In Germany, children are systematically forcibly separated or isolated from their mothers or fathers by
family courts and youth welfare offices under false pretenses, and sometimes even abducted by force.
In order to give those affected a voice, the association "AXION Resist" organized a press symposium on 3 May
this year with the topic: "Target child and attachment".
Did you know that 80-90,000 children are taken away from their parents in Germany every year, often irrevocably?
Did you know that refugee children have become a popular target of the youth welfare offices, while their parents, with no
knowledge of the language or the law, have to look on helplessly?
Did you know that the German Federal Center for Health Education (BZgA) has developed "Standards for the sexual education of
children in Europe" together with the WHO? And that this is already shamelessly preparing them for pedophilia attacks?
Child welfare and protection concepts are terms that can no longer be invoked quite so freely these days.
On the contrary, more than ever before, they demand an examination of how they are used.
If body exploration rooms in daycare centers are to serve the prevention of abuse, early childhood education about
multisexuality is to promote tolerance, military exercises in schools are to serve the spirit of peace, then
a real counter-education is urgently needed, which begins today with the AxionResist symposium.
To this day, the mainstream media only presents the issue in a striking way at times
when well-behaved citizens are already asleep.
But here you need to keep your eyes open!
Every year we celebrate World Children's Day on September 2, when we are all very happy and the ministry
proclaims wonderful slogans and always repeats the same phrases.
The reality of life is dramatically different from what our supreme courts and the European courts proclaim.
The state is obliged to create regulations that are suitable for the development of family ties
and must take measures to enable cohabitation.
What we are experiencing are measures that dissolve and destroy the family bond.
A society that ignores and fights against motherly love degenerates, degenerates, brutalizes and stultifies, and
that is exactly what we are unfortunately seeing in Germany.
The word "best interests of the child" keeps cropping up here.
When we hear this word, we have to cringe, because when we talk about the "best interests of the
child", the opposite usually ends up being the case.
The aim is to cause maximum harm to the child.
Children are defenceless and can endure a lot.
These are typical statements by Dr. Andrea Christidis.
So all this supposed child protection, I've already talked about the SOS Children's Villages.
There is an investigation report on the Internet, which I have also made available as a link below.
160 children have been sexually abused, raped and even impregnated in SOS Children's Villages and have then undergone abortions.
And the SOS Children's Villages are still asking for donations, which really makes me sick, I have to say.
We have to get away from always believing that the state always wants something good for us.
The state usually doesn't want anything good for us, because it really only wants our best, as
you know, and that is our money and our children.
This classic case from 2018 of years of sexual abuse on a campsite, in a rotten property with a caravan, children were
taken by the youth welfare office to a foster father, and he sexually abused the children there,
and the youth welfare office provided fresh meat.
That is an absurdity.
The parliamentary committee of inquiry has now begun in March, and I am very excited to see what comes out of it, because
the responsibility of youth welfare offices, judges, family judges and social society is becoming abundantly clear here.
In family law, there is no application for bias against employees of the Youth Welfare Office or against a guardian ad litem.
So it is said that they always work correctly, they are untouchable.
Child exemptions do not offer child protection, in the fewest, in the rarest cases.
The studies by Dr. Helmut Kentler, who worked with youth welfare offices throughout Germany for over 30 years to
place children with pedocriminals, have already been mentioned.
They used to be youth welfare office employees, they are now managers and they are still working in the youth welfare offices.
And the names of the Kentler studies, which the investigators, i.e. the researchers, have
criticized very strongly, are being kept under wraps.
This means that people are allowed to do this with the consent of our state, otherwise these names would be made public.
Ladies and gentlemen, over many, many decades, this evil spirit has trained many lodges and governesses
at universities, institutes and who knows what else.
And all those who are there today and parrot the same thing are all carved from this spirit.
I'm not surprised.
I am surprised that the University of Bielefeld has at least made it clear that the whole thing is criminal and nothing else.
And it did so in two expert opinions.
This is a pedosexual network across scientific institutions.
It's not just Berlin, mind you, it's not just Berlin.
And these are also the parties, in particular the Green Party, which called for the decriminalization of paedosexuality.
We are currently sacrificing our children for fantasies, for sexual perversions, for medical errors.
What we have now is an Alpha generation that is over 70 percent psychologically burdened thanks
to the coronavirus period we had to go through
and thanks to decisions by our politicians to put children behind masks for eight hours, to impose lockdowns on children,
to impose distance learning and social isolation on children.
This was certainly not a sign of the state's respect for the child's welfare.
That was contempt for the welfare of the child.
We can therefore see that not much has remained of the original natural law approach, the primary duty
of parents to care for and educate their children.
The guardian state intervenes massively in this relationship.
Corona terminus.
Here we have clearly seen the overlapping of the guardian state into the legal sphere of
children and parents to the point of excess.
And it must be clear to us what has happened here.
The last four years have seen damage and killing on the altar of what is called health,
on the altar of a completely fanatical society that had run after a completely insane idol of state obedience and health.
The constitutional and legislative authorities have deliberately undermined parental rights.
There is nothing left of natural law.
