What do you, dear viewers, know about weather manipulation?
Is this topic also controversial in your environment and often
dismissed as a conspiracy theory?
The following presentation by a doctor of natural sciences at the 2022 Summer WEFF
in Davos is very informative in this regard.
Philipp Zeller studied physics at ETH Zurich and holds a doctorate in natural sciences.
As a recreational pilot, Zeller has been studying the weather in detail for over three decades.
As time went on, he noticed more and more anomalies in the sky.
He began to carry out his own investigations and research.
In particular on the topics of SRM (Solar Radiation Management), SAI (Stratospheric
Aerosol Injection) and HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project).
A former university lecturer, Zeller worked in the field of patenting for a long time.
That's why he knows this area very well.
Through his research, he has found around 1,000 patents for weather manipulation
technologies - dating back to 1892.
The following presentation is not intended to stir up fear.
The manipulation of the weather happens with or without our knowledge.
Rather, the fact-oriented uncovering of facts is intended to counteract
the denial of these events and provide fact-based arguments.
Therefore, spread this video to ignorant but truth-seeking people.
Presentation by Philipp Zeller:
Summer WEFF22 Geoengineering: I would like to welcome everyone very warmly and thank Alec and all the other organizers
and also you very much for giving me this opportunity to speak here.
Until now, my presentations have
always been much longer than an hour, which means I've had to shorten them massively.
Then there was also the fact that the topic was health, which means that I also did
a bit of research outside the realm of physics, because I wanted to focus on health.
And I don't think I have to convince most of you that the weather is being manipulated and what is actually happening up there.
So, what's the deal with geoengineering and health?
As I said, I would like to give a non-exhaustive overview of a few government
documents and laws, about patents.
You don't just apply for patents for fun, they cost a lot of money.
And you also have to prove that they work, otherwise they will not be granted and published
research papers, not by myself, because, as I said, it should also show
the focus of health.
As I said, it's just an overview, I'm researching almost constantly.
I don't claim to be giving a scientific lecture here, in the sense of a scientific
conference, in terms of structure and so on, but as I
said, it is an overview.
And of course I can also be wrong, I can make mistakes or I can also quote something
that is perhaps on shaky ground, I would just like to say that up front.
So what is geoengineering anyway?
Ms. Weichelt mentioned chemtrails earlier.
I try not to mention this term because the term chemtrail always immediately puts you in the corner of conspiracy theorists,
even though the term itself was coined by the US Air Force in the 1970s. That's the funny thing about it.
Geoengineering is certainly the more neutral term and geoengineering mainly involves weather
manipulation, which is actually the most important thing, by releasing particles into
the atmosphere, but also by emitting electromagnetic waves into
the atmosphere at high power.
Then, of course, earth probing, it's about changing, engineering the earth, geo, the earth.
In other words, they are probing for cavities, oil deposits, gas, etc.
And you can actually, I almost didn't want to believe it at first, you
can actually artificially trigger earthquakes with these activities.
And finally, the earth's magnetic field can also be manipulated, especially with these aforementioned electromagnetic rays.
Why is geoengineering being done at all?
That actually goes back to the whole Cold War, which began directly after the Second World War.
It actually started earlier, at least with the effort to influence the weather
But large-scale geoengineering actually began after the Second World War.
And I would like to quote former US President Lyndon B. Johnson here.
He said at a conference in 1962, verbatim: Whoever controls the weather controls the world.
And these are the aspirations of these superpowers, above all the USA.
Incidentally, this speech is available on YouTube, you can find it and listen to it in its original wording.
In the past - the funny thing is, it is always denied that geoengineering
is done at all - but in the past there were many such projects.
I would like to mention a few very prominent people who are also publicly acknowledged today.
The Cumulus project, which led to a major flood disaster in the United Kingdom
in 1952, when clouds were inoculated in order to produce them artificially and make them rain.
There was a very dramatic flood disaster, 34 people died and
many houses were swept away.
Of course, there are even worse disasters, but
the connection was very obvious.
Of course, it was hushed up for many years until it really came to light.
Then the Stormfury project, which was from 1962 to 1971.
Attempts have been made to influence hurricanes with so-called inoculation, i.e. by spreading particles.
This is done much more professionally today than it was back then.
