To mark the 5th anniversary of the assassination attempt on Walter Lübcke on June 2, 2019, we are showing
excerpts from our documentary "Tiefer Staat" (www.kla.tv/16518)
This still very topical documentary aims to raise awareness of the fact that politics, media campaigns and even assassinations
appear to be neither random nor arbitrary, but - according to well-founded research -
almost seamlessly follow a preconceived agenda.
With reference to the Lübcke murder case, politicians and the leading media are currently warning of an allegedly drastic rise
in hatred and hate speech and of a supposed increase in right-wing radicalism, which is also said to
be coming increasingly from parties such as the AfD.
However, the carefully researched facts in the following short version of the Kla.TV documentary "Deep State"
show that a critical and discerning eye is required to grasp the real connections and backgrounds.
NSU involvement
Terror as an instrument
Centuries-old secret plans
Lübcke murder case
What is the Deep State?
The "Deep State"
After the murder of German CDU politician Dr. Walter Lübcke at the beginning of June 2019, reports
about the background to the murder went on for weeks.
The motive for the crime is "hatred from the right", which Lübcke is said to have incurred as a result of a
statement he made in 2015 at the height of the refugee crisis.
The leading media immediately conveyed a fixed image: "Right-wing terror is the number 1 danger".
In the 1980s, left-wing terrorism was still referred to as "public enemy no. 1".
How did the public view turn 180°?
Are the enemy images of "right-wing terrorism" and "left-wing terrorism" possibly intended to distract attention
from completely different forces that are torpedoing the rule of law and democracy in the background?
In this context, the renowned Swiss historian and peace researcher Dr. Daniele Ganser speaks of the so-called
"Deep State", which has infiltrated democratic structures worldwide with covert warfare and false flag operations.
What is the "deep state"?
Since the 1970s, the term "deep state" has been used to describe power and decision-making structures in secret
services, the military, politics and the judiciary that are not democratically legitimized.
Since the 1990s, globally active networks have been exposed that covertly pursue the interests of a secret power elite.
No matter which political party is currently in power, under the guise of democracy, the realization of long-standing
plans has been and is being driven forward unnoticed.
The aim is to expand power and accumulate money among the globally dominant families (e.g. Rothschilds, Rockefellers).
Deep State - Example 1: Involvement of German state organs in the NSU case
Between 2000 and 2006, the so-called "kebab murders" were committed, for which the right-wing terrorist cell
"National Socialist Underground" - NSU for short - led by Beate Zschäpe was held exclusively responsible.
Various investigative journalists, such as Jürgen Elsässer, investigated the case by
analyzing court transcripts, among other things.
It came to light that state bodies, such as the Thuringian Office for the Protection of the
Constitution, were involved in the NSU case.
Andreas Temme, for example, was demonstrably involved in setting up the NSU network and, directly or indirectly, in
the execution of the aforementioned kebab murders, but this was never thoroughly investigated in court.
The Thuringian Office for the Protection of the Constitution has been proven to have been significantly involved in the financing
and development of the right-wing network surrounding the NSU.
There was also a mysterious death of witnesses in the NSU environment.
The fact that 19 files relating to the NSU case were destroyed and the remaining files were
initially blocked for 120 years is particularly explosive.
This vesting period was subsequently shortened to 2044.
Is the German state trying to cover up its involvement in the NSU affair?
Deep State - Example 2: Lübcke murder case: "Deep State" in action?
Since the assassination of CDU politician and Kassel district president Dr. Walter Lübcke, reports and commentaries on
the background to this murder have been coming thick and fast.
According to official statements, Lübcke was killed by a shot to the head on the terrace of his property on the night of June 2.
The perpetrator is said to be a right-wing extremist named Stephan E.
A possible motive for the crime is "hatred from the right", which the politician is said to have incurred as a
result of a statement he made at the height of the refugee crisis, among other things.
Although the investigations have not yet allowed any clear conclusions to be drawn, the media headlines already convey a
ready-made picture: "Right-wing terror is the number one danger".
There is no doubt that actual terror motivated by hatred by right-wing or left-wing extremists must be condemned and punished
in the strongest possible terms, without question or reservation.
But can Walter Lübcke's violent death really be clearly and exclusively attributed to a right-wing extremist background?
At least some of the connections raise weighty questions:
1. the dead Walter Lübcke was found by his son, who did not call the emergency doctor, but a paramedic friend
from the fairground party taking place just opposite.
As it turned out, he manipulated the crime scene by removing blood and possibly other traces.
The emergency services arrived much later and took Walter Lübcke with them, although the bullet hole in
his head was reportedly only discovered in hospital.
2. former constitution protection officer Andreas Temme, who had already played a dubious role in the murders committed by the
right-wing NSU network - the National Socialist Underground - between 2000 and 2006,
later moved to Walter Lübcke's government agency.
Temme was demonstrably involved directly or indirectly in setting up the NSU network and carrying out the murders.
The series of murders of ten predominantly Turkish victims was attributed exclusively to the right-wing network.
A real investigation into the murders was massively obstructed by the state.
At the end of 2011, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution destroyed at least 19 of the explosive
files, and the remaining ones have been blocked for 120 years.
Around the NSU trial, there was a conspicuous death of over a dozen witnesses.
It is noteworthy that in the Lübcke murder case, one of Temme's undercover agents is once
again closely connected to the accused Stephan E..
3. in 2015, the NSU committee of inquiry was provided with files containing "a classified document with relevant
information" on Stephan E., a suspect in the Lübcke case.
As reported by Hessischer Rundfunk, however, the State Office for the Protection of the Constitution no longer has a personal
file on the alleged murderer of the Kassel district president.
The facts are therefore anything but clear. Nevertheless, the investigation is exclusively against the "right".
But what other possible motives are there in the Lübcke murder case?
1 Lübcke's regional council issues permits for wind turbines, among other things.
During Lübcke's time in office, there were repeated conflicts over these approvals, partly because Lübcke's sons
are themselves operators of several wind and solar parks.
As district president, Lübcke was very "committed" to approving wind turbines, including in important nature
conservation areas, which sometimes led to angry protests.
2. An act of bloodshed by the Calabrian Mafia Ndrangheta is also conceivable. It has been active in Kassel for years.
The Ndrangheta has been proven to launder billions in money from drug, arms, red light and betting office
transactions, primarily via wind turbines, which is why a nationwide raid was carried out in 2013.
In summary, various investigative platforms have come to the conclusion that the facts of the Lübcke
murder case are extremely unclear and even contradictory.
Nevertheless, so far only "right-wing extremists" have been blamed for the murder and
politicians have already drawn the consequences.
Federal Minister of the Interior Horst Seehofer wants to significantly strengthen
the "fight against right-wing extremism"...
However, headlines like these leave no doubt as to which direction these consequences are actually heading:
The FAZ of June 19: "Murder of Walter Lübcke - CDU assigns co-responsibility to AfD"
or ZEIT ONLINE: "Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer blames AfD for the death of Walter Lübcke".
The SPD's budget policy spokesman Johannes Kahrs calls on Twitter: "... ban the AfD, then
dismiss AfD members from civil servant positions."
These statements tie in with the AfD's critical stance on the German government's migration policy, which is
equated in a completely undifferentiated way with xenophobia, which formed the breeding ground for this murder.
Media productions such as the NSU murders and the Lübcke murder, which have been blown up into a "major threat from the right",
are clearly intended to justify censorship, surveillance, sanctions and bans on parties such as the AfD,
educational movements and free media, and even the exclusion of critics of the system from society.