For this reason, the state can again have unbridled access to the child at any time, forcing this
access through punitive measures against parents.
But parenthood and families are pre-existent.
They already existed before the state.
Therefore, the state has no higher rights towards children than their parents themselves.
The state's support for children must therefore be limited to emergencies and the creation of a child-friendly environment.
It is crystal clear and perfectly understandable that there is an elementary vital bond between child
and mother that no one is allowed to interfere with.
Foster parents are a wonderful thing when parents are no longer alive or when there really is a serious danger to children.
I would like to say that again now, because there are some really great foster parents.
But foster parents can never have a bond with a child.
You can have a good relationship.
But there is a difference.
I'll explain that now:
From the fourth month of pregnancy, cells are transferred between mother and child - i.e. the child receives cells from the mother
via the placenta and the umbilical cord into its own body, and vice versa, the mother receives cells from the child
into her body and they almost always remain there for life.
This is called microchimerism, which actually takes place.
Shortly before the birth, the density of oxytocin receptors - you don't have to remember - increases significantly,
which considerably strengthens the mother-child bond.
The mother-child bond is the closest that evolution has produced, demonstrable at the level of earthworms.
I would not rule out, of course not rule out, that there are successful adoptions.
I wouldn't rule out the possibility that there are same-sex couples who can somehow manage this in individual cases.
But to elevate this defective situation to the status of normality and, above all, to throw all the biology
that I have dedicated my life to here for decades onto the garbage dump, that's just not acceptable.
The most striking example of measures that then make a rigorous cut in this respect is the taking into care, the
removal of children from households or at least from the environment in which they normally live.
Despite these clear legal requirements, there are always, and perhaps regularly, one could say, cases in
which youth welfare offices and family courts criticize the taking into care of children.
It is criticized that in many cases children are taken from their families too quickly
without there being an acute risk situation.
This usually leads to traumatic experiences for the children concerned and naturally shakes
their trust in the youth welfare or help system.
It has been proven that our youth welfare offices know what they are doing, I would like to tell you that.
If they rip a child out of a family, they know that this child will be massively disturbed.
At some point, however, the youth welfare office was given such a position of power that it practically
brought the whole system to bear and took everything with it.
But as long as youth welfare offices have this power, they flush everything down the drain,
and the judges are also forced into action.
If they work against the youth welfare office, they can hardly hold out in principle.
So, and the main problem is the self-conviction and economic benefits of the profiteers.
I can tell you that this includes politicians, because politicians usually sit on the Youth Welfare Committee and have
a say in what happens there, as well as the authorities, namely the youth welfare offices and, above all, the home operators.
And they believe that child protection is best achieved outside the biological family.
And if children are then taken out preventively without any real evidence, then I consider it a crime.
As we have heard today, the Family Court does not hear cases in public.
Those involved could therefore believe what they like.
It never comes out.
And who of them likes to admit that they have been wrong for a long time?
Unfortunately, a system of lies is being launched.
Although family courts have a duty to ascertain the truth in accordance with 138 ZPO,
untrue factual allegations are not examined.
Imagine that.
There is generally no witness evidence in family courts.
This means that no witnesses are summoned to German family courts.
So if you say: "But he can confirm, I didn't do that", he won't be charged.
Children are our future.
Children are human beings who are the result of an intimate relationship between man
and woman and only between man and woman.
And the children alone are spiritually from creation in the center of divine expectation.
I fight for the welfare of our dear children because I love all children.
They are ingenious little people, created in the image of God.
I love the bright eyes, and I think kids need an available mom and dad to really succeed.
What can we do about it?
What can we do for the future?
Because in the end, all of us adults don't care.
The children suffer every day.
The children are destroyed every day.
What are we doing?
Where are our opportunities?
Because on June 9, for example, we have European elections.
What are we doing here?
That was my question, because it hurts
for us as adults, for parents and ultimately for the children.
We will start making video documentation with those affected as early as this month from June 2024 and will publish documents
so that we can show evidence and not be seen as fibbers.
It is highly interesting how courts act and it is understandable that they fear, like the devil fears holy water, that
their nonsensical, unlawful actions are documented in this way.
The names of the perpetrators must be named.
We already had it earlier.
The names of the experts must be stated.
The names of the judges must be given.
Yes, we need to raise awareness, of course, and we all need to network.
That is the main point,
and we simply must not have so many chiefs everywhere, but everyone must be able to work together and not
everyone must think that I am much better than the others.
That is a huge problem.
Those with a lot of money have recognized that for a long time and that's what they do.
But the small associations and such, they all want to be a chief somehow.
It's like in the parties.
Everyone wants their job, no matter how good they are.
I just wanted to say it very briefly.
Reappraisal is necessary.
Rehabilitation of the victims of this policy is necessary.
The perpetrators need to be punished.
New excesses must be prevented through massive education, especially among the population, who know nothing at all.
Doctors, school staff, administrators, judges, public prosecutors and the police must be made independent,
and independent institutions must be set up to check the opinions spread by politicians.
And we must stand up to this, we must not let our children go through fire for these idols.