At that time, it was just a project, still being researched.
And then, probably most people are aware of Project Popeye, where large amounts
of rainfall were deliberately provoked during the Vietnam War in order to muddy and
prevent the Viet Cong's supply routes.
And finally, I would also like to remind you that there were over 2,000 atomic bomb tests.
So why is it necessary to retest such a devastating and polluting bomb so many times?
I mean, if you want to build it, and I'm already putting a question mark behind
it anyway, then two or three tests are enough, then you know how it works.
And you can still detect it today, in the water, in the soil and in the
atmosphere, all this radioactivity.
There are dozens, if not hundreds, of official documents, some of which have always been
publicly accessible, some of which were later declassified, especially in the USA,
so you can really spend hours researching and downloading them.
I would just like to show one of them briefly here, which is a weather
modification proposal before the US Congress.
It is a very comprehensive document with almost 200 pages.
And in there - I have translated it specially, it's from 1978 - and it says that in the
past 30 years, from 1947 to 1978 - I'm not talking about today, the past 30 years - 110
weather manipulation programs were presented to the US Congress and also approved.
In 1978, Congress then initiated and funded a national,
i.e. cross-national, research program.
The criticism at the time was that there was no national law in the USA
that would have regulated all of this.
They had to make do and they wanted to do something about it.
And of course people were already afraid back then, because they had already done it - in
Vietnam, for example - they were naturally afraid that the enemy could do the same, or that they
would suddenly be accused somehow as a nation if there was a storm somewhere or a drought, that
it could then be said: That was an attack, and of course they wanted to prevent it.
That's why it had to be regulated by law.
And as a result, in 1978 - i.e. initiated as early as 1976 -
and in 1978 a legislative resolution was introduced in New York.
The UN was behind this, i.e. the UN treaty banning the use of weather manipulation
in warfare or any environmentally damaging technology.
And this law has also been ratified by Switzerland, so many,
many countries around the world have ratified this law.
Switzerland 1988, that is, this has now been passed into federal law, which
you can look up in the Federal Collection of Laws, number 515.06.
This law actually sounds good, and as I said, the USA introduced it between 1976 and 1978 out of fear that its enemies might do the same.
Such a law does not mean that you have to abide by it.
It sounds very good, the first two main articles also sound very good, it's really
about the fact that this is forbidden.
But then there is the third article of this law, and this third article states
first of all that use for peaceful purposes is of course permitted.
However, it is not defined what peaceful purposes are.
And then there is a second sub-article in this Article 3, and it says
that the contracting states even undertake to support this:
knowledge exchange, to participate financially in it.
They do not have to actively participate, but they must support it and make a contribution.
And then there is the icing on the cake, because there is a so-called agreement on this Article 3, and it
says that it does not deal with the question of whether or not such an environmentally
modifying technology violates the applicable provisions of international law.
It reminds me a bit of a law that is to be introduced
to combat the pandemic.
You may be familiar with this, but we Swiss ratified it back in 1988.
That is actually frightening.
I will now go back to the USA and show you another document that was published, which
was a proposal to the U.S. Air Force for the outlook for the year 2025.
The document itself is from 1996, and the title of this document
is: Weather as a Force Multiplier.
And the subtitle is: We
own the weather until the year 2025.
A short excerpt from this document: on the left-hand side, so to speak, how to harm
the enemy, and on the right-hand side, how to support yourself and your partners.
Just a few keywords: damaging the enemy with rain, with tidal waves, which are also supposed to worsen the morale
of the soldiers - on the other side, so to speak.
But you can also provoke a drought, a water shortage, until people are
so badly off that they surrender.
You can provoke storms, you can manipulate the ionosphere - I'll come back to this later - in such a way
that the enemy can no longer establish radio communications, or with radars you can virtually
no longer see your own aircraft.
You can either let fog and clouds dissipate so that the enemy
cannot hide, or you can form them to surprise the enemy.
And you can also recognize whether or not the enemy itself is using such techniques.
And our own practices are virtually the exact opposite.
Yes, so if you have a large transport yourself, you make sure that there is no rain, that the
roads are dry, storms as required, also optimize the ionosphere if you need
radar signals yourself and need good radio connections, and so on.
