Doctors Warn: This Vaccine Is Dangerous! – Physicians' statements from opposite ends of the globe on the dangers of the Covid-19 vaccine

04.10.2021 | www.kla.tv/20078

"The list of doctors who are critical of the covid pandemic response and against the push to administer an experimental vaccination, especially for the young, is long and growing. Not all doctors who are critical of the vaccine agree on the exact nature of Covid-19. There is not perfect agreement among them on the danger of covid-19, the origin of virus, whether it is man-made or natural, whether it escaped from a laboratory and if so was that accidental or on purpose, and even whether or not the existence of the virus itself has been proven. These doctors may differ on Covid-19, but here is where they are in complete agreement. This experimental vaccine is dangerous. Today, we feature two doctors from the East and the West. Dr. Marcus de Brun from Ireland, and Dr. Makoto Ohashi from Japan.” Dr Marcus de Brun holds degrees in Microbiology from Trinity College in Dublin, and Medicine from the Royal College of Surgeons in Dublin, and he has a diploma in Philosophy from the University of London. He is a former member of the New Zealand College of General Practice, and a former member of the Irish College of General Practice. Dr De Brun has been a General Practitioner in Dublin since 2010. He was presently a member of the Medical Council of Ireland, but resigned from the council in April 2020 in protest of the nursing home fatalities. Dr. Makoto Ohashi is a Medical Doctor who graduated from the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences at Kyoto University. He worked at the Institute of Medical Science at the University of Tokyo, the Miyazaki Medical Science University, and the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology in the United States before becoming a professor at the at the University of Tokushima. His is an expert in infectious diseases, immunology, vaccine research and autoimmune diseases. [Dr. Marcus De Brun on the necessity of the vaccine for the children. ] [Dr. De Brun: “I would not administer this novel gene therapy (this vaccine) to my children under any circumstances.] They absolutely do not need this, In Ireland, in the past 12-month period, we’ve had 70,000 PCR-confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the age cohort 0 to 24 and no recorded deaths. And these are cases not where somebody says, “Oh, I think I might have had a bit of COVID.” No. [This is] what the government is saying [with] the PCR [in which] they have absolute faith. That’s the kind of diagnostic (for determining these numbers). So, PCR positive confirmed cases, 70,000 in that cohort. You know, as a microbiologist, you can’t even get infection ratios or mortality statistics until you get some numbers. So, in that cohort, 0 to 24 years, we don’t have any recorded deaths. Now, I’m sure there’s one or two in that group who definitely had COVID and maybe had some serious underlying conditions and did die. So, I’m sure somebody will come up and say, “There’s been two or there’s been three. ”But even if there were 10, even if there were 20, out of 70,000, the statistics, the science of it doesn’t add up. So, [my short answer] to the question is that my children absolutely do not and healthy children absolutely do not need this vaccine. [Dr. Ohashi　– On the contents of the vaccines ] Dr.Ohashi: Pfizer's vaccine- they have a document. They make this document available to us. There they state that Pfizer's vaccines has lipids. Four kinds of lipids. Small particles. Dan: Nano particles? Ohashi: Nano particles. After injection, such nano particles spread all over the body, and they especially accumulate in the liver, spleen and ovaries. They include polyethylene-glycol, in one of the four lipid components. That (unintelligible 2:35) is very dangerous for living organisms. We use polyethylene glycol for some skin care. We spread it on the skin, but it's very different if we inject it. It covers the cell membranes. The MRNA vaccine is not a protein.They (the PG) send the MRNA to the cells. When it attaches to the cell. They fuse a toxic lipid component to the cell membrane, and it stays there after fusing. [Dr. De Brun on the unique nature of the mRNA vaccines] The second reason that I would have for not giving [it to] my own children or giving it to any child, really, is a little bit more nuanced. This word “vaccine” is a very nice word. It’s a word that I used to love [and] I [have given] children their full vaccination schedule [for] all my 20 years of practice. Vaccines are very, very important and represent probably the single greatest achievement that medical science arguably has made. The single greatest contribution to the health and well-being of human beings would be in that bucket that we call vaccines. So, I have a lot of faith in vaccines. But, these two types of vaccine—the mRNA vaccine and the DNA vaccine—these are entirely different “vaccines.” And a lot of physicians like myself would argue that something went wrong when we started to even call this a vaccine, because what a vaccine is and what a vaccine has always been—the vaccines that I have given up until COVID—were where you take a piece of the dead bug or you kill the bug, break up the bug, and you take a piece of the bug, and you inject it into someone’s arm, and then our immune system recognizes this piece of the bug and makes antibodies to it. So, now you’ve got antibodies to pieces of a dead bug that you’ve been injected with. And when you encounter a live bug, or when you encounter the real bug, you’ve got antibodies to it. That’s the basis of vaccines. That’s the basis of traditional vaccines. You get the dead bug or a piece of the bug, you make antibodies to it, you encounter the bug for real, and you’ve got the antibodies to it. These vaccines are completely and totally different to that process. You are not getting a piece of the bug that you can