Imagine the most romantic and beautiful day in the life of a couple .
Two loving people are celebrating their wedding, you may see them in front of the altar, everything is
beautifully decorated, everyone is festively dressed...
By the way , at this point most people think that the couple in question are a man and a woman, don't they?
- But that's just by the way - This man and woman are sitting in the wedding service to receive a blessing for their future.
The priest officiates and gives the bride and groom some helpful words on the way to their marriage.
For this he uses a very common biblical passage:
"(...) and as male and female HE created them ..."!
And now watch out, because theoretically the clergyman wouldn't have to add anything more to this in order
to end up with a completely disastrous lawsuit before the European Court of Justice.
Why? Well, he forgot to mention the more than 70 other gender identities .
On April 5 of this year 2024, the Legal Committee of the UN General Assembly concluded its meeting in New York.
A treaty was discussed that would redefine the terminology of "crimes against humanity" .
Jochen Sommer has published an article on this in the information portal "ansage.org":
"IRREAL UN PLAN: CRITICISM OF LGBTQ AND GENDER AWARENESS SHOULD IN THE FUTURE BE A "CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY""
"LGBTQ ideology should be protected from its critics and declared politically sacrosanct .
Any rejection of and resistance to the "colorful" rainbow mania should in future be declared the worst conceivable
"crime" and sanctioned accordingly by international law."
Consequently, all other opinions, even those already implied, which are an essential part
of a living democracy, should be criminalized.
Regardless of whether the content of the opinion was actually intended to say something completely different, concludes Sommer.
If certain opinions on scientific and biological facts, traditional values and Christian worldview are not
adapted to LGBTQ , the UN is considering using this treaty to classify them as "crimes against humanity".
An example for a better understanding:
Imagine a discussion in which someone comments on a situation in which a couple, consisting of two men, wants to raise children.
Someone claims that these two men will never develop the same kind of relationship with the child as the
natural mother-child bond of the biological mother.
This neutral, purely scientific and biologically indisputable statement could very quickly be interpreted as discrimination
under the aspect of "crimes against humanity" in the future, as both scientifically based statements and biological
facts would suddenly be subject to ideological views by law.
CitizenGO, in a petition, calls this said draft treaty troubling because one of the most respected international bodies is
openly considering labeling biological truth a hate crime....
And the UN Legal Committee is, it should be noted , one of the most important committees at the United Nations.
Binding law is decided here worldwide .
Once adopted by the General Assembly and ratified by the member states, the treaties and conventions drafted
here can become binding international legal instruments.
According to this draft treaty, any political or religious statement directed against transgender dogma is
to be treated as a form of gender-based persecution - and thus as a crime against international law.
And not only agenda-critical journalists, but also priests and pastors who express gender-critical views are to be punished.
international bodies, Sommer said.
The draft treaty proposes for example a radical change in the definition of " gender-based persecution".
The 1998 Rome Statute of the International Court of Justice originally stated very clearly:
"For purposes of this statute, the term 'gender' shall be deemed to refer to the two sexes,
male and female, in the context of society.
The term 'gender' has no other meaning than the above."
According to the UN, there has been considerable progress in our ideas about gender since the
adoption of the Rome Statutes at the end of the 1990s .
The "new idea of gender" refers to the UN's idea that everyone could freely "choose" their gender, in which the
"assigned" or "read" sexuality is only a "social construct".
But in principle, it is the worldwide introduction of the "self-determination law"
of several EU countries, including Germany.
This law is coupled with the restrictions of the "Digital Services Act" and stricter
criminal provisions against alleged "disinformation".
[From now on, any criticism should be declared a crime.
This draft treaty threatens the fundamental right of people to freely articulate and publicly defend their own
convictions regarding tradition, marriage, family and the biological nature of sex, Sommer's article continues.
Consequently, an open discourse must take place, if only because of the countless victims of this gender ideology.
The people affected are demanding that their stories be heard and that their bitter experiences are no longer kept under wraps.
But the victims themselves say that they are being terrorized.
Moreover, there are hardly any psychologists who dare to take care of them - for fear of
persecution, otherwise the doctors would lose their license!
De-transition, i.e. a return to one's natural birth gender, is absolutely undesirable, as it thwarts
the ideologically hyped plans of the gender lobby.
Here we have the true "crime against humanity" when victims are denied help by experienced doctors and
psychologists, let alone the curtailment of EVERYONE's right to free expression of natural facts.
This falsification of legal concepts with its twisted definitions of "persecution" and " crime" must be stopped at all costs .