In this document - it is still the same document - it still says, as a summary,
that once the conditions are in place, we must also be able to spread coal dust
- this document clearly states coal dust, and fine coal dust at that - in
the desired region, i.e. in the hostile region, in a controllable,
safe, cost-effective and reliable manner.
Methods have been evaluated, and it says that countless spraying techniques have already
been studied. The document is from 1996.
The safest and cheapest method is a type of afterburner for jet engines, i.e.
a spray device fitted behind the engine to inject this
carbon dust into the exhaust jet.
And while the aircraft is flying through this area, it is activated
or can be deactivated again.
Why coal dust?
That is exciting.
There is another document that was published under the Freedom of Information Act, FOIA, i.e. later.
This used to be a confidential, secret document.
This comes from the Philips laboratory of the head department for geophysics.
They have of course always advised the American government and also the military, etc.
It says how you can increase the rain, decrease the rain, increase cirrus clouds, so to
speak, these veil clouds that we now have all the time - they are simply
not natural, but we have them - or how you can dispel fog.
And the whole thing - this is basically just chapter four, I've just pulled it out - with
black carbon, weather modification with black carbon is clearly stated there.
I'll skip that. There are many, many such documents.
It is frightening what kind of weapons are being researched and tested.
I would like to briefly quote a book, a very exciting book.
I found it in the original - antiquarian.
This book is called Unless Peace Comes, i.e. unless we find peace,
which is of course to be hoped for.
This was edited by a Nigel Calder in 1968, so it's been a few years in the making.
And this Nigel Calder was a very influential and renowned science journalist.
And he has asked leading military advisors and top scientists to each contribute a
chapter to this book about their work, how they advise the government
and what research they conduct.
And the craziest or most exciting chapter in this book, there are
17 chapters, is called How we are destroying the environment.
That is the title of the chapter and this chapter was written by a Professor Gordon MacDonald, who is no longer alive, who was the head of geophysics
and planetary physics at the University of California in Los Angeles.
And he was a member of President Lyndon Johnson's advisory staff,
whom I have already quoted.
Excerpt from this chapter, the chapter is frightening to read and he writes what was
just done in 1968 in current research.
You can create cold clouds by forming ice crystals, you can create warm
clouds by artificially enlarging the existing droplets with particles.
You can create dry clouds that don't rain, which we've had a lot of these days.
You can increase the size of clouds around a thunderstorm in order to
change, strengthen or weaken the storm.
You can drop metal foils or metal particles - in his day they were still metal
foils - to generate more lightning.
In other words, lightning, which then also occurs without it actually raining, without it thundering.
We also know this well enough.
You can create hurricanes, you can prevent water surfaces from evaporating with
polymer layers so that there are no clouds, even if the temperature rises.
More water would actually evaporate.
You can change the global climate, and he writes that it does so naturally, and
so you can hide these activities well.
Nobody will notice whether it is natural or whether someone is behind it.
That's not all, I have a second page.
You can create ozone holes.
1968, just to do the math.
There's a great trick for carrying out a nuclear detonation, an underground nuclear detonation
test under the Antarctic ice sheet.
The Antarctic ice sheet is around 100 kilometers thick, which is an incredible amount of ice.
Then a film of water is produced by the heat under this layer of ice and
a large part of this ice will slide into the sea as if on a slide.
This could provoke a global ice age.
This is relatively simple.
You can blow up coastal strips and then trigger a tsunami.
I don't know who knew what a tsunami was in 1968.
I've only known about it since 2006, although I studied physics before that.
But I was not familiar with tsunamis.
Earthquakes can be generated by activating the water layer, which
is about 10 kilometers deep underground.
This is very close to the so-called triple point.
I don't want to go into the states of aggregation of water in
detail now, purely for reasons of time.
Close to the triple point means where the water is most dense, where it can go into transition relatively quickly,
into supercooled water or vapor form, etc.
When you hear that an earthquake had its epicenter at a depth of 10 kilometers,
you should always be alert.
What is exciting is that all the major disasters, such as Fukushima, where
the epicenter was 10 kilometers deep.
I can't prove anything, but it's an interesting coincidence.
You can redirect the jet stream.
I'll show that briefly later. For those who don't know what the jet stream is:
These are high winds about 10 kilometers high that go around the whole world.
