U.S. broadcaster CNN. It was one-time and amounted to $3.6 million Dollars in 2020.
Contributions to a wide variety of media totaling $250 million Dollars can then be spotted through June 2020.
Practice shows that the statement “He who pays the piper calls the tune”. Is not only true for the media houses, but the connections are even more far-reaching. The fact is that the various foundations that own the individual media houses are also networked with each other. In the West, these are primarily transatlantic thinking people who set the political course with their networks. These mostly German leaders from politics, academia and the media believe in a global leadership role for the U.S. and bring this American mindset across the Atlantic to Europe, so to speak. The result of their actions was and is to convince all of Europe of the political course of the U.S. and so to keep Europe on course for NATO as well. And since practically every editor-in-chief of the leading media is involved in one of the various transatlantic networks, the same opinion about an issue is reported in all European newspapers. This goes so far that we Europeans hear largely pro-American news and Russia is put in a bad light instead.
For example, the Western media repeatedly criticize Russia heavily for introducing a "foreign agents law" in 2012. "Foreign agents" also refers to politically active non-governmental organizations that are paid by foreign countries. In this context, Russia wants to prevent foreign influence on its domestic politics. Without going into the content in more detail, this criticism can be described as meaningless because Russia copied this law from the U.S. in part using the same wording. There, it has existed since 1938 and bears the name: "Foreign Agents Registration Act." However, the imitated Russian law is much less strict for the same violations. Both the fines and the prison sentences for the same violations are less. But this is what the Western media never tell us when they are once again bashing the Russian agent law. These examples credibly show that our mainstream media are influenced in many ways: From the outside by the so-called philanthropists and foundations and from the inside by the editors-in-chief, who almost without exception belong to a transatlantic network, which have the task of spreading pro-American ideas in Europe.
f you, dear viewer, are interested in this topic in a more detailed way, you will find the content of this program in the newly published book by Thomas Roeper "Inside Corona".
23.09.2022 | www.kla.tv/23682
It is well known that print media in particular are constantly losing subscribers. But fewer subscribers also means correspondingly lower revenues! Why newspapers nevertheless continue to do their work and why they can still expand their editions with new sections is the subject of this program. Virtually all media belong to foundations or even their founders. Well-known names are the Bertelsmann Foundation or the Axel Springer Foundation. If a media house with its journalists is no longer independent, but dependent on "outside money," it will most likely not report against the convictions of its funder, nor negatively about its foundation. Here is one example: The German news magazine "DER SPIEGEL" received a donation of $2.5 million from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2018 and another $2.9 million in October 2021. The last mentioned amount was paid by the foundation to realize a community project in "SPIEGEL" through a new section "Global Society". Among other things, topics such as women's rights, contraception, and the climate crisis together with their interactions were discussed. With the donations, Bill Gates was able to ensure that certain topics were journalistically processed in his sense and were widely distributed among the people through the magazine. Of course, at some point it became known that DER SPIEGEL had received money from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and it had to justify itself. The media house claimed that it continued to do its work completely independently and that it was still possible to report critically on Bill Gates. When in the course of the Epstein scandal, which was about Jeffrey Epstein himself abusing minors and forcing them into prostitution in order to supply them to his rich and powerful friends, partners and customers, it leaked out that Bill Gates had also maintained close contacts with Epstein. Although at the same time attempts to molest women became known about him in the press, DER SPIEGEL tried to whitewash him. The contact to Epstein had been loose, nothing had been proven. Interesting, because DER SPIEGEL does not treat those prejudged in # MeToo in a squeamish way, only in the case of harassment allegations suspected perpetrators are immediately pilloried in the media. Not so Bill Gates! To explain: Under hashtag MeToo (Me too), a campaign is running on Twitter on which millions of women worldwide have made sexual assaults on them public or are discussing sexual violence. On a small overview you can see now in the past spoken money to media houses from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. It should be mentioned that every other philanthropist, such as Soros, Rockefeller and all the others, also give money to the media through their foundations or non-governmental organizations. However, since they do not provide detailed information on this, they can unfortunately not be listed. Funds to media houses from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation To whom How much When Purpose SPIEGEL 250.000 Euro 2016-2018 For global sustainability goals in the project "Expedition The day after tomorrow" SPIEGEL 175.000 Euro 2017-2018 journalistic refugee project „The New Arrivals“ SPIEGEL 2.500.000 Dollar 2018 SPIEGEL In total 2.280.000 Euro spread over 3 years Global Society Section SPIEGEL 2.900.000 Dollar Oktober 2021 The Guardian In total 14.000.000 Dollar since 2011 7x Topic Global Society El País In total. 