Bundestag decides: people bear costs for vaccination damages

18.05.2022 | www.kla.tv/22564

At the end of 2019, the so-called Equalisation of Burdens Act was revised in the German Bundestag in accordance with Article 21, and on December 12, 2019! [Beginning of the Corona Pandemic] the law was enacted under the new name “Act for Regulation of Social Compensation Law”, obtaining validity on January 1st, 2024! The equalisation of burdens was originally introduced in 1949 for the war-victims and war-disabled of the Second World War. The law enabled the federal government to levy compulsory levies and compulsory mortgages over a period of 30 years. The actual Equalisation of Burden ended in 1982, but the law itself continued to exist until the current amendment in late 2019. The term “Welfare for War Victims” was replaced by the word “Social Compensation”. However, what does social compensation mean in the now revised law? It relates in particular to Book 14 of the Social Security Code. This regulates compensation for victims of an act of violence and future possible victims of the two world wars, who suffer damage to their health and the resulting damage, for example due to ordnance which was not discovered before. It also compensates people who have suffered damage to their health while doing their community service. The following passage of the new regulation, however, makes you prick your ears: Persons, who have suffered damage to their health as a result of a protective injection or other specific prophylactic measures in accordance with the Infection Protection Act, are also compensated. The cardinal question that necessarily arises here and needs to be answered is the following: what exactly is prophylaxis? Was an obligatory injection or vaccination, as is currently being planned in Germany, already taken into account, when the law was amended? For, depending on how the new law will be assessed and interpreted, the Equalisation of Burden for those injured by vaccination might indeed become justified. This would mean that from all those people in Germany, who own certain assets, compensation payments could be enforced, which would not even halt at expropriation. Again, it is the citizens that are asked to pay. As actually happened twice in the past, the German people might bleed dry and be held liable – for products, liability for which should actually lie with the manufacturer, i.e. with the pharmaceutical companies that manufactured the so-called protective injections. The emphasis here is on ‘should’, because contracts were signed between the EU and vaccine manufacturers, which oblige the contracting states to bear all the costs for eventual compensation payments. [For this we recommend the program www.kla.tv/21582 (in German)] But what happens to those vaccine-injured who claim damages? The burden of proof is with them which means that they must prove that the occurred damage is likely to be attributed to the injection that took place. Listen and be amazed, because this was also redefined in paragraph 2 number 11 of the Infection Protection Act as follows: “An Injection Damage is the health and economic consequence, caused by the injection. in case it goes beyond the usual extent of an injection reaction and leads to a permanent health damage which lasts longer than 6 months.” So we conclude that “the buck stops with the people”, once again. Although a distinction has been made between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated, we will all be reunited at the latest, when we bear the costs for the vaccinated! However, let’s not focus on the question of costs, but rather on the question why our government passed this law at the end of 2019, i.e. immediately before the corona pandemic hit. Coincidence? And why with effect only from 01/01/2024 on? Is a huge wave of vaccine damages to be expected? All these questions will probably be dismissed as conspiracy theories, but 2024 is not far off and there are already many victims. As the last Indian chief Seattle said: We shall see! In view of how precisely, down to the smallest detail, the laws were enacted in the Bundestag and how their application is detailed and timely, it could be suspected that this change in the Equalisation of Burdens Act was the work of clairvoyants and crystal ball readers.

from wa./avr.

Sources/Links: Amendment of the Burden Equalization Act https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9BZC6R15uM
States assume liability for vaccine damage www.kla.tv/21582