You can trigger tornadoes.
I think I already had that on the previous page.
And then the quintessence of this book chapter by Professor MacDonald is that you
can recognize and exploit instabilities of the earth.
In other words, where something is always on the edge, you only have to put a little energy into it to
be able to steer it in one direction or another.
And finally, he also talks about mind control.
That electromagnetic waves can be used to exert mind control over humanity.
I believe that this is also increasingly coming to the surface, that this has actually
been intensively researched over decades.
There are also many patents in this area.
It's frightening what has already been done.
Especially in the MK-ULTRA program, for example.
After all, it is also used for good.
This is measured via EEG - electroencephalograms.
You measure what brain waves there are in which state.
And then you can sort of play it back and get people into very special states.
I won't go into this in detail, again purely for reasons of time.
It's a huge barrel, I can't open it all up.
In 1999, the Council of Europe drew up a 35-page report. A special commission of the Council of Europe.
This is about the so-called HAARP project.
With two A. This is called the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program.
This is called High Frequency Active Aurora, a northern lights research program.
This takes place in Alaska.
There are now such stations almost all over the world.
Of course, these are all research stations in quotation marks.
I'll come back to what it is later.
This is about manipulation systems for the ionosphere.
The ionosphere is a very high part of our atmosphere.
From about 80 kilometers and higher.
It is ionized because we constantly have electrical charges there that are
ionized and then deflected by the solar wind.
Up there, a current is constantly flowing through this plasma.
It's electric up there and of course you can manipulate things particularly well there.
The Council of Europe or the Commission writes that it is part of electromagnetic weapons and
represents a highly dangerous threat to the entire environment and, of course, to human health,
because the project aims to penetrate the highly sensitive energetic area
of the entire biosphere.
So not only in the ionosphere, but also down here.
It is an extremely dangerous activity.
There are now many such radio wave transmitting stations and they certainly
have an impact on the health of us all.
I have just come to this HAARP project and the basic patent for it.
This was granted in 1987.
The title is: Change of a region in the atmosphere,
ionosphere or magnetosphere.
The magnetosphere is even higher up than the ionosphere.
The ionosphere is our magnetic protective belt, which is directly connected to the Earth's magnetic field and is
directed around the world in a kind of torus shape.
In this respect, as I said at the beginning, you can manipulate the earth's magnetic field.
The patent says you can heat plasma.
This pushes it up and then there is a vacuum where it has risen.
When I heat air and it rises, I have a negative pressure at the bottom.
This provokes a horizontal movement, i.e. wind.
I can then also use this electromagnetic radiation to confuse,
deflect or even destroy a missile.
This is a weapon system.
This is the war of the stars that was propagated by the USA in the 1990s.
The same patent also states that the ozone or nitrogen concentration can be changed.
You can change the carbon dioxide concentration. Carbon monoxide - even more dangerous.
Nitrogen oxides and other substances can be concentrated or diluted
to manage environmental flows.
It also states that the earth's magnetic field can be reduced or even switched off.
The aim is of course to deflect missiles, but not only that.
And what's really crazy is that you can manipulate these plasmatic particles
that are high up in the atmosphere to form a lens, an optical lens, so that
you can focus a beam of sunlight onto a point on the Earth.
Many of you may have already tried to light tinder with a magnifying glass.
I did that a lot in my childhood.
This can then be done on a large scale.
Keyword forest fires or other fires or heat problems etc.
This is what this original antenna forest in Alaska looks like.
These are cross-diagonal antennas, i.e. typical radio antennas.
Frequencies from 30 kHz to 300 MHz can be generated with these antennas.
These are typical radio waves.
What I explained before looks something like this.
The upper part of the atmosphere is pushed to the height of the ionosphere.
This creates a negative pressure.
Then there is a horizontal movement and corresponding wind movement.
If you convert these frequencies that I mentioned earlier from HAARP to wavelength,
if you look at the Herz wave, then you get wavelengths between 10 m and 15 km. A
wave trough, a wave bulge, is half of this, i.e. 5 m to 7.5 km
When you see cloud formations like this, you have to ask yourself whether they are standing waves from
a foehn valley when you see them on the Central Plateau or even in southern Germany, or whether
there is something else behind them.
That's exactly what it looks like to me.