4.000.000 Dollar since 2013 2x Topic Global Society Le Monde In total. 4.000.000 Dollar since 2014 5x BBC In total. 50.000.000 Dollar since 2005 16x CNN 3.600.000 Dollar 2020 To other media 250.000.000 Dollar Until June 2020 Contributions to DER SPIEGEL 250,000 euros during 2016 to 2018 for global sustainability goals in the “Expedition day after tomorrow” project and another 175,000 euros over two years for the journalistic refugee project "The New Arrivals." Then in 2018, the magazine got two and a half million Dollars without the foundation naming a purpose. Apparently they did their job well! They then got a total of 2 million 280 thousand Euros, spread over three years, earmarked for the "Global Society" section. Another 2.9 million Dollars flowed into the account of DER SPIEGEL in October 2021. Donations have also been made to other well-known newspapers: To the English daily newspaper "The Guardian" a total of 14 million Dollars earmarked since 2011 for the topic Global Society. Four million Dollars in 2013 to the Spanish newspaper "El País" for the same topic. To "Le Monde" a total of four million Dollars since 2014. The British broadcaster BBC has received several cash injections totaling $50 million Dollars since 2005. Marginal seems the transfer to the U.S. broadcaster CNN. It was one-time and amounted to $3.6 million Dollars in 2020. Contributions to a wide variety of media totaling $250 million Dollars can then be spotted through June 2020. Practice shows that the statement “He who pays the piper calls the tune”. Is not only true for the media houses, but the connections are even more far-reaching. The fact is that the various foundations that own the individual media houses are also networked with each other. In the West, these are primarily transatlantic thinking people who set the political course with their networks. These mostly German leaders from politics, academia and the media believe in a global leadership role for the U.S. and bring this American mindset across the Atlantic to Europe, so to speak. The result of their actions was and is to convince all of Europe of the political course of the U.S. and so to keep Europe on course for NATO as well. And since practically every editor-in-chief of the leading media is involved in one of the various transatlantic networks, the same opinion about an issue is reported in all European newspapers. This goes so far that we Europeans hear largely pro-American news and Russia is put in a bad light instead. For example, the Western media repeatedly criticize Russia heavily for introducing a "foreign agents law" in 2012. "Foreign agents" also refers to politically active non-governmental organizations that are paid by foreign countries. In this context, Russia wants to prevent foreign influence on its domestic politics. Without going into the content in more detail, this criticism can be described as meaningless because Russia copied this law from the U.S. in part using the same wording. There, it has existed since 1938 and bears the name: "Foreign Agents Registration Act." However, the imitated Russian law is much less strict for the same violations. Both the fines and the prison sentences for the same violations are less. But this is what the Western media never tell us when they are once again bashing the Russian agent law. These examples credibly show that our mainstream media are influenced in many ways: From the outside by the so-called philanthropists and foundations and from the inside by the editors-in-chief, who almost without exception belong to a transatlantic network, which have the task of spreading pro-American ideas in Europe. f you, dear viewer, are interested in this topic in a more detailed way, you will find the content of this program in the newly published book by Thomas Roeper "Inside Corona".
from pb
www.anti-spiegel.ru/2020/bill-gates-spendet-dem-spiegel-23-mio-euro-wie-unabhaengig-kann-der-spiegel-sein/
www.gruppe.spiegel.de/news/pressemitteilungen/detail/spiegel-online-startet-neues-projekt-globale-gesellschaft
www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants?q=%22The%20Guardian%22
www.theguardian.com/global-development/2010/sep/14/about-this-site
www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants?q=%22El%20Pa%C3%ADs%22
www.elpais.com/planeta-futuro/
www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants/2013/10/opp1090828
www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants?q=%22Le%20Monde%22
www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants?q=%22bbc%22
www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants?q=%22cnn%22
www.cjr.org/criticism/gates-foundation-journalism-funding.php
FARA-Gesetz: www.justice.gov/nsd-fara