The coronavirus pandemic has become a distant memory for many people, and it seems
uninteresting to come to terms with what happened.
However, even people who were directly involved in the most important decisions regarding
lockdown and vaccinations admit that this is necessary,
one of them the German virologist and government advisor during the Covid19 pandemic, Christian Drosten.
But his views on reprocessing look a little worrying.
These should therefore be examined more closely.
At the World Health Summit 2023, Drosten said that a review of the coronavirus pandemic was
necessary, but only on the basis of scientific facts.
According to Drosten, there was one death in every family during the first wave.
He also demanded that the reappraisal should only take place with a selection of "reliable" scientists,
as the sovereignty of opinion must be consolidated.
Did they just mishear you?
So the coronavirus reappraisal is about consolidating the sovereignty of opinion
through scientists selected by politicians?
In other words, by scientists who reliably present only the goals and opinions of politicians to the public as science?
Why can't facts be researched in an open discourse between different scientists, but must be
enforced by the sovereignty of opinion and censorship?
In reality and in contradiction to policy, the facts are as follows:
The large number of deaths predicted due to corona did not materialize.
Instead, however, the coronavirus vaccinations sometimes resulted in severe side effects, including death.
And to this day, the damage caused by genetic treatments continues to develop, which is
why the full extent cannot yet be determined.
The collection and development of these side effects can be followed on vetopedia.org.
The program also shows a dramatic decline in birth rates in numerous countries in
connection with the start of genetic treatment.
In addition, the manufacturers of the preparations were aware of the side effects of infertility and miscarriages.
However, these real facts are largely swept under the carpet by politicians and the leading media.
At the World Health Summit 2023, Christian Drosten made it a condition for the reappraisal that no
guilty parties should emerge from the reappraisal.
So he wants to sweep all the crimes under the carpet at the same time.
However, the released RKI protocols, the aforementioned victims of vaccination side effects, as well as the German politicians
and judges accused by lawyer Ralf Ludwig - almost 600 in number - who are accused of crimes during the Corona
period, suggest anything but a guilt-free reappraisal.
You can find more details on the RKI protocols in this program.
Which brings us to the next question:
Does Drosten have a guilty conscience or even fear of a lawful conviction in the event of a proper investigation?
And is Health Minister Karl Lauterbach obviously too?
At the World Health Summit 2023, he warned that we are now in a more difficult situation in
terms of disinformation than before the pandemic:
"The misinformation pandemic that is now widespread is a permanent pandemic."
Furthermore, the former health minister Jens Spahn, who is obviously also very worried, said in an NTV
interview that a possible corona investigation must not end in a "lateral thinking court".
Such developments then prompted Ursula von der Leyen to make an almost panic-stricken adjustment to her priorities for
the next two years at the World Economic Forum 2024 in Davos.
She put the fight against disinformation first and said that the planned priorities of climate
and wars must therefore be put on the back burner.
As if he knew what could be in store for him, Christian Drosten demanded that the coronavirus response
should only take place under the protection of a select, global network of truth-keepers.
And as if EU leaders saw the end coming, last year the EU passed the Digital Services Act (DSA), which
forces information platforms to impose censorship.
This means that the EU elite is in control of opinion.
The Digital Services Act (DDG) being discussed in the German Bundestag was also described by Beatrix von Storch,
a member of the AFD, in the German Bundestag as a censorship monster that has no place in a democracy.
Do politicians and virologists, who were in charge of the Covid pandemic, now have no choice but to introduce
censorship laws with high fines in order to protect themselves from a proper investigation?
The dictatorial elite is obviously more afraid of a truthful reappraisal of the coronavirus than the devil is of holy water.
Ultimately, this makes it clear that a transparent and unbiased investigation into the events is essential.