The situation in Syria continues to escalate.
But what does the USA have to do with it? What does Russia have to do with it?
What does Daniele Ganser say and what does Ernst Wolff say, for example?
Hello my dears, my name is Krissy Rieger from the Investmentakademie Rieger Consulting.
And I'm telling you, I have so, so many statements here based on evidence.
So everything really should be passed on so that you can understand the situation a little better, so that you can
recognize the connections and really form your own opinion.
Since the end of November, the situation in Syria has continued to deteriorate.
Rebel groups have recently captured several cities and an offensive is underway in Damascus.
Now there are various reports about it and therefore: What kind of opinion should one form about it at all?
Accordingly, I have various statements for you, including past and present ones, which will shed some light on these connections.
"Die Zeit" writes: "Syrian army declares Assad's rule over - insurgents are in Bashar al-Assad's palace in Damascus."
Assad the president, at least the past president, but I'll tell you all that now.
"The dictator is said to have left Syria." Therefore passed.
"The government is ready to hand over power." This is what "Die Zeit" writes.
The Syrian capital, Damascus, has fallen into the hands of the rebel alliance led by the
Islamist militia HTS. The Assad regime has fallen.
This was first announced on Sunday by the militiamen themselves and shortly afterwards by the Syrian army.
You can now see various videos that are going viral on social media showing the Syrian army quickly throwing on
civilian clothes and trying to simply leave the villages in order to get out of the situation as best they can.
Within a few days, important cities such as Aleppo, Homs and Daraa fell.
What happened there is the big question.
Because after years, one could now say years, of relative stalemate in the Syrian civil war, a few weeks ago Islamist
militias, or rebel groups as they say, launched a major offensive and then overthrew the current or
recent Syrian government under Assad accordingly.
The first question is: did it even start as a classic civil war? That is very, very important.
For example, if we also look at Ukraine: Was that at all what it seems to be?
And I've already reported on this several times: No, it wasn't like that.
And just as in Syria, it seems that things are not as they are made out to be.
In any case, a classic civil war would at least be citizens against the government. Was it like that?
Here I have a statement from Madelyn Hoffman, she is from New Jersey Peace Action.
And she says: "I've been a peace activist for 16 years and went to Syria to see for myself. This is not a civil war in Syria.
We've heard that time and time again, but it's not true.
We are not fighting Assad against his people.
Assad is fighting against mercenaries and terrorists who are supported from abroad.
From Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, the USA and Israel.
But we as the USA have no right to carry out a regime change in Syria.
That is forbidden. We must stop supporting mercenaries in Syria."
Of course, that sheds a completely different light on the whole situation. But let's look further.
Who is Assad? In fact, the Wikipedia article has already been changed. And right today. Funnily enough.
Bashar Assad is a Syrian politician who was president of Syria from 2000 to 2024, i.e. until today, and ruled
the country in a dictatorial manner. So already changed.
Assad himself said that he also wants help for the Christians, who are under great threat.
Because there is also a religious conflict in Syria.
And here, for example, is what this newspaper says: "Christians are the main victims. The number of Christians in Syria is
falling steadily. Complains Middle East expert Matthias Kopp.
Their current situation in Aleppo is devastating."
Did you know that Syria was once even a Christian country and that all the Christians have now been driven out more and more?
It is said that by 2019, i.e. in a very short space of time, around 500,000 Christians had recently left again.
And now there is talk of a percentage, if that is correct, of 8 to 10 percent, of how many Christians are still living in Syria.
Also interesting: an investigative journalist who also turned his attention to the Nord Stream pipeline story,
where he then pretty much lost his reputation, at least in the mainstream media - namely Seymour Hersh.
In 2016, he said: "In 2006, William Roebuck, who worked at the US embassy in Damascus, recommended stoking
religious tensions in Syria in order to destabilize Assad.
Another dispatch from 2006 shows that the US embassy had spent 5 million dollars on financing dissidents."
Here, too, the question is: What is behind this?
And here, too, there are more players involved than we think.
That's always the case - when a conflict gets out of hand, you always think: well,
it's only about the people and the government.
But Russia is also involved here, for example, and not just the USA. Russia is also involved here. And they are accusing the USA.
The foreign ministers of Russia, Turkey and Iran met in the Qatari capital Doha to discuss the rapid developments in Syria.
And Lavrov of Russia, the Russian Foreign Minister, assured Damascus that Moscow would continue
to support the army against the terrorist attack.
Quote: "Russia's role is to fight terrorist groups in Syria. Even if they say they are no longer terrorists.
He blamed the US government's policy for the escalation and said that the Syrian people had
become victims of a new geopolitical experiment."
On behalf of the three countries, he also called for dialog between the Syrian government and the opposition fighters.
But in the meantime it looks more likely that Assad will be dropped and will not be supported for long.
Even Iran, which has also pledged its support for Assad, has withdrawn its military commanders
and staff from Syria, or at least begun to do so.
So it looks more like the support is completely gone, at least now.
So you can see that Russia is also involved here and there are more and more players involved.
And you can imagine that Germany's opinion won't be far away either.
You can see what's happening in Ukraine right now.
Well, what does Daniele Ganser say about Syria? Let's take a look here too:
"2011, as I said, also under Obama and the attack on Syria. Here Syria with the capital Damascus.