This is also from a research report from this HAARP research on how radio
waves can also be reflected at the ionosphere.
Because it is electrically conductive, it can be used as a mirror and can provide much better
radar surveillance and radio communication.
Here is also an excerpt from a research paper.
Here you can see that there are different conductive layers.
Naturally, you only have the ionosphere to guide you.
There are still conductive layers down here.
How do you achieve this?
By spreading conductive particles further down in the atmosphere.
They are very helpful in achieving certain effects with these HAARP waves.
Now I come across exactly these particles that are used there.
I bring you here once again with a patent. It's a very old patent, granted in 1966.
And to the US Navy, not to a private company, but to the state.
I would like to mention that at that time, according to American patent law, a patent could
be maintained for a maximum of 17 years.
But that costs a lot.
The older a patent gets, the more you have to pay to keep it protected.
So it was paid for the whole 17 years.
This patent, even though it is so old, I find it so relevant.
It stands as an example for dozens, if not hundreds of patents, a metallic mixture for generating hygroscopic smoke.
In other words, smoke that attracts water, attracts water vapor.
And since it says you need a metallic mixture, and it contains the
following, please note: Lithium, sodium,
potassium, caesium, rubidium, calcium, magnesium, strontium and barium carbonates
and also mixtures of these.
In addition, light metals such as aluminum, magnesium, zinc or zirconium or mixtures thereof.
Also an inorganic oxidizing agent such as nitrates, perchlorates, sodium, lithium,
potassium, calcium, barium and strontium.
And then, in addition, a polyhalogen compound, which I will come to later,
such as hexachloroetane or octachloropropane was patented, granted and maintained
for 17 years by the US Navy.
Another such patent that says you can deploy stratospheric Welsbach
particles to reduce global warming.
They were already on the climate change bandwagon back then, in 1991.
Welsbach was a researcher, hence the Welsbach particle.
This is one of the people who came up with the idea.
I'm only showing this because it says here that aluminum oxide or thorium oxide is best suited.
So aluminum has already been mentioned as one of the most common pollutants in the atmosphere today.
There are many patents, including one that says that sand-like
particles can be brought into the upper atmosphere.
It is relatively easy to convert a Boeing 737 to carry 25 tons of cargo to an altitude of 18,000 meters.
This patent was granted in 2018.
It also says that the particles remain so high up in the atmosphere for about two years.
I'll show you another one, I hope it's not too boring.
This is a patent of the company GelTech Solutions.
There are countless YouTube videos about this. They are called on the hunt for hurricanes.
They filmed from airplanes how they either strengthened or weakened hurricanes.
They have invented something really great, a polymer, i.e. a plastic compound.
It is sprayed into a cloud, the cloud dries out and then a gel falls from the sky.
This can also prevent rain.
And then back to the health aspect.
Another relatively new patent was granted in 2015 to some law firm.
This is usually a sign that the inventors or the real owners want to remain unknown.
It says here that this is a flying application system for toxic mosquitoes using
drones, i.e. unmanned aircraft.
If you look at the patent figures, you may not see
them so well here, I have zoomed in.
I didn't put that in, that's the patent figure there with the skull in the drone's cargo.
You hear and read more and more in the mainstream media about what is really being done.
But they always say it's not being done, we should, we should,
it's urgently needed because of climate change.
That's an even bigger scam than Corona, but I can't open that barrel either due to time constraints.
In any case, there is a very interesting book by Professor David Keith.
I don't recommend buying it, but if anyone is interested, I can provide excerpts.
I have it, A Case for Climate Engineering, so we have to do climate engineering.
In my eyes, he is currently the research leader for geoengineering, who of course always says that
it is not being done. We know exactly how to do it, but it's not being done.
They are all conspiracy theorists, he claims.
He describes in detail that he wants to bring together microparticles of 5 nanometers of aluminum oxide,
30 nanometers of metallic, i.e. pure aluminum and then 15 nanometers of barium titanate,
like a sandwich, because they would optimally reflect the sunlight back into space.
Then there is another book, which you may have already heard of, How we can prevent
the climate catastrophe by a certain Bill Gates. I certainly don't recommend buying it.
It simply says that this is a super worthwhile investment.
I won't say any more about that.