make an antibody to. You’re not getting that. What you are getting when you’re injected with these vaccines is viral vector vaccines. That’s what they are. And you’re essentially being injected with the gene to make a piece of the bug, and this is crucial. People don’t get this: You’re getting the gene to make a piece of the bug. You’re injected with the gene, with the vaccine, and your own cells in the dermis, in the subdermal tissue, in the skin, your own cells will take up that gene, and your own cells will be programmed to manufacture the spike protein from the COVID virus. And your own cells will burst, or spill, or leak that spike protein out into your blood system and then you will get antibodies to the spike protein. Now, what’s happening in that process, even though I’ve just described it in kind of simple terms, what’s happening in that process is that the vaccine is operating not in the bloodstream, where a piece of the dead bug is floating in your blood like a piece of dirt or something that might get into your system and your body is reacting to it. No. Your own internal cellular genetic mechanism to make things, that’s been interfered with, by a pharmaceutical company. This is completely and utterly different. It’s for that reason, the experimental nature of how the vaccine actually works, that I would absolutely not give it to my own children. I mean, the downstream consequences of interfering with that process, not the downstream consequences of the vaccine, because vaccines, I believe, are good and the vast majority of vaccines, I believe, are good. But the downstream consequences of interfering with that intimate cellular process, the downstream consequences of that I would be very worried about.So, with children and with pregnant women, where cellular reproduction and growth and puberty and all of these fundamentally important things are happening, interfering with that type of genetic process, in my mind, is very, very risky stuff. Very, very risky stuff. So, that would be the second reason I would absolutely not give it to my children. [Dr. Ohashi in the long-term effects of the vaccine on the ovaries] Ohashi : So you know. We have the veins and arteria. Blood vessels. And there we have epitherial cells covering the inner side of the blood vessels, and such cells are very stable cells. And a lot of the whole life, is what is believed. So the MRNA lipid particles fuse to the epitherial cells, and such a lipid is (cannot be) removed. It remains. So you know the ovaries have many small vessels- capillaries- inside. And I think such a lipid particle attaches to the capillaries in the ovaries. And the ovaries is the place for the development of the egg. It takes a long time. And it leads to the baby. And during such a process- a very complex process- and if small kids inject it, such an effect lasts a long time, so we can know the result of such an injection after ten or twenty years. Dan: Oh. We will only know after ten... Ohashi: Yes, that's right. So it's quite a bit different from the effect on the uterus. The uterus. In babies. A newborn baby comes out within one year. So we can know the result with one year, but the effect on ovaries takes a very very long time, so we have no data about what will happen after the injection for small kids, or school kids. [Dr. De Brun on the efficacy of the vaccine] The third and final reason I wouldn't give it to my children is the absolute ridiculous nature of this notion that it will actually help them. Let's say it's not dangerous and that interfering with our genetics and getting ourselves to make these spike proteins is actually fine. There's no harm and no risk. Let's buy that (agree to that). Swallow that pill. What your cells are actually making is a two-year old version of the spike protein. The code was sequenced to make the spike protein. That code was given to the pharmaceutical companies two years ago. So what you're getting when you take the vaccine, and your cells manufacture the spike protein, and release it into your system. What they are releasing, you're getting antibodies too, is the spike protein as it existed two years ago. Now we know that coronaviruses are part of the family of cold viruses. When people get the common cold, most physicians know that 20 or 30% of common colds that people get are covid viruses. That has always been the case. We've never been able to invent a vaccine for the common cold because it evolves all the time. Again, I'm kind of smiling because this is all considered conspiracy now. This used to be hard science. But we've never been able to vaccinate against the common cold. Never. Because it evolves. The spike protein changes. Now, any physician would think that if you're getting a spike protein that's two years old, and you compare that to somebody who has encountered covid in the community, in society, they will have antibodies to the current virus that is out there, they will also have... The coronavirus is made up of 29 proteins. There are 29 protein building blocks that go into making a single covid virus, as we know. If you encounter Dan or Marcus walking down the street, and we encounter covid, it gets into our nose and we get kind of an asymptomatic infection as 99% of people will, if you get normal, natural immunity to covid, or to the common cold, you will have antibodies, potential antibodies to 29 proteins. So any physician, scientist or any lunatic that wants to kind of suggest that somehow if you have been injected with a two-year old copy of a single spike protein that was given from the Chinese government secret sealed code to the vaccine manufacturer, if you get that, then you're going to be better off than somebody who has got potential antibodies to 29 proteins in today's virus, you know, the arguments are facile. [Dr. Ohashi on testing for previous infection] Dan: Why do they not test you for previous infection and antibodies before you get a vaccine? It seems like it would be nice to know