The situation at the time was that the USA wanted to overthrow the President of Syria, Assad. But that did not succeed.
So immediately after the war in Libya was the war in Syria.
And Assad could not be overthrown, even though the US tried.
The USA then started bombing Syria in 2014.
But they already intervened covertly in Syria in 2011."
According to Ganser, the attack on Syria in 2011 was at least covertly carried out by the USA.
Perhaps someone also remembers the start of the civil war in Syria in 2011 in the wake of the Arab Spring.
So the Arab Spring was a series of waves of protest that gripped Arab countries in Africa and the Middle East.
Then the official attack in 2014. And here I actually have a speech by Obama from 2014.
And then he said, quote: "They beheaded two American journalists in a barbaric way.
IS poses a threat to the people of Iraq and Syria.
If they are not confronted, these terrorists will threaten the entire region and also the USA.
In the fight against IS, we cannot rely on the Assad regime, which is terrorizing its own people.
This regime has lost its legitimacy."
And here I also have a nice old article where it says:
"At last! Obama reaches for the big stick. This night, the USA officially intervened in the Syrian
war for the first time." Emphasizes "officially".
Previously, other views and other interventions.
And Russia has also been involved here, having started bombing Syria in 2015.
So yes, we have the USA, which has started to bomb.
And then came Russia, which also started bombing in order to help Assad.
Because he, in turn, wanted to help them in other ways.
So, you see, it's always about interests.
It is always said that it is about democracy, it is about the people.
Of course, it's about the people and that's why we bomb them.
Because we want to protect and free them.
And so that they can then also vote democratically and so on.
So the USA has also been involved here for a long time.
Here we also have a statement from Robert Kennedy Junior.
And he said in 2016, quote: "The Syrian war is a pipeline war.
It began in 2000, when Qatar declared that it would build a 1,500-kilometer natural gas pipeline through Saudi
Arabia, Jordan and Syria to Turkey for 10 billion dollars."
Turkey, we remember, talks, Russia, Turkey, Syria, as they said.
And then, last but not least, I have statements from Ernst Wolff on current events in Syria.
On the one hand, he says: "The USA has spent billions on arming terrorists in Syria since 2011.
The fact that they are striking right now is no coincidence."
Perhaps that answers the question, why exactly now?
"After the possible imminent end of the Ukraine war, the US arms industry needs another profitable battlefield."
And he also writes: "In Syria, the people are not rising up against the government."
That fits back to the beginning. Where I told you it was a civil war?
Is it really or did it start that way?
And here he writes: "The supposed rebels are the product of American policy.
Financed, armed and supported by the USA.
The aim is to give the US vassal Netanyahu even more influence in the Middle East."
And here it really has to be said that Trump has also said that he will not help Assad
now, but will push this forward, so to speak.
Basically, the entire conflict surrounding Israel - he will not create peace here, but here it was said quite clearly: he
will at least support the whole thing against Iran as well.
And now, interestingly, what does former President Assad actually say about this?
In 2016, he said the following and that would fit into this whole topic.
SRF reports: "Do you see it as a lie that the world sees you as a war criminal?"
And he says: "As president, I defend my country against terrorists who have invaded Syria as proxies for other countries.
They should be charged as war criminals:
1. George Bush, he invaded Iraq without a mandate from the UN Security Council.
2. Cameron and Sarkozy, who invaded Libya without a mandate from the Security Council and destroyed the country.
3. the Western leaders who have supported the terrorists in Syria over the last 5 years and imposed an
embargo that has killed thousands of civilians in Syria.
The West wants to overthrow me." That is this opinion.
Now you don't have to say, oh that's the good guy or those are the good guys, they want order or he only wanted the good.
Basically, you have to say that social justice around the world is so far apart that you can see how badly
off the majority of people around the world actually are.
You can't really point the finger in Germany yet, because of course many people are even worse off.
This does not mean that this suffering should be relativized in any way.
But what you see is social justice, nobody has ever been interested in that.
That there should ever be fairness or justice or real democracy.
I always say that we live in a sham democracy. Why is that?
Every few years you are asked to tick a box and this box has absolutely no effect on the future.
Because this little cross only means that it then says what everyone knows, ah promises were broken.
Politicians have not held their ground. Politicians have simply turned around completely without further ado.
As we have now seen so well with the Greens, for example.
The voters elected them because they promised this and that and in the end there was war and arms deliveries and, above all,
to other countries, which was previously a red rag for them.
And that is precisely why I always talk about sham democracy, because that is not democracy.
Democracy means that power comes from the people.
This means that the people should actually always have power and make the decisions.
Now it is the view from above, I say, that the majority of people simply have no idea.
And I don't want to disagree completely, because the majority of people are absolutely
manipulated. But that is just as intentional in the system.
The education is already completely miserable and then you are manipulated the whole time.
And then you have this crazy opinion that you think you're somehow in the right or know everything better, even though
you haven't done any research or informed yourself at all.
And accordingly, this content that I have offered you here serves solely to simply be open to other opinions and
just let it sink in and think about what do I really believe?
I am being told something here and told something here.
I can't have a stubborn opinion. I must always be open to the fact that everything is
completely different from what I have been told.
And accordingly, please feel free to send me your information on the current situation in Syria.
And of course we'll see you in the next video. Bye!