Below you can see a program about: Incorrect expert opinions
Violent child abduction
Staying at home and its consequences
Taking children into care - big business
Overload in youth welfare offices
Open door for child trafficking
In 2022, over 66,000 children and young people were taken into care in Germany.
They were transferred to state care and placed in foster families or homes.
These included 28,600 unaccompanied refugee minors.
For years, these figures have generally risen or remained similarly high.
Germany is the country with the highest number of children taken into care internationally.
Does Germany really have the most dangerous and incompetent parents in the world or is there something
else entirely behind these alarmingly high figures?
This program sheds light on the darkness and takes a close look at the system behind taking children into care.
In most of the 66,000 cases, the reasons for child abduction are not violence, neglect or
alcohol or drug addiction on the part of the parents.
Most of the children are taken into care because their parents are allegedly overburdened.
Other reasons are attachment disorders between parents and child, attachment intolerance of one parent or - get this - in
many cases a too close relationship between mother and child.
In these cases, the child often simply has a good and harmonious relationship with the mother.
Faulty expert reports
Psychological court reports on the legal guardians are often drawn up in the course of taking them into care.
These reports are an important basis for the family court judges responsible, and depending on how they
turn out, the further fate of the children is decided.
These expert opinions always cause great damage, as they lead to massive interference in the family.
They are also expensive for those affected.
They can cost the parents up to 15,000 euros and, if they are unable to pay, the taxpayer.
In total, several 100 million euros are earned annually.
These appraisals often contain glaring deficiencies.
Dr. Andrea Christidis, psychologist, expert witness, forensic psychologist and behavioral therapist, who
has written over 1000 expert reports on family assessments, makes the following statement:
I have never had a single expert opinion that really met all the technical requirements.
It found serious deficiencies in almost all of them.
In many cases, the parents or parents concerned were diagnosed by the experts after brief
conversations, sometimes only after telephone conversations.
Dr. Christidis explains this:
Unfortunately, the current legal situation is such that anyone who is appointed by a judge can prepare an expert opinion.
Whether he can do it is another question.
If the judge says: Yes, he's good at it, I think he's competent, then he can issue an expert opinion.
It is often noted that even trained psychologists often work unscientifically.
For example, the Rohrschach blot test is used with the children.
There they see blobs of ink and have to describe what they recognize in them.
Such tests are completely unsuitable as evidence in court and yet are cited as the basis for a decision on the child's welfare.
Dr. Christidis says:
You can put whatever you want into it. You are simply free.
It depends on the psyche of the assessor, what he sees in it and not necessarily what the child sees.
Any result desired by the expert can be diagnosed on this unscientific and highly controversial basis.
In most cases, the consequences are fatal.
Parents are often diagnosed with a lack of parenting skills or personality disorders in the reports.
These are then the reasons for the loss of custody and the placement of the children in foster families or homes.
Most people are not aware of these facts.
All these procedures are not accessible to the public and almost nobody has access to these processes.
Violent child abduction and its consequences
What the issuing of these inadequate and often exaggerated and erroneous reports can mean in practice for the
families concerned is shown below using case studies.
The following scenes can be very disturbing.
However, many children and their parents experience this cruelty first-hand.
We therefore ask you not to look away and to confront the suffering of children and families.
Children are weak and helpless, they have no lobby and are not heard by anyone.
Unless each and every one of us looks and takes action against this injustice.
In the following case, the mother is accused of alienating her son from the child's father because the boy
himself said that he did not want to visit his father.
The mother was then diagnosed with a personality disorder on the basis of an erroneous
expert opinion and her custody was revoked.
Although the 4-year-old boy was lying in bed with a fever, he was snatched away from his mother.
The grandparents were present that day and filmed the scene with their cell phones.
And the daughter was at work and then the bell went and then the youth welfare office and
the child's father stormed into the hallway.
And a foot was put in the door.
And they then made a decision and Elias was to be taken into care and move in with his father.
And the daughter came home from work straight away.
And a short time later the bell went off again and the bailiff came.
And then the bailiff asked Elias: Your dad is at the door, he wants to take you with him now.
And then he started crying and said: No, I don't want to go there.
And then the bailiff left again and said that Elias should stay here for now and get better.
And then five or six officers, I can't even say exactly now, came and stood around the bed where the
daughter was lying with Elias and wanted to take him away.
My wife and I then had the presence of mind to simply pull out our cell phones and hold them up to document something.
Ouch, ouch, ouch. I just want to talk to the father of the child.
Can we get a jacket and shoes for the child? Please? Jacket and shoes for the child!
Would you like to get this?
Come here, Steffi. Come here. At least say goodbye.
Say goodbye once. Say goodbye once. Say goodbye once. Let go of the door. Let go of the door.