if I've already had Corona first. Do they do that in Japan? Do they first test you for antibodies? Or do they go straight to the vaccine every time? Ohashi: Yeah, that's a problem. We have to check the blood antibody level to check, for example, we intend to get the antibodies for spike protein so we have to pre-check the level of antibodies. Dan: And do they check that? O: No, no. Dan: They don't check it. O: They don't check it. And that is the problem. So, if we want to know the effect of the injection, we have to check before the injection and after the injection. We have to compare the antibody level. But we never get the blood before and after injection. No check. So we can't know about the effect of the injection. [Dr. De Brun on the vaccine as an end to the pandemic] De Brun: Before the vaccine came out there was this kind of promise that the vaccine's going to save us. You get your vaccine. You get your normal back. Life will be good. Just take the jab and everything will be good. So, I can understand how millions and millions of people kind of bought into that. Even in a surreal state where that promise was broken and people were then told, “Well you know, if you've had the jab it doesn't matter. You can still get it and stuff, so you have to still wear your mask and follow all these restrictions and mask your kids. I thought when they came out with that shit, I thought to myself, “OK, it's game over now.” People are going to be on the streets, because it's over now. Because surely, people are not that stupid, to actually buy into the, “OK, I'll take the jab. Fine. This is going to get me out of it.” And then to be told, “Well, you know what. We've changed our minds, you still have to... And you know what, we're going to have to give you a third jab. And you might actually need a fourth one after that. Because if the first one is going to work, you're going to have to get a second one. And if the second one has any hope of working, you'll need the third one. But you know, if the third is going to work or be of any benefit to you... But this is the surreal world (we're living in). People are, by the millions, buying into this. They're on the streets saying, “Have you had your third jab? Are you going to get your fourth one?” Because the vast majority of people are so heightened by fear, now they find it acceptable to get vaccinated multiple times, and still wear masks, and still follow all the restrictions, so my question is, “How far is it going to go?” I honestly thought that when they started injecting children... the first thing I thought was when they tell people you've got to wear the mask after you've been vaccinated I thought, “Right. This is it. It's going to break now. “But it didn't. Then I thought to myself, “OK, if they're going to start giving this vaccine to children, who clearly do not need it, without a shadow of a doubt. For children, this is completely irrelevant medicine- for young kids.” [Dr. Ohashi on the danger of Corona virus infection] Dan: Mothers and fathers are in a situation right now where they're making decisions for their 13 to 18 yr. old children. Do you have any advice? Any suggestions for these parents? Ohashi- So, I must say, don't believe the result of the PCR test because at present there are many false positive cases there, so I'm suspicious that (there are) some dangerous diseases are spreading in Japan. Just many people gave a false positive result of the PCR test doesn't mean the spread of a dangerous infectious disease in Japan. So don't be afraid of the infection. [Dr. De Brun on natural immunity vs vaccination] It's very interesting. Recently there was a study. The largest population-based study and it was published in the Guardian. It was the largest population-based study in terms of comparing natural immunity that mother-nature has endowed us with that we relied on to get us where we are today. In comparing the efficacy of that to vaccine efficacy. The recent study was done in Israel. The largest population-based study to date ever done. And they found that you're six times more likely to get Delta variant covid if you've been vaccinated than somebody who is walking down the street and has natural covid exposure and has as we say antibodies- has natural immunity. Mother nature's mechanism of looking after us and taking care of us- we relied on for aeons. You're six times more likely. If you're doing what the government is saying and you're locking down and isolating and wearing your mask- if any of that rubbish has actually worked and protected you, and you don't have naturally acquired antibodies and you go ahead and get the vaccine- and you're depending on that- well, the idiocy level there- the idiocy of that is patently clear. You're actually six times more likely now; the government has created an individual, a gullible individual, who is six times more likely to get delta variant. Not only that, but the researchers on this particular study, and people can find it; it's there in the Guardian. The research is that not only are you six times more likely to get Delta variant, but you're seven times more likely to get a symptomatic covid infection. Which means you're seven times more likely to have symptoms- to be unwell. So, if we follow this ridiculous, anti-science, idiotic narrative that's coming from Pharma, politicians, and vested interests and riding the crest of a fear wave, if we follow that, not only is it entirely anti-science, anti-evolutionary medicine, anti basic biology, it actually is putting people at significantly higher risk and danger. [Dr. Ohashi on the permanence of the injection] Ohashi- If they get the injection it's very difficult to recover (remove) it. Because the current injection is lipid particles. Dan: Right. And so it stays in. Ohashi: And it's very difficult to remove it. So once it's injected, it remains for life. Dan: All your life. Ohashi: All the life. Yeah. So be very careful about it.

from wd

Sources/Links: -