I will now turn to the effects on health, because that is the central issue.
So, fly ash. I had previously shown documents where coal dust was mentioned.
Fly ash as a risk factor for lung cancer.
This is a review article, i.e. an article that summarizes many research papers.
It appeared in the Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research.
It has been proven that aluminum silicates, iron oxide, magnetite, radionuclides, i.e.
radioactive nuclides, even alpha emitters, which are the most dangerous if you inhale them,
silicon, pure silicon is not healthy, arsenic, also known as poison, cadmium and chromium
are present, so that they can clearly cause increased lung cancer or increased oxidative
cell stress, cytotoxicity, i.e. cell toxicity, and genotoxicity, so that
they also alter the genome.
Asbestos is interesting, everyone knows it as a very toxic substance.
This is a fibrous silicate that also contains a lot of iron oxide in so-called bioavailable
form. You know what serious cases of lung cancer this has caused.
Another review study from 2019, also from the Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research,
exposure to iron oxide nanoparticles leads to heart disease, again because
oxidative stress occurs.
This article states that exposure to iron oxide can also lead to heart disease.
The authors of this study, a certain Marvin Herndon, who works very intensively on
this topic, together with colleagues, also write in this article that it is essential
to end geoengineering by spreading aerosols, especially fly ash, very fine
ash dust, in order not to destroy the entire biosphere.
By the way, this is one of the few pictures that I didn't take myself, it's by Lilian
Anselmetti from Aufrecht Bern. Many thanks for making it available.
I think they are incredible cloud images that she saw in the Bern area.
Another study from 2017 states that the contamination of the biosphere by mercury
is increasing massively and that this must also be a consequence of climate manipulation.
This was published in the Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International.
It was a study, not a review.
Mass spectrometry was used to measure rainwater and snow.
Extremely high mercury levels of 2 micrograms per gram were measured.
Although RoHS legislation has greatly reduced lead and mercury over the last
20 years, this pollution is increasing.
This also has health risks of a neurological, cardiovascular and urogenital nature.
It can cause infertility, affect the immune system and also damage DNA.
Another study I want to mention, from Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal,
is the redwoods, the sequoias in California, these redwood forests.
Some of them are over 3,000 years old. They experienced a much warmer climate than we claim or actually have today.
They have experienced incredible dry periods, wet periods, cold periods.
They are still alive and now they are all dying.
A closer examination of these shows that the artificial drought has been
caused over decades, in California over decades by geoengineering.
The toxic nanoparticles are clearly causing the trees to die.
The aluminum content in these nanoparticles in particular causes the trees to close the stomata, i.e. the stomata in the needles or leaves.
Then they no longer have the moisture exchange and can no longer absorb CO2.
Incidentally, CO2 is the gas of life par excellence.
There would be no green plants without CO2.
There is even a relatively new study from NASA that says that the earth has become greener
in the last 15 years. You write, probably because of the increased CO2.
What's wrong with that? But that's just a subordinate clause.
One very important factor is the hole in the ozone layer, which is getting bigger and bigger.
You don't hear anything more about it.
CFCs were already banned in the 1980s.
Now we can no longer be bullied with anything.
So we are not saying that the hole in the ozone layer is getting bigger and bigger.
We now know how it can be enlarged.
The US government has already admitted this itself in the many documents.
This hole in the ozone layer means that we can measure UVB and UVC on the earth's surface.
Mainstream science also admits that we have much higher levels of UVB and UVC. This
is the dangerous UV, from a wavelength of 100 nanometers to about 400 nanometers.
This is the really dangerous UV.
We didn't have that on the surface of the earth in the past.
This is coming down on us through the hole in the ozone layer.
This is of course just as dangerous for us humans as it is for these sequoias.
I'll skip the next few studies now, because it always leads to the same thing.
What all this triggers. Catastrophic bee mortality, insect mortality, all the algae problems.
These toxic algae blooms actually occur because the plankton dies.
All these nanoparticles and the hole in the ozone layer.
Bird populations are declining, also indirectly, because insects
are disappearing, as are bats.
These are all studies that I have read.
It's really frightening how all this affects the whole environment, not just our health.
Which could be an important driver of all these particle emissions.
To this day, I cannot say whether only airplanes are converted, as described in the patent, for the sole purpose of spraying.
