Manipulation in the war in Yugoslavia.
Dear viewers, in the following documentary we report on the manipulation in the war in Yugoslavia.
Do flare-ups of popular unrest, as is currently the case in Macedonia or in Yugoslavia in the 1990s,
really arise spontaneously, i.e. out of popular dissatisfaction, as the leading media portray it?
Or is there an ingenious strategy devised by global strategists behind it?
Willy Wimmer - former Parliamentary State Secretary to the German Federal Minister of Defense - points out clear parallels
between today's conflicts and the war in Yugoslavia, which violated international law, in an interview on 24 March 2017.
He concludes: The government is lying to us through its teeth in the interests of NATO
What the German government has been doing since 1999 and the war against Yugoslavia: lying to
the German people from one conflict to the next.
Ladies and gentlemen, how did Willy Wimmer come to make such drastic statements?
To find out, we examine the strategies of the global chessboard players using the war in Yugoslavia as an example.
War pretext: alleged humanitarian catastrophe:
In March 1999, for the first time in 50 years, Germany took part in a war again, namely NATO's war of aggression
against the former Yugoslavia, which violated international law.
The NATO air force dropped 14,000 bombs on Yugoslavia.
In order to justify the war to the public, politicians claimed that there was a humanitarian catastrophe.
This could only be ended by a humanitarian war.
But Jochen Scholz, then a lieutenant colonel in the NATO air force and now a peace
activist, vehemently contradicted this account.
He found that the air war had already been planned in 1998. And this despite the fact that, according to
an OSCE report, there was no humanitarian disaster.
The OSCE is the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe
But why the war then? According to Scholz, the geographical location of Yugoslavia meant that EU
and NATO expansion to the east was on the agenda.
Norma Brown, US diplomat at the OSCE, put it in a nutshell:
The fact is, everyone knew that there would only be a humanitarian catastrophe when NATO bombed!
Election campaign deal Gerhard Schröder - Bill Clinton:
According to retired Lieutenant Colonel Jochen Scholz, Chancellor candidate Gerhard Schröder traveled to the USA in the
early summer of 1998 during his election campaign and spoke with US President Bill Clinton about Kosovo.
The planned war in Yugoslavia and Germany's military involvement under Schröder were addressed there.
According to Scholz, US campaign workers were then sent to Gerhard Schröder to help him win the election for Federal Chancellor.
A change of government became necessary because Helmut Kohl would not have agreed to Germany's involvement in the war.
War lies of the German ministers Scharping and Fischer:
The German government needed public acceptance to enter the war.
Defense Minister Scharping and Foreign Minister Fischer used a propaganda ploy to arouse them.
They associated the situation in Kosovo with Germany's Nazi past and thus hit the Germans right at their sore spot.
They lied to the public with atrocity stories about ethnic cleansing in Serbia and a concentration camp in Pristina.
On-site research by the journalists Angerer and Werth and the German general and OSCE employee
Heinz Loquai revealed that these were fictitious.
There was only fighting between the Yugoslav army and Albanian paramilitary units.
Nevertheless, through their war propaganda, Scharping and Fischer succeeded in getting the public to agree to
liberation from the atrocities of the Serbs through war.
NATO spokesman Jamie Shea said: If we had lost public opinion in Germany, we would have lost it throughout the alliance.
PR agencies prepared for war in former Yugoslavia:
The book Operation Balkan: Advertising for War and Death, by Jörg Becker and Mira Beham, shows how American PR agencies created
media-effective enemy images during the war in Yugoslavia.
The influential American company Ruder Finn, for example, worked for three! warring parties at the same time:
for the Croatian, Bosnian and Kosovo-Albanian leadership.
The brief was to portray the Serbs unilaterally as oppressors and aggressors, and the Croats, Bosnian
Muslims and Kosovo Albanians exclusively as victims.
The agency made the Western public ready for war with its Serbs are to blame propaganda.
Agency director James Harff. We were able to equate the Serbs with the Nazis.
Almost immediately afterwards, the media used a different language with terms such as ethnic cleansing,
concentration camps, etc., which are associated with images from Nazi Germany and Auschwitz.
No one could oppose it anymore without being accused of revisionism. We were one hundred percent successful.
The intervention of the US army in the Balkans was justified by the controlled escalation of the conflict.
War in former Yugoslavia fueled by US government:
Russia-friendly Yugoslavia was destabilized by the Western powers and broken up into the seven individual states of Slovenia,
Croatia, Bosnia, Serbia, Montenegro, Kosovo and Macedonia.
By stoking internal ethnic tensions, the various ethnic groups were led into ever new armed conflicts in the 1990s.
The ex-CIA agent, i.e. the foreign intelligence service of the USA, Robert Baer, said: The aim of the propaganda was to
divide the republics of Yugoslavia so that they would fall away from the mother country and become independent.
All we needed was a scapegoat to be blamed for everything, including war and violence. Serbia was chosen for this role...
The British officer John Crosland remarked: The international community supported the KLA.
US President Bill Clinton, US diplomat Richard Holbrooke and US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright had
decided that there would be a regime change in Serbia ...
The ongoing military conflicts between the ethnic groups ultimately provided the USA with a justification for the
NATO attack against Serbia, which violated international law, and the overthrow of President Slobodan Milošević.
The former CIA agent Robert Baer apologized to the people of Yugoslavia after the country was destroyed:
Forget the past, because it was staged and false. You were merely manipulated and you got what you wanted.
But you must not continue to harbor feelings of hatred towards each other because of this!
You have to show that you can get over it and understand who is actually to blame for this situation!
I would like to sincerely apologize to you!
Change of government in Yugoslavia co-financed by the US State Department:
The change of government in Yugoslavia in 2000 is one of many examples of how the US State Department is involved
in changes and overthrows of government via so-called NGOs.
The student movement Otpor, founded as an opposition organization, was the driving force that stirred up
the Yugoslavian people against President Milošević.
The students of Otpor stirred up a mood against the Yugoslav president, for example by spraying graffiti on half of Belgrade.
Milošević was held responsible for the Balkan wars and the catastrophic economic situation.
The actions of Otpor received a great deal of media attention.
At the instigation of Otpor, almost 100,000 people gathered in Belgrade to protest against the president.
They carried placards en masse with the inscription: He (Milošević) is finished!
Otpor was financed by various NGOs such as the NDI** and the NED.
The NED is primarily funded by the US State Department.
Milošević resigned from office on October 6, 2000.
Aim and result of the war:
As a result of the war, the second largest US military base in Europe - Camp Bondsteel - was established in
Kosovo, with thousands of soldiers on an area of 386 hectares.
By maintaining a military presence in a strategically important region, the USA secured control over potential pipeline
routes for oil and gas from the Middle East and the East, as well as over the commercial exploitation of mineral resources.
British General Michael Jackson - first commander of the NATO-led Kosovo Force KFOR, said: We will certainly be
here for a long time to ensure the security of the energy corridors that run through Macedonia.
At the end of our documentary on the manipulation of the Yugoslavian war, we look at Willy Wimmer's answer to the
question of what we can do about the omnipresent war lies:
What remains for us is the word.
Just as words can trigger wars and destruction, they can also be prevented by words.
Everything that incites people against each other ultimately serves the warmongering powers, which know how to use
weak points very specifically for their global chess moves.
Your words and the distribution of this program can make people aware of such connections and ultimately prevent wars. Help us!