How long have you not seen your son then?
Yes, then there were four months in which I didn't see him at all.
In the next case, the mother was falsely accused of having a personality disorder on the basis of an
inadequate expert opinion and thus deprived of custody.
Her daughter films how, at half past five in the morning, employees of the youth welfare office stand
in front of the door accompanied by the police and take her 7-year-old son away by force.
Yes, and if we say that our brother doesn't want to go out, doesn't want to leave, then ... I don't want to!
Just because someone claims something that isn't true ...
I don't want this! I don't want to go!
But you can't accuse me of doing anything bad.
Something really bad. Children are starving to death somewhere and nothing happens.
My child is well cared for and will be taken out of here.
No, but if I don't want to. I don't want to!
But I don't want to go!
I still can't get that screaming from my son out of my ears when they dragged him down the stairs.
And the neighbor across the street noticed everything.
She had seen him trying to cling to the door frame when the police dragged him away.
And then this policeman, a very strong man, twisted my little seven-year-old son's arms and pulled him away from me.
And then threw herself over his shoulder and left with him.
And my son screamed and screamed and screamed and screamed.
And you can't get that out of your ears.
You might think that these are just isolated cases and the absolute exception.
Unfortunately, however, many parents and children report such brutal incidents.
The consequences of these traumatic experiences often remain unresolved for a lifetime.
Anxiety, panic attacks and attachment disorders are just a small selection of the consequences that children and families
usually have to struggle with for the rest of their lives.
Here are two case studies to illustrate this:
When I came back, I was very afraid that at some point I would just find two people or men
standing there who would just take me away again.
I then accompanied him to school for six months, I sat next to him and yes, I actually did everything you can
imagine to accompany the child and take away his fear.
Paul was only two when he was taken from the family.
He stopped speaking and still has speech problems today.
Many children also suffer from the trauma of being torn away from their familiar surroundings.
This leads irretrievably to deep injuries and behavioral changes in the children.
If the parents are then allowed to visit the children, these visits usually take place under supervision.
Strict rules apply to the meetings, which are usually very rare.
The parents are not allowed to show any feelings or talk about their shared past.
If the rules are broken, visits will be banned altogether.
Staying at home and its consequences
While it is supposed to be about the children's well-being, in most cases, a stay in a home
dramatically worsens the children's situation.
Residential care often has serious consequences for children and young people.
Wakia is another example of this.
What have over three years in the home done to the cheerful Wakia?
It has changed me quite a bit.
No matter how nice someone you've just met is, you still shouldn't really trust them.
That's what I learned from it.
Dr. Christidis explains that this is not an isolated case:
So in... very briefly: children are not helped at all in institutions.
This can only be the case with children who have actually been severely abused and where forensic medicine
has clearly established serious injuries in children:
Sexual abuse - no matter what - yes?
But the - there are entire studies - the children's homes, e.g. Catholic children's homes or
diaconal organizations, are public on the net.
I've downloaded a few who have noticed for themselves that before - or teenagers then later - before they come
out, almost 90% of the children are damaged in some way.
They are either drug addicts, alcoholics or criminals.
They don't get any proper qualifications, none, not even a proper job qualification, so they often end up
paying the state afterwards because they are in, in what ...
What is done with the children in the children's homes?
They are stored.
They have a staffing ratio that makes you cry - yes?
So savings are being made there too, everything is privatized.
They all just want to make a profit.
So the children are put aside and are not encouraged.
It's all nonsense what they say.
Custody - big business
121,000 children were living in care in 2022 and around 86,000 children in foster families.
Accommodation in the home costs €42, 000 - €54,000 per child for one year.
For taking in a foster child, families receive a monthly care allowance of €700 to €900 depending on the age of the child.
Taxpayers pay €4.9 billion a year for these measures.
The following excerpt from a conversation with an employee who has been working in youth
welfare for decades illustrates the situation.
The inpatient area is the area that brings in the most money.
I mean, at the end of the day, you can see that inpatient facilities are becoming more and more widespread over the years.
Those who throw the children onto the market, so to speak, are the youth welfare offices.
Throw it on the market?
I'm saying this quite deliberately:
Throw it on the market! Because that's the way it is: it's about money, it's about money.
And if I am offered a young person by the youth welfare office for a certain daily or monthly rate, then I make an
offer to the youth welfare office, and the youth welfare office says whether I accept this offer or not.
It's a business after all.
And the youth welfare offices are ultimately happy if they have an agency that takes the young people off their hands.
How the children are doing in the facilities and whether the measures taken there are sensible and helpful for the children is
often not sufficiently checked by the youth welfare office staff.
