On September 3, 2024, a court ruled for the first time that the facility-based vaccination requirement
was probably unconstitutional in the coronavirus era.
A nursing assistant from Lower Saxony has filed a lawsuit against an entry and activity ban
issued by the district of Osnabrück in 2022.
She had received this when she failed to comply with the facility-related vaccination requirement.
The NDR reported: "In the view of the Osnabrück judges, the compulsory nursing vaccination violated the fundamental
right to physical integrity and freedom of occupation.
In spring 2022, the Federal Constitutional Court declared the compulsory nursing vaccination to be legal. However, the Osnabrück
Administrative Court has now ruled that the independence of official decision-making must be called into question.
As the nursing assistant who brought the case argued, it was already known at the time that a
coronavirus vaccination does not prevent infection.
This is evident from the RKI protocols published this spring."
The court further writes in its press release: "Based on the minutes of the Covid-19 crisis team of the Robert Koch Institute
(RKI) that are now available and the witness hearing of Prof. Dr. Schaade, President of the RKI, conducted today in
this context, the independence of the official decision-making process must be called into question."
This has far-reaching consequences. The online newspaper Tichys Einblick writes:
"In future, the judiciary will no longer be able to rely on the scientific independence of the RKI in its court decisions."
The competent administrative court suspended the legal proceedings on 3.9.2024 and referred the matter to the
Federal Constitutional Court, as the administrative court itself does not have the authority to reject standards.
Now the Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe is to decide whether the fundamental right to physical integrity and freedom
of occupation have been violated by the facility-based vaccination obligation and the associated prohibition of activity.
Data analyst Tom Lausen was present at the court hearing in Osnabrück and commented on it as follows:
The court had selected various parts of the minutes and actually wanted to ask what Mr. Schaade had to say about them.
This is the first time that the RKI protocols - both the redacted protocols initially leaked by Paul Schreyer through an IFG
request and the protocols leaked later - have been legally used.
The court introduced these protocols with a total of 57 pages and then always made them
available to Mr. Schaade and his companion.
And they then had to make statements on certain issues, including the pandemic of the
unvaccinated and many, many other questions.
And the dish did an excellent job.
The chairman in particular was very, very, very, very determined - he asked very, very
precise questions. Very special things came to light.
Nobody realized that, not even the Federal Constitutional Court, and I think everyone is incredibly upset.
What is special is that Mr. Schaade has revealed that the issue of risk assessment, i.e. the upgrading of a hazard, is obviously
not necessarily subject to the technical assessment of the RKI, but rather represents a political directive, but possibly
a so-called management issue, as he has always called it.
So there were scientific issues and management issues and Mr. Schaade clearly placed it in the area of management issues, so
that we now know from Mr. Schaade that the risk upgrade at the time for the lockdown - this was not said directly, but it can
now be clearly inferred from the explanations - the risk upgrade is a management
arrangement or organizational management arrangement.
So, I just got the information.
In fact, the chamber has decided and according to the report, I was not there, the chamber considers the facility-related
obligation to provide proof, i.e. the obligation to vaccinate doctors at least from November 7, 2022, to be unconstitutional.
At the moment, the declaration in court or the statement of grounds is still ongoing and
there is probably a so-called order for reference.
This means that the Federal Constitutional Court will now have to decide on precisely this period. More details later.
Will the Federal Constitutional Court hold those responsible to account and name the injustice that has occurred as such?
Kla.TV will follow the now pending decision of the Federal Constitutional Court with millions of citizens who
were put under massive pressure during the Corona period!
In the closing credits, explosive passages from the transcript of data analyst Tom Lausen's court hearing are shown.
NiUS has published the meaningful exchange of words between the presiding judge and RKI President Lars Schaade.