B-77 with 25 tons of tanks. Or does every passenger jet also spray? I'm not sure.
I suspect, but that's just a guess, that both are being done in parallel.
The current NATO fuel Jet Propulsive 8, JP8, has an incredibly large number of dangerous additives.
NATO does not tell its member states what all these additives are.
They provide frost protection, explosion protection, good storage and temperature resistance.
It can be used in arctic regions as well as in the desert.
You can also use it to power a camping stove, a ship or an airplane. That needs additives without end.
There is a very good study by a Marion Hahn. You can also find them on the Internet.
She became ill herself because she lived near an air force base.
She can show pretty well that she must attribute this to the JP8.
Here you can see that I found dozens of military research documents from the US Air Force.
Here is an example of a research paper. I think it's from the 90s or 00s.
In any case, the fuel was examined here within the US Air Force.
Aluminum, barium, beryl, lead, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, iron, copper, molybdenum, sodium,
nickel, strontium, titanium, vanadium, zinc and tin were detected in this JP8.
And then, of course, there are the oxides of all these metals and also polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons such as naphthenes and alkyl-substituted naphthalene, all incredibly healthy additives.
And if you look at this NATO fuel now, it is military.
There is a pipeline system in Europe and this picture is from Wikipedia.
Everything I have written here is from Wikipedia. I don't usually quote Wikipedia, because most of it isn't true anyway.
But here is this picture from the 70s. Interestingly, they have not updated this.
And here you can see this pipeline system throughout Europe. Switzerland is not yet included here.
But the Wikipedia article states that 90% of the transported fuel
was already sold to civilian customers in 2009 - from this aviation fuel.
And the largest civilian customers include Frankfurt, Cologne, Bonn, Zurich and Munich airports.
NATO fuel for civil airliners.
In 2016, 12 million cubic meters were sold to civilian customers in Europe.
I said earlier that the mainstream is also publishing more and more articles on this topic
and then says, yes, that can't be right.
Another article that made the rounds in the mainstream two weeks ago was incredible.
Everywhere, including on SRF, Watson, in English-speaking
countries, etc. Nowhere on earth is rainwater of drinking water quality, they say.
Even in the Antarctic or in the highlands of Tibet, it is still 14 times higher than the limit set
by the US Environmental Protection Agency.
And above all it is about so-called PFAS and PFOA.
These are poly- and perfluorinated hydrocarbons, i.e. hydrocarbons containing fluoride.
The ones that are in make-up, shampoos, packaging and cleaning products -
and then of course in the mainstream.
So now we're to blame again.
But this Air Force study in particular said that there are fluorinated
compounds in it, and on a large scale.
So the worst thing about these fluorinated compounds comes from the top.
This is the original study that was quoted in the mainstream.
I then always look for the original studies.
I want to read what the researchers have done.
It is also interesting that the Tagesanzeiger quoted a researcher from Denmark.
Martin Scheringer from ETH Zurich is even involved.
Then perhaps I could contact him and ask whether they had also taken
atmospheric components into account.
I then did a bit more research and came across a book.
This is called "Forever Chemicals", i.e. chemicals that do not degrade and remain in the earth's circulation for a very long time.
It's mainly about these PFOA and PFAS, i.e. these perfluorinated
and polyfluorinated hydrocarbons.
It says that only four of them are actually known and have been examined to see how dangerous
and poisonous they are. And only these four can really be proven so well.
But there are 6,500 listed alone and there are probably over 10,000 of these substances.
I can see Alex is there, so I'll skip the rest now.
I would have liked to briefly mention that non-ionizing radiation and electromagnetic
fields can also cause genetic disruptions of an indirect nature.
But I know there's another speaker coming, so I can skip that with a clear conscience.
That it's not just the substances sprayed up there that pose a health risk,
but also all those radio waves and microwaves that are showering down on us.
And I'm just talking about these weather manipulation things.
I'll leave 5G and even 4G, 3G etc. out of the equation for now.
Yes, the last pictures I took myself in March and April.
You can't see it so well on the projector.
Really in the mountains, it looks like smog over Los Angeles.
That simply cannot be natural.
And I'm done with that.
I skipped a few things.
I hope I haven't overdone it too much.
Thank you very much for your attention.