Scandals repeatedly came to light about children from Germany being handed over to foster families and homes abroad.
They did not go to school there and their other activities were not monitored or supervised.
In this case, the financial aspect takes precedence over the child's welfare.
A facility receives up to €5,000 per month for the child from the Youth Welfare Office.
If the facility sends the child to a foster family in Poland, for example, only €600 per month has to be paid for this.
What happens to the rest of the money is often not checked.
Overload in youth welfare offices
There is also a shortage of staff in most youth welfare offices and employees are constantly overworked.
So there is a lack of time and staff to monitor the whereabouts and welfare of the children.
Many social workers are quitting their jobs because they can no longer support the way work is done.
A youth welfare office employee from Berlin:
It's just that people no longer want to stay here and no longer want to work under the working conditions,
colleagues are leaving who are just too busy and say:
No, for me that's no longer social work in the sense that I want to do it - and then go somewhere else.
This exacerbates the plight.
The question also remains as to who will do the work there.
Dr. Christidis, who has been dealing with unlawful custody for years and has personally handled many cases, comments as follows:
And the administration, i.e. the youth welfare office staff, I would say that they are merely executives.
And you don't need to think that there are psychologists or social education workers in there,
as there used to be, sometimes occasionally.
We sometimes have an educator, we sometimes have a motologist, who is responsible for movement therapy or something like that.
People who have no idea at all - some of them. Also university dropouts; en masse really.
In other words, they have no expertise, they only have official competence, yes?
They get money for doing this.
This staff shortage also means that the safety and thus the welfare of children who are in existential need due
to abuse, neglect or violence can no longer be guaranteed.
This clearly shows that the state, which has been aware of these abuses for years, is not
concerned about the children and their welfare.
In view of the tight budget situation, the social sector is now also threatened with funding cuts amounting to millions.
The following must be emphasized at this point:
There are many youth welfare workers and educators in the homes who like their job and are committed.
They are kind-hearted and focus on the children and their well-being.
However, as explained in detail above, it is becoming increasingly impossible for them to carry out their work
conscientiously and with the necessary care and attention.
Open door for child trafficking*
Another aspect that is only briefly outlined here is child trafficking.
In this opaque and barely monitored system, it is easy to make children disappear unnoticed.
This is proven to happen to thousands of children every year.
These children can be held captive in child brothels and also used for ritual abuse.
In the institutions and homes, the children are often at the mercy of the caregivers and completely dependent.
This opens the door to abuse and many scandals have already come to light.
It became clear that high-ranking politicians, judges, police officers and social workers were often involved in child abuse.
See other previously published Kla.TV programs on this topic, which are listed in the credits below the program.
Conclusion It became clear that children are traumatized and damaged for life as a result
of child abduction by youth welfare offices.
In many cases, it is about profit and the child as a commodity and not about protecting it and keeping it safe from harm.
The system covers up and encourages this abuse.
Ms. Christidis explains this as follows:
Is this about education being taken over by the state?
Are parents being deprived of all their rights?
Back in 2002, Olaf Scholz told the newspaper Die Welt: We want to conquer air sovereignty over the children's beds.
And shortly afterwards he had said: We have, the SPD has already raised the air sovereignty over the cribs.
In plain language, this means that the state has as much influence as possible on the upbringing of children.
Parental rights are disregarded and the family is interfered with from outside.
This is in line with the gender agenda adopted by the UN.
One of the aims here is to abolish the rights of parents over their children in order to enforce a global
family and social model based on the same principles.
Because according to gender ideology, responsibility for the upbringing and welfare of children does not primarily
belong to the family, but to the state and its institutions, schools, youth homes, boarding schools, etc.
Despite all the scandals and facts that keep leaking out in relation to child abduction, child theft and child trafficking,
there are no well-founded investigations and revelations down to the ground on the part of the so-called constitutional state.
The public media are also largely silent and neither publicize the scandals on a large scale nor do
they demand accountability from the perpetrators.
Explosive and misleading reports were partially deleted from the media archives.
So what is the order of the day to stop this?
Numerous organizations, individuals such as committed doctors, psychologists and lawyers who campaign for children's
rights have a clear answer to this: public relations work.
These facts must be made public.
In December 2023, for example, the MWGFD e.V. held a press symposium on the topic of Institutional assaults on our children.
It is the wish of MWGFD and all those who care about the well-being of our children that this issue
is brought to the attention of all our fellow citizens every day like a red warning light.
This requires all of us to ensure that this information is disseminated on a large scale.
All judges, public prosecutors, teachers, educators and doctors in particular must be informed and called
upon to do their bit to drain this unspeakable swamp.
The conclusion must be: We need courageous people - the time for keeping quiet and ducking away is over